The Westminster lensArchive · §02 Speeches · 184 contributions

Speeches by Flynn.

Every Hansard contribution by Stephen Flynn this parliament, most recent first. Back to the MP page for the headline figures and analysed positions.

Showing 120 of 184 contributions · most-recent first

Page 1 of 10Next →
DateDebate & contributionWords
29 Apr 2026Engagements

Depending upon the results in the elections next week, this may well be my final PMQs. I suppose that the same is perhaps true for the Prime Minister as well. But before then, does he understand that, yes, it is because of inaction on the cost of living crisis; yes, it is because of the debacle of the winter fuel payme

economy-jobsfiscal-policydefence
123
28 Apr 2026Referral of Prime Minister to Committee of Privileges

It is hard at this stage to come to any other conclusion. If Labour Members had confidence in their Prime Minister, they would already be going to the Privileges Committee, irrespective of the views of any of us in this here House. Notwithstanding the arguments that have been made regarding Olly Robbins, Simon Case and

mp-performance
304
28 Apr 2026Referral of Prime Minister to Committee of Privileges

It is a pleasure to follow the hon. Member for Macclesfield (Tim Roca), who has done no harm whatsoever to his case to soon become a junior Whip in the Government—[Interruption.] Or a trade envoy, of course. [Hon. Members: “An ambassador!”] I will let hon. Members have their fun soon. I wish to start on a much more imp

mp-performance
639
27 Apr 2026Lord Mandelson Humble Address: Government Response Update

In respect of the Humble Address, perhaps contrary to what was suggested earlier, the House agreed to it only on the basis that Labour MPs were about to rebel against the position that the Government had adopted. Tomorrow, something similar may arise in respect of a potential referral of the Prime Minister to the Privi

mp-performancefiscal-policyother
88
27 Apr 2026 Points of Order

On a point of order, Madam Deputy Speaker. When I asked how the Government intend to vote tomorrow, the Chief Secretary to the Prime Minister said that he would not answer, because the question did not pertain to the motion before us. He then used that as a justification for not answering the questions of numerous Oppo

mp-performanceother
95
21 Apr 2026Peter Mandelson: Government Appointment

I congratulate the right hon. Lady on securing this debate, and indeed on eviscerating the Prime Minister in her speech. Does she not believe that the sorry souls on the Government Benches should have to put their money with their mouth is, and that there should be a vote of no confidence in this Prime Minister in due

mp-performancedefenceeconomy-jobs
59
21 Apr 2026Middle East: Economic Update

We are very fortunate in Scotland to already produce more renewable electricity than we consume, and of course we produce more oil and gas than we consume as well. Unfortunately, we do not experience any benefit in our bills. The Chancellor had the cheek to say that she regards the oil and gas workforce as a vital asse

energyeconomy-jobscost-of-living
133
20 Apr 2026Security Vetting

The harshest and most important truth in this entire process is that the Prime Minister of the United Kingdom chose to proactively ignore the victims of Jeffrey Epstein when he made the political choice to put Peter Mandelson in as the UK’s most senior diplomat in the United States of America, despite knowing that he h

mp-performancedefence
122
13 Apr 2026Middle East

The Prime Minister is absolutely right to condemn the abhorrent response of the terrorists in the IRGC, but I notice in his statement that there was no explicit condemnation of the illegality of Donald Trump’s actions, there was no explicit condemnation of the illegality of Netanyahu’s action, and—despite having the en

defenceenergycost-of-living
126
24 Mar 2026Oil and Gas

One reason that Norway is so successful is the certainty that is applied to its tax regime in respect of oil and gas drilling. The Conservatives’ motion, as I read it, seeks to remove the energy profits levy. As a point of clarity, can the right hon. Lady be clear with the House as to whether she would want that to be

energyeconomy-jobsenvironment
80
24 Mar 2026Oil and Gas

The workers who the Minister is referring to have a very different take from his own on his Government’s approach to the North sea. Indeed, I think they would be incredulous at the arguments he is making today and that his Government have made over many months, because it is costing them their jobs. He knows that movin

energyeconomy-jobsenvironment
102
11 Mar 2026Lord Mandelson: Response to Humble Address Motion

Right honourable.

mp-performancefiscal-policyother
2
11 Mar 2026Lord Mandelson: Response to Humble Address Motion

If I listened to the Chief Secretary correctly, which I think I did, he said, “His victims must be our first priority.” Let us be clear: for the Prime Minister, they were not. On 11 December 2024, he received advice that says, “Epstein was first convicted of procuring an underage girl in 2008”. The following sentence s

mp-performancefiscal-policyother
132
11 Mar 2026Engagements

Let us be clear on this. Donald Trump’s war in Iran is illegal and the situation that has unfolded since is verging on insane: oil is falling from the skies; sewers are exploding; and the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps is indiscriminately attacking both civilians across the region and cargo ships, as well as potenti

defencecost-of-livingenergy
149
11 Feb 2026Engagements

If I have just heard the Prime Minister correctly, he has essentially rolled the same pitch in relation to Matthew Doyle as he did with Peter Mandelson, in saying that they were not clear with him. He appears to be the most gullible former Director of Public Prosecutions in history. But he has a slight problem, because

mp-performancecrimehousing
120
4 Feb 2026Lord Mandelson

Will the right hon. Member give way?

mp-performancedefenceother
7
4 Feb 2026Lord Mandelson

I will not, I am afraid. The Prime Minister knew that the two had a relationship, yet he ignored it. He ignored each and every victim of Jeffrey Epstein when he chose to appoint Mandelson as the ambassador to the United States of America.

mp-performancedefenceother
44
4 Feb 2026Lord Mandelson

In this Chamber, just under three hours ago, the Prime Minister of the United Kingdom made a long overdue and welcome admission. For months, he, various Labour Members, Ministers and members of the Cabinet have told us all to ignore our eyes and our ears. The Prime Minister has said that he was not aware of the relatio

mp-performancedefenceother
75
4 Feb 2026Lord Mandelson

No, I will not. Today’s debate is important because we will get to the bottom of what Peter Mandelson did—I will come to that—but also because we in this Chamber cannot forgive or forget the judgment of the Prime Minister when he chose to make that political choice. It was a choice that Labour Members have told us repe

mp-performancedefenceother
96
4 Feb 2026Lord Mandelson

Four hours is plenty for me, Mr Speaker. This is a dark and disgusting day for this Chamber and for each and every person living on these isles, because their Prime Minister admitted that he knew about the relationship. Of course he knew; in The Guardian in 2023, Rowena Mason wrote about the court documents that had be

mp-performancedefenceother
144
Page 1 of 10 · click a debate to open the transcript with this MP’s speeches highlightedNext →
Sources
SourceHansard · official report
MethodEach row is one contribution (intervention or speech). Word count from the official text.