The local authorityCouncil · district · England · 1 of 164 councils (district)

Blaby.

Conservative and Unionist Party-controlled district. £12m net revenue. 16 wards across 2 parliamentary constituencies.

Typedistrict
Seats34 councillors · 16 wards
Last election4 May 2023
Net revenue · 2025-26
£12m
Core spending power (MHCLG)
Band-D bill
£2,407
For the council slice (incl. precepts)
Composition
19/34
Conservative and Unionist Party 56%
Westminster
2
constituencies overlap · 1 MP party
Dispatch
31 May 2026

Conservative and Unionist Party chamber, Conservative and Unionist Party MPs.

Blaby is a district controlled by Conservative and Unionist Party (19 of 34 seats). Net revenue is £12m for 2025-26. It covers 16 wards spanning 2 parliamentary constituencies.

§ 01Composition.34 seats · last contested 4 May 2023

Who sits in the chamber.

Con 19LD 9Lab 4Green 2

Conservative and Unionist Party 56% · last contested 4 May 2023

Councillors — the people.

CouncillorWardElected
Antony Robert MoseleyLDBlaby2023
Paul HartshornLDBlaby2023
Nick BrownLabBraunstone Millfield2023
Tracey ShepherdLabBraunstone Millfield2023
Jane WolfeConCosby South Whetstone2023
Les PhillimoreConCosby South Whetstone2023
Adrian CliffordConCountesthorpe2023
John Richard HoldridgeLDCountesthorpe2023
Royston Oliver Charles BaylissLDCountesthorpe2023
Cheryl CashmoreConEnderby2023
Hannah Victoria GillLDEnderby2023
Ben TaylorConFosse Highcross2023
Showing 12 of 34·All 34 councillors
§ 02Revenue mix & Band-D bill.MHCLG — Final LGFS 2025-26 Core Spending Power table

Where revenue comes from.

57%
Council tax
£6.8m · median 61%
33%
Central grants
£3.9m · median 26%
11%
Business rates
£1.3m · median 11%

Revenue mix is close to the councils (district) median: 57% council tax, 33% central grants.

Source · MHCLG — Final LGFS 2025-26 Core Spending Power table · derived (CT exact; grants/rates split from SFA baseline)

Band-D bill.

Council slice£195
County / upper-tier£1,682
Police£300
Fire & rescue£87
GLA precept£0
Parish average£144
Total Band-D£2,407

Parish precepts apply on top, vary by parish

For household tax breakdown

Use the income slider on My place to see income tax, NI, VAT and council tax against your earnings.

§ 03Service spend, ranked against peers.9 buckets · vs 163 other councils (district)

How does Blaby split its revenue across services, compared with peer councils (district)-class councils? Each row is one of the ten standard service buckets. The vertical line at the centre is the cohort median share; the coloured square is where this council sits. Squares to the right of centre mean a bigger share of revenue than the median peer; to the left, a smaller share.

Corporate & Central31.3% of net spend · cohort median 27%
51 of 158+17% vs median
Waste & Recycling30.2% of net spend · cohort median 32%
96 of 158-6% vs median
Planning & Economic Development21.1% of net spend · cohort median 14%
30 of 158+46% vs median
Housing & Homelessness14.1% of net spend · cohort median 14%
79 of 1580% vs median
Culture & Leisure2.2% of net spend · cohort median 13%
148 of 158-83% vs median
Children's Services1.4% of net spend · cohort median 1%
4 of 9+11% vs median
Public Health0.8% of net spend · cohort median 0%
8 of 38+84% vs median
Highways & Transport-0.1% of net spend · cohort median -2%
46 of 158
Adult Social Care-1.0% of net spend · cohort median 1%
24 of 24-223% vs median
How to read these bars

The subtitle on each row (“X% of net spend”) is what share of this council’s revenue goes to that service. The rank (“15 of 61”) is where this council sits within the cohort, sorted by that share descending. The delta (“+26% vs median”) is a relative reading: the council allocates 26% more of its revenue to that service than the median peer would. A small absolute difference can still be a big relative one.

Higher share doesn’t mean waste — it can reflect demographic need (more older residents), rurality, or a policy choice (e.g. keeping a service in-house). Lower share doesn’t mean efficiency — some councils move costs to fees, ringfenced accounts, or grants. £-per-head would be sharper than share-of-revenue; LAD population is pending ingest. Comparisons are within the same council type only.

§ 04Top suppliers.331 payments · £1.6m gross · 5 Jan 20264 Feb 2026

Every invoice over £500, published under the Local Government Transparency Code. Best-effort, not statutory — counts and totals net negatives (refunds/reversals).

Top by total — last 180 days

SupplierPaidSharePmts
LEICESTERSHIRE COUNTY COUNCIL£0.40m24.2%11
IPL PLASTICS (UK) LIMITED£0.14m8.8%5
RENT CONNECT£0.09m5.2%1
NHS LEICESTER, LEICESTERSHIRE & RUTLAND ICB£0.06m3.4%2
PHOENIX SOFTWARE LTD£0.05m3.4%4
ONEADVANCED LTD£0.05m3.0%1
CROWN OIL LIMITED£0.04m2.7%1
STANNAH LIFT SERVICES LIMITED£0.04m2.7%8
JEAKINS WEIR LIMITED£0.04m2.5%1
AZETS AUDIT SERVICES LIMITED£0.04m2.4%1

By service area · top supplier

Service-classified supplier data not yet ingested for this council.

§ 05Westminster constituencies — the overlap.16 wards split across 2 parliamentary seats
ConstituencyWards% of councilCurrent MP
South Leicestershire1169% Alberto CostaCon
Mid Leicestershire638% Peter BedfordCon
Sources, methods & last update
Method The dispatch paragraphs are AI-generated from the public sources listed below. Every figure links to its source. If we’re wrong, please tell us — corrections within 48 hours.
CompositionDemocracy Club (live)
DCLEAPIL v1.0 (historic)
Net revenueMHCLG Final LGFS
Core Spending Power table · 2025-26
Service spendDerived from MHCLG CSP shares
vs 163 other councils (district)
Band-DMHCLG CSP · precept schedules
Police, Fire, Parish on top
SuppliersCouncil publication under LGTC
331 payments · 5 Jan 20264 Feb 2026
Westminster overlapONS Open Geography Portal
2023 boundaries
PopulationONS mid-year estimates
Pending ingest at LAD level