The Westminster lensArchive · §02 Speeches · 904 contributions

Speeches by Yang.

Every Hansard contribution by Yuan Yang this parliament, most recent first. Back to the MP page for the headline figures and analysed positions.

Showing 721740 of 904 contributions · most-recent first

← PreviousPage 37 of 46Next →
DateDebate & contributionWords
12 Feb 2025Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 687)

Ms Russell, you mentioned earlier that the Treasury is also conducting its own zero-based review of its own costs. Do you consider the Treasury indemnity to the Bank of England’s asset purchase facility as one of those costs? I note the publication from the Bank yesterday that estimates around £30 billion a year is bei

68
12 Feb 2025Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 687)

Bringing in Ms Russell and Ms Beckett, if appropriate, could you give a kind of concrete, worked-through example of how the Treasury would negotiate this zero-based review? Let’s say one Department is spending money on youth clubs and another is spending money on filling in potholes; would you be asking for the same se

74
12 Feb 2025Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 687)

In that process, would the Treasury then be speaking to each Department about specifically, “How many youth clubs are you procuring? How many potholes are you filling?” Would it be that detailed, or would it be more a sense of making sure that their processes are correct? What level of detail would you get?

54
12 Feb 2025Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 687)

Are there any examples—this is perhaps for Mr Smewing—of the green flags that you would want back from certain Departments to make sure that their youth clubs programme, let’s say, was value for money, or some red flags that would show you that it wasn’t? What kinds of examples would you want?

52
12 Feb 2025Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 687)

In terms of social value, or in terms of taxpayer money? What kind of evaluation would that be?

18
12 Feb 2025Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 687)

So it would be social value defined in terms of the impact on the taxpayers of funding over all public services provision in the longer run—if that data is possible; that is the ideal.

34
11 Feb 2025Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 685)

Are those specialists who you have in-house trained to deal with economic abuse in domestic abuse cases as well?

19
11 Feb 2025Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 685)

Do you have your own in-house team dealing with this kind of abuse?

13
11 Feb 2025Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 685)

On the point about training, I wanted to ask about economic abuse, and particularly domestic and financial abuse. The FCA, for example, recommends that financial firms have specialist teams dealing with this kind of abuse. I was wondering whether the FOS also has its own in-house specialist teams.

48
11 Feb 2025Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 685)

That is great to hear. When will that start happening, and will you publish this for all to see as well?

21
11 Feb 2025Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 685)

Could you say a bit more about what will change going forward and what has led to that change?

19
11 Feb 2025Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 685)

In terms of the data that you collect on debt collection as well as APP fraud and various other scams that you deal with, do you collect data on the protected characteristics of complainants, and other demographic data, to help to understand which groups are more at systemic risk from this kind of abuse?

54
11 Feb 2025Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 685)

In terms of the tactics for debt collectors and bailiffs, for example, do those kinds of complaints come to you, and is there any trend that you are seeing pre-pandemic to now?

32
11 Feb 2025Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 685)

I have some questions around debt collection and how FOS deals with vulnerable customers. First, on debt collection, I note that before the pandemic your organisation warned about aggressive customer service tactics in debt collection, and sometimes breaches of confidentiality from debt collectors. Given that the pande

65
4 Feb 2025Backbench Business Committee — Oral Evidence (2025-02-04)

I very much take your point, particularly about the impact on women’s football. Unfortunately, that part of Reading football club was one of the first to suffer from the current ownership problem. The reason why it is so important, as Lee says, is that ambassadors from these clubs promote youth football and women’s foo

57
4 Feb 2025Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 682)

Sir Ian, you mentioned that, during the pandemic, you found high levels of flat refusal.

15
4 Feb 2025Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 682)

I was wondering if you could talk a bit more about what two times the level of effort means in terms of the ONS’s resource. Might this be a steady state, or is it changing?

35
4 Feb 2025Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 682)

What is the incentive?

4
4 Feb 2025Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 682)

Do you have any theories about the reason behind this increase in effort? Will it be the steady state level of effort or will people change?

26
4 Feb 2025Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 682)

I have some questions about the future of data-gathering. Sir Ian, you mentioned the increased cost of getting people to respond on the doorstep. Is the current balance between administrative and survey data the right one for the long run, or will there be a tendency towards more use of administrative data?

52
← PreviousPage 37 of 46 · click a debate to open the transcript with this MP’s speeches highlightedNext →
Sources
SourceHansard · official report
MethodEach row is one contribution (intervention or speech). Word count from the official text.