The Westminster lensArchive · §02 Speeches · 347 contributions

Speeches by Russell.

Every Hansard contribution by Sarah Russell this parliament, most recent first. Back to the MP page for the headline figures and analysed positions.

Showing 6180 of 347 contributions · most-recent first

← PreviousPage 4 of 18Next →
DateDebate & contributionWords
14 Apr 2026Justice Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1247)

The reality is that if you have an ongoing legal matter and you need ongoing support, you do not want to upset your lawyer by putting in a formal complaint about them, let alone complain to the SRA in any way, shape or form. My gut feeling is that if you did some survey work of the type that you have described of peopl

72
14 Apr 2026Justice Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1247)

I would not disagree that it has potential.

8
14 Apr 2026Justice Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1247)

The report was issued in September last year. What concrete steps have you taken in your organisation to change it to reflect the report?

24
14 Apr 2026Justice Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1247)

It might be. It depends if the AI is hallucinating. It depends if the AI is trustworthy.

17
14 Apr 2026Justice Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1247)

The Bar Standards Board made decisions, such as those listed in the report, around male barristers who inappropriately touched and consistently harassed very junior female barristers—sometimes pupils—in ways that constituted public sexual assault. Those men were suspended for three months—the examples are all in the re

64
14 Apr 2026Justice Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1247)

Do you think that that discloses any areas in which you should function differently?

14
14 Apr 2026Justice Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1247)

One of the elements of the report refers to the fact that judicial appointments were not apparently liaising in any way with the Bar Standards Board. Do you feel that indicates a failure on your part?

36
14 Apr 2026Justice Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1247)

In theory, that all sounds fantastic. There are obviously significant problems with AI models hallucinating. There are significant problems with AI models having inbuilt biases, in respect of both race and sex. How does your current regulatory strategy look at that?

41
14 Apr 2026Justice Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1247)

You just talked about Garfield AI, and that is an extremely interesting model. Do you feel that your regulatory framework works?

21
14 Apr 2026Justice Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1247)

On that topic, I am a solicitor—I practised for nearly 14 years—and I have never heard of this website. I spent a year supervising in a law centre, and I am not aware of you having any contact with our law centre about this in that time. You say that you do a lot of promotional activity, but I was a local councillor fo

107
14 Apr 2026Justice Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1247)

What extent of protection do you think the public need from AI?

12
14 Apr 2026Justice Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1247)

You commented that the case for a review of the reserved legal activities is growing. Which reserved legal activities do you think need to change?

25
14 Apr 2026Justice Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1247)

What work, if any, are you doing on AI bias? How that will be managed within the sector?

18
14 Apr 2026Justice Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1247)

You were established in 2007, so the SRA is a relatively recent organisation, but not that new. I got the impression from what you just said that it was probably quite innovative work for you to speak to people who had experience of using legal services. Is that a fair characterisation?

51
14 Apr 2026Justice Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1247)

You were established in 2007, so the SRA is a relatively recent organisation, but not that new. I got the impression from what you just said that it was probably quite innovative work for you to speak to people who had experience of using legal services. Is that a fair characterisation?

51
14 Apr 2026Justice Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1247)

What are you doing about costs? To put that comment into some context, I am a solicitor, but my experience of friends and family using law firms is that they have not received transparent information up front about costs and that they have been consistently surprised by the bills that they received. As a solicitor, I f

115
14 Apr 2026Justice Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1247)

That is great, but fundamentally my question is about when someone instructs a solicitor, and they think it is going to cost £1,000 but then it actually costs £5,000 and that expectation has not been managed from start to finish in the transaction. They may get a retrospective explanation for why that cost escalated, b

85
14 Apr 2026Justice Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1247)

The reality is that if you have an ongoing legal matter and you need ongoing support, you do not want to upset your lawyer by putting in a formal complaint about them, let alone complain to the SRA in any way, shape or form. My gut feeling is that if you did some survey work of the type that you have described of peopl

72
14 Apr 2026Justice Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1247)

That is super. I have one last, very short point that I want to make. In my constituency, there is an ongoing problem with leaseholders whose estates have subsequently not been adopted, who do not understand the service charges they are going to be subject to on an ongoing basis and who have not understood the risks as

144
14 Apr 2026Justice Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1247)

Perhaps, but as a regulator, that is quite a big assumption.

11
← PreviousPage 4 of 18 · click a debate to open the transcript with this MP’s speeches highlightedNext →
Sources
SourceHansard · official report
MethodEach row is one contribution (intervention or speech). Word count from the official text.