The Westminster lensArchive · §02 Speeches · 1,066 contributions

Speeches by Mahmood.

Every Hansard contribution by Shabana Mahmood this parliament, most recent first. Back to the MP page for the headline figures and analysed positions.

Showing 101120 of 1,066 contributions · most-recent first

← PreviousPage 6 of 54Next →
DateDebate & contributionWords
4 Feb 2026Home Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 505)

We are consulting on the precise nature of whether to look at changing the rules on settlement and recourse to public funds, which would of course require primary legislation, or whether to simply extend the qualifying period to beyond 10 years for particular cohorts of lower-skilled workers. That is an open question,

263
4 Feb 2026Home Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 505)

It is my understanding that even on 15 October, in an email exchange, it was still believed that all options were on the table. I think my officials were trying to get information all the way through about what was going on. The possibility was raised on 8 October, and there is the email exchange about all options—

58
4 Feb 2026Home Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 505)

Yes, and I understand that, but I repeat that under the previous Government there was an expected market shortage for social care workers of between 6,000 and 40,000. That is quite a big range, which tells you that there is unreliability in the understanding of exactly what the needs of that part of the workforce are.

117
4 Feb 2026Home Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 505)

The consultation asks a very open question about whether the way to manage this part of the problem is to change what is available to you once you get settled status, versus just extending the qualifying period. There are pros and cons to both. On that particular question, the consultation is, and I am personally, very

190
4 Feb 2026Home Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 505)

Again, we have published the consultation. There has been some helpful discussion around whether you look purely at individuals’ earnings or at household income potentially. It is not unusual, in our arrangements, to consider the income of a whole household as opposed to just one or two individuals within it. Again, th

136
4 Feb 2026Home Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 505)

Again, what I would gently point out is that these are children who have been brought in by their own parents. In a system of economic migration, people are coming to the country to work. It is fair for us to expect that people coming into the country to work are able to support themselves and their families. That is d

201
4 Feb 2026Home Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 505)

We have already announced that we want to go from a baseline five-year qualifying period to 10 years, which we are not consulting on. We have a relatively generous welfare state. Five years is actually quite a short period before people can be permanently settled in the country, with all the benefits that brings. It is

279
4 Feb 2026Home Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 505)

We obviously want to be able to ultimately break this business model. We are interested in all and any mechanisms that we have at our disposal to do that. It requires co-operation with international partners. We are in the middle of a negotiation at the moment, and I will not—

50
4 Feb 2026Home Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 505)

You are only bringing in workers to benefit your economy, right? Of course you would want to look at earnings in that context; I do not think there is anything wrong with that. Successive Governments have made the argument for wanting this country to be able to attract the brightest and the best. It would be odd if we

130
4 Feb 2026Home Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 505)

No, I disagree. If you look at our paper on the new proposals for settlement, the intention is to restore the element of contribution at the heart of the system. I think that our country is full of very tolerant and generous people—we are very open—but I think there is a condition to that, which is about contribution.

337
4 Feb 2026Home Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 505)

I would not say it is deterrence. There is a particular issue where we have seen migration into the country on a very large scale—much more than was expected—and of a very different nature to what we have had before, both in terms of the skills range and the number of dependants. Something like 50% of the care work num

203
4 Feb 2026Home Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 505)

I would dispute that net migration is at very low levels. It is still really quite high. It has had a big drop from the very large increases that you saw under the previous Administration, but it is still comfortably over 200,000, which is still quite high on any measure. When I first came into Parliament, back in the

150
4 Feb 2026Home Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 505)

I am not, as you will know, able to see the papers of the previous Government, so, being in the building now, it is difficult for me to see exactly what was happening under the previous Administration. I would say that the publicly available numbers showed a big increase. As a constituency Member of Parliament, I was s

116
4 Feb 2026Home Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 505)

Evidence has already been given to the Committee about what was said in front of me on 8 October—

19
4 Feb 2026Home Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 505)

The reforms for settlement are precipitated by the issues in relation to the scale and pace of recent migration into the country. Between 2021 and 2024, net migration stood at 2.6 million people, which means that around one in every 30 people in this country today arrived in those four years. We have seen particular is

353
4 Feb 2026Home Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 505)

It is inconceivable that they wouldn’t have been aware at all. Obviously, it would be for them to explain what exactly they knew and when, but even if you just go by the information that was publicly available, in which you could see the big growths in net migration, I think it became very clear very quickly that there

73
4 Feb 2026Home Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 505)

Well, we are talking about a system of economic migration, so I think it would be odd to say that we are not looking at earnings. You are looking for people to come and work, and the intention is that they can support themselves. You are not looking to bring in people who will ultimately require assistance from the wel

165
4 Feb 2026Home Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 505)

I think we’ve had a lot of dodgy providers in this area. That is why we have closed the route and revoked so many sponsor licences. As the rules were changed and we started to look at medium and lower-skilled migrants, it was obvious that those new routes were open to abuse. It is one of the reasons why, going back to

231
4 Feb 2026Home Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 505)

Again, we have to set fees at a level that is appropriate. It is a privilege, not a right. It would be odd if we had a system of no fees for some people because we have to manage the system properly. There are costs attached to processing these applications. Again, people make choices themselves to come to another coun

87
4 Feb 2026Home Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 505)

I think it is right that we move to a system where refugee status is temporary, rather than permanent. At the moment, once you are deemed to be a refugee and you succeed in your claim, as you say—that’s it. At that point, you have full status here. In fact, until we changed the rules on family reunification, you were a

229
← PreviousPage 6 of 54 · click a debate to open the transcript with this MP’s speeches highlightedNext →
Sources
SourceHansard · official report
MethodEach row is one contribution (intervention or speech). Word count from the official text.