The Westminster lensArchive · Written questions · 68 tabled · 61 answered

Written questions by Foxcroft.

Every parliamentary written question tabled by Vicky Foxcroft this session, with the full answer and department. Back to the MP page.

Department:All (68)Department for Education (14)Department for Work and Pensions (12)Home Office (11)Department for Energy Security and Net Zero (10)Department of Health and Social Care (7)Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (6)Department for Business and Trade (5)Treasury (3)

Showing 15 of 5 · Department for Business and Trade

29 May 2026·Department for Business and Trade·Pending
Asked

Whether an assessment was made of the potential merits of including second‑hand furniture in the scope of the 2026 Office for Product Safety and Standards consultation on furniture fire safety regulations.

Reply

Awaiting answer.

29 May 2026·Department for Business and Trade·Pending
Asked

For what reasons her Department is proposing a sector‑specific UK testing framework for furniture fire safety rather than adopting a general product safety approach.

Reply

Awaiting answer.

29 May 2026·Department for Business and Trade·Pending
Asked

What is the timeline in which his Department plans to introduce the revised testing framework for furniture fire safety proposed in the Office for Product Safety and Standards’ forthcoming consultation.

Reply

Awaiting answer.

19 Mar 2026·Department for Business and Trade·Answered
Asked

What assessment he has made of the implications for his policies of the recommendation from the Environmental Audit Committee's Toxic Chemicals in Everyday Life report of 2019 to end the use of the ‘match and fillings’ tests; and whether he plans to prioritise the removal of chemical contaminants at source alongside existing cleaning protocols.

Reply

Whilst the government is not aware of any evidence that directly links elevated cancer rates to the Furniture and Furnishings (Fire) (Safety) Regulations 1988 (the FFRs), we recognise that there is an increasing body of evidence to support action to reduce the volume of chemical flame retardants (CFRs) which are used to ensure that upholstered furniture passes flammability tests.The policy paper 'The fire safety of domestic upholstered furniture', published on 22 January 2025, set out the Government’s commitment to delivering reforms to the FFRs that maintain a high level of fire safety while also facilitating a reduction in the use of CFRs.Since publication, the Department for Business and Trade has undertaken targeted engagement to inform next steps, including a roundtable in July 2025 that considered the issue of open-flame testing. The Government will provide an update on this in due course.

19 Mar 2026·Department for Business and Trade·Answered
Asked

Whether the Department has made any assessment of the link between the 1988 Furniture Regulations and the 323% elevated cancer rates among young firefighters cited in London Assembly's Exposure to fire contaminants in London: A hidden, growing risk? - Fire Committee report (February 2026).

Reply

Whilst the government is not aware of any evidence that directly links elevated cancer rates to the Furniture and Furnishings (Fire) (Safety) Regulations 1988 (the FFRs), we recognise that there is an increasing body of evidence to support action to reduce the volume of chemical flame retardants (CFRs) which are used to ensure that upholstered furniture passes flammability tests.The policy paper 'The fire safety of domestic upholstered furniture', published on 22 January 2025, set out the Government’s commitment to delivering reforms to the FFRs that maintain a high level of fire safety while also facilitating a reduction in the use of CFRs.Since publication, the Department for Business and Trade has undertaken targeted engagement to inform next steps, including a roundtable in July 2025 that considered the issue of open-flame testing. The Government will provide an update on this in due course.

Sources
SourceUK Parliament Members API
MethodQuestion and answer text as published. Question preamble (“To ask the…”) trimmed for readability; answers shown in full.