Speeches by Roca.
Every Hansard contribution by Tim Roca this parliament, most recent first. Back to the MP page for the headline figures and analysed positions.
Showing 241–260 of 424 contributions · most-recent first
| Date | Debate & contribution | Words |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Mar 2025 | Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 588) “The intention is to increase the dividend payments with inflation by CPIH?” | 12 |
| 25 Mar 2025 | Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 588) “We touched on pay earlier, so I understand your overall package was £860,000 in ’22-’23. Is that right?” | 18 |
| 25 Mar 2025 | Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 588) “And what is it this year?” | 6 |
| 25 Mar 2025 | Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 588) “Again, that is quite a large sum of money. Do you think that is fair remuneration for the work that you do?” | 22 |
| 25 Mar 2025 | Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 588) “Of the measures the committee uses to set your pay, there are over 40 from what I could see but affordability to the customer of their bills was not one of them. Did that seem fair to you?” | 38 |
| 25 Mar 2025 | Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 588) “Do you think, then, affordability for customers of their bills should be one of the measures you are measured against when your pay is being set?” | 26 |
| 25 Mar 2025 | Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 588) “It is not explicitly in the criteria, is it?” | 9 |
| 25 Mar 2025 | Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 588) “There is financial efficiency of the company, of course—” | 9 |
| 25 Mar 2025 | Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 588) “But there is no explicit measure for you to keep people’s bills down in the way that your pay is set. Because if the company is incredibly efficient it might just return more money to its shareholders, might it not, rather than reduce cost?” | 44 |
| 25 Mar 2025 | Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 588) “These are large sums of money in terms of remuneration, which the public will obviously be concerned about. Ofwat criticised your policies for the performance-related pay and suggested they do not match expected company performance. Do you share that assessment?” | 40 |
| 25 Mar 2025 | Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 588) “Absolutely, because this is about rebuilding confidence.” | 7 |
| 25 Mar 2025 | Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 588) “I will address it to you, Paul, in the first instance. Yorkshire Water’s return on equity has been 6.2%, significantly above Ofwat’s recommended 4% level. The shareholder return has been about 10% on average, despite the penalties and fines for the underperformance that we have certainly heard of today. Why do you main…” | 60 |
| 25 Mar 2025 | Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 588) “Talking about bill payers, the University of Greenwich suggests that a third of the average bill for a customer—about £442—is going away from frontline services and into debt or dividend payments. Do you recognise that figure?” | 36 |
| 25 Mar 2025 | Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 588) “Linking to borrowing, obviously we have talked about gearing before. BBC analysis suggests that you have paid £2 billion in interest on debt and loans over the last seven years and that the total debt pile has increased from £4.8 billion to £6.2 billion, while only £1.2 billion has been spent on enhancement capital exp…” | 66 |
| 25 Mar 2025 | Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 588) “The level of debt within the sector overall is quite a sensitive issue to the public. I do not know if you have a comment on it because, overall since privatisation, something like £70 billion has been taken out in dividends but £60 billion of debt has been created as well.” | 51 |
| 25 Mar 2025 | Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 588) “Nicola, can I turn to you to talk about executive pay, which is obviously very much in the media? It is a monopoly business; you have captive customers, so it is controversial. Last year, your base salary was £585,000. Is that right?” | 42 |
| 25 Mar 2025 | Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 588) “There were taxable benefits of £13,000 and retirement benefits of £59,000, which you took in cash?” | 16 |
| 25 Mar 2025 | Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 588) “Then on top—which is the controversial element, I suppose, although that is already a great deal of money—there is the EIP short-term element, which I guess is what people would consider a bonus of £371,000. Do you feel that is a fair approach to remuneration?” | 45 |
| 25 Mar 2025 | Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 588) “It is a very large number and customers will be considering value for money. I do not want to misquote you, but after receiving the bonus, you defended the plan to increase bills by 41% by saying that shareholders wanted to make sure you were kept incentivised. Were you not incentivised by the £657,000?” | 54 |
| 25 Mar 2025 | Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 588) “I feel like Abraham Maslow is probably turning in his grave that you would not be incentivised with that base salary. In the basket of measures the remuneration committee uses to look at whether you should receive the EIP, affordability for the customer of their bills is not part of that basket of measures, is it?” | 56 |