The Westminster lensArchive · §02 Speeches · 439 contributions

Speeches by Roca.

Every Hansard contribution by Tim Roca this parliament, most recent first. Back to the MP page for the headline figures and analysed positions.

Showing 201220 of 439 contributions · most-recent first

← PreviousPage 11 of 22Next →
DateDebate & contributionWords
13 May 2025Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 588)

Can I ask about the £3 billion loan from your Class A bondholders including Elliott Management and Silver Point? We have had a note from your Class B creditors—you will not be surprised to hear—who described it as a payday loan style arrangement. Can I ask Chris perhaps for your assessment of the loan and its potential

64
13 May 2025Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 588)

Can we talk a bit about the time pressure? We have just talked about the five weeks’ liquidity. The Class B group said that the loan took advantage of the time pressure Thames is under. So was the urgency that drove the deal solely about liquidity?

46
13 May 2025Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 588)

Customers will find that extraordinary in view of that earlier amount.

11
13 May 2025Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 588)

But it would be up to £1 million for some executives, would it not?

14
13 May 2025Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 588)

So the reason you went with the A proposition is because you could not see an agreement. The difference between the two offers was quite substantial, was it not? The As offered an interest rate of 9.75% and the Bs offered an alternative at 8%, which would have potentially saved £375 million.

52
13 May 2025Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 588)

But that was not the assessment of everybody at Thames, was it? Because actually there were members of the board who thought the Bs’ offer was better. That was reported in the Financial Times.

34
13 May 2025Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 588)

And that was on the principle that that was a solid offer that you needed immediately, whereas the other offer—which was a lower interest rate—there was no certainty of it being accepted.

32
13 May 2025Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 588)

We are talking about alternatives. The High Court suggested you might have found better terms in the market from new funders. What is your assessment of that?

27
13 May 2025Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 588)

Again, the Class B creditors have suggested there are hidden terms and conditions in the terms that you agreed to in the end. Can you talk a little about what they might be referring to?

35
13 May 2025Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 588)

Was this at the point where you had five weeks left of liquidity that you were talking about earlier?

19
13 May 2025Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 588)

Does the deal include any financial retention incentives for executives at Thames?

12
13 May 2025Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 588)

Can you give us an idea of what those incentives might be?

12
13 May 2025Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 588)

What sort of size are these bonuses?

7
13 May 2025Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 588)

So very substantial bonuses.

4
13 May 2025Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 588)

A layperson looking at this would see that there was an offer from the A’s at 9.75% that came with financial incentives to retain people, and there was an offer from the B’s at a lower interest rate, and there might be some scepticism or a suggestion that one offer was gone with for other reasons. What would you say to

62
13 May 2025Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 588)

The Class A offer involves an incentive scheme for executives that could be worth up to £1 million for yourself, I suggest, Chris. Is that correct?

26
13 May 2025Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 588)

But urgency will have worsened the conditions that you will have got from lenders, will it not?

17
6 May 2025Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 611)

The NFU made the point before Christmas that the publication of data is really important in this space to build confidence and understanding of what is being seized, where and in what numbers, so that people can build a picture.

40
6 May 2025Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 611)

Is your view that business and trade is ready for the implementation of these checks?

15
6 May 2025Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 611)

There has obviously been a lot of talk of a self‑regulation model in this area as well. Is this something that potentially the Department might consider, so an alternative approach for fresh produce, such as an authorised operator status and the use of control points?

45
← PreviousPage 11 of 22 · click a debate to open the transcript with this MP’s speeches highlightedNext →
Sources
SourceHansard · official report
MethodEach row is one contribution (intervention or speech). Word count from the official text.