The local authorityCouncil · district · England · 1 of 164 councils (district)

Cotswold.

Liberal Democrats-controlled district. £13m net revenue. 32 wards across 2 parliamentary constituencies.

Typedistrict
Seats35 councillors · 32 wards
Last election4 May 2023
Net revenue · 2025-26
£13m
Core spending power (MHCLG)
Band-D bill
£2,277
For the council slice (incl. precepts)
Composition
22/35
Liberal Democrats 63%
Westminster
2
constituencies overlap · 2 MP parties
Dispatch
31 May 2026

Liberal Democrats chamber, 2-party MP geography.

Cotswold is a district controlled by Liberal Democrats (22 of 35 seats). Net revenue is £13m for 2025-26. It covers 32 wards spanning 2 parliamentary constituencies. The MP geography crosses 2 parties — a heterogeneous setup.

§ 01Composition.35 seats · last contested 4 May 2023

Who sits in the chamber.

LD 22Con 10Green 2Independent Berwick Hills Resident 1

Liberal Democrats 63% · last contested 4 May 2023

Councillors — the people.

CouncillorWardElected
Mark HarrisLDAbbey2023
Clare Victoria TurnerGrnBlockley2023
Len WilkinsConBourton Vale2023
Jon Brian WareingLDBourton Village2023
Gina BlomefieldConCampden Vale2023
Tom StoweConCampden Vale2023
Gina BlomefieldConCampden Vale2019
Paul Richard HodgkinsonLDChedworth Churn Valley2023
Roly HughesLDChesterton2023
John Anthony David FowlesConColn Valley2023
Julia JuddConErmin2023
Michael Jeremy Bernard VannLDFairford North2023
Showing 12 of 35·All 35 councillors
§ 02Revenue mix & Band-D bill.MHCLG — Final LGFS 2025-26 Core Spending Power table

Where revenue comes from.

54%
Council tax
£6.9m · median 61%
37%
Central grants
£4.8m · median 26%
9%
Business rates
£1.1m · median 11%

This is a grant-heavy councils (district): 54% from council tax vs the cohort median of 61%.

Source · MHCLG — Final LGFS 2025-26 Core Spending Power table · derived (CT exact; grants/rates split from SFA baseline)

Band-D bill.

Council slice£159
County / upper-tier£1,680
Police£322
Fire & rescue£0
GLA precept£0
Parish average£116
Total Band-D£2,277

Parish precepts apply on top, vary by parish

For household tax breakdown

Use the income slider on My place to see income tax, NI, VAT and council tax against your earnings.

§ 03Service spend, ranked against peers.6 buckets · vs 163 other councils (district)

How does Cotswold split its revenue across services, compared with peer councils (district)-class councils? Each row is one of the ten standard service buckets. The vertical line at the centre is the cohort median share; the coloured square is where this council sits. Squares to the right of centre mean a bigger share of revenue than the median peer; to the left, a smaller share.

Waste & Recycling57.9% of net spend · cohort median 32%
4 of 158+81% vs median
Planning & Economic Development21.3% of net spend · cohort median 14%
26 of 158+48% vs median
Corporate & Central21.1% of net spend · cohort median 27%
112 of 158-21% vs median
Housing & Homelessness9.0% of net spend · cohort median 14%
126 of 158-36% vs median
Culture & Leisure5.3% of net spend · cohort median 13%
133 of 158-60% vs median
Highways & Transport-14.7% of net spend · cohort median -2%
145 of 158
How to read these bars

The subtitle on each row (“X% of net spend”) is what share of this council’s revenue goes to that service. The rank (“15 of 61”) is where this council sits within the cohort, sorted by that share descending. The delta (“+26% vs median”) is a relative reading: the council allocates 26% more of its revenue to that service than the median peer would. A small absolute difference can still be a big relative one.

Higher share doesn’t mean waste — it can reflect demographic need (more older residents), rurality, or a policy choice (e.g. keeping a service in-house). Lower share doesn’t mean efficiency — some councils move costs to fees, ringfenced accounts, or grants. £-per-head would be sharper than share-of-revenue; LAD population is pending ingest. Comparisons are within the same council type only.

§ 04Top suppliers.1,684 payments · £8.1m gross · 8 Dec 202531 Mar 2026

Every invoice over £500, published under the Local Government Transparency Code. Best-effort, not statutory — counts and totals net negatives (refunds/reversals).

Top by total — last 180 days

SupplierPaidSharePmts
UBICO LIMITED£2.26m28.0%38
PUBLICA GROUP (SUPPORT) LIMITED£1.84m22.8%5
GLOUCESTERSHIRE COUNTY COUNCIL£0.57m7.1%12
WEST OXFORDSHIRE DISTRICT COUNCIL£0.37m4.5%13
GLOUCESTERSHIRE LOCAL GOVERNMENT PENSION SCHEME (LGPS ONLY)£0.27m3.4%3
BRYT ENERGY LIMITED£0.12m1.5%210
CITY SCIENCE CORPORATION LIMITED£0.10m1.3%3
GLOUCESTER CITY COUNCIL£0.09m1.1%5
QUALITY BATHROOM LTD£0.09m1.1%6
CHIPPING CAMPDEN SCHOOL£0.09m1.1%2

By service area · top supplier

Service-classified supplier data not yet ingested for this council.

§ 05Westminster constituencies — the overlap.32 wards split across 2 parliamentary seats

Cotswold’s territory crosses 2 Westminster constituencies, with 2 MP parties represented. The middle column shows how much of the council each seat carries.

ConstituencyWards% of councilCurrent MP
South Cotswolds1856% Roz SavageLD
North Cotswolds1444% Geoffrey Clifton-BrownCon
Of note · the mixed-MP geography

This council holds 1 Ind and 1 Ind MPs. That’s an unusually heterogeneous geography for a Liberal Democrats-controlled district — most weeks one MP is asking the council for something and another is praising it.

Sources, methods & last update
Method The dispatch paragraphs are AI-generated from the public sources listed below. Every figure links to its source. If we’re wrong, please tell us — corrections within 48 hours.
CompositionDemocracy Club (live)
DCLEAPIL v1.0 (historic)
Net revenueMHCLG Final LGFS
Core Spending Power table · 2025-26
Service spendDerived from MHCLG CSP shares
vs 163 other councils (district)
Band-DMHCLG CSP · precept schedules
Police, Fire, Parish on top
SuppliersCouncil publication under LGTC
1,684 payments · 8 Dec 202531 Mar 2026
Westminster overlapONS Open Geography Portal
2023 boundaries
PopulationONS mid-year estimates
Pending ingest at LAD level