The Westminster lensArchive · §02 Speeches · 825 contributions

Speeches by Smith.

Every Hansard contribution by Rebecca Smith this parliament, most recent first. Back to the MP page for the headline figures and analysed positions.

Showing 521540 of 825 contributions · most-recent first

← PreviousPage 27 of 42Next →
DateDebate & contributionWords
19 May 2025 Adoption and Kinship Placements

I agree with the hon. Member that there is definitely a concern around that issue. I will touch on it more later, but it has already been brought up this afternoon. I turn to what some of my constituents are saying. My constituent CA said: “These children are slipping through the net and it is the parents who are deali

social-careeducationlocal-government
994
19 May 2025 Adoption and Kinship Placements

I beg to move, That this House has considered Government support for children in adoptive and kinship placements. It is a pleasure to serve under your chairmanship today, Mrs Harris, and I thank so many hon. Members for being present in the Chamber. I will keep my speech as short as possible so that they can all get in

social-careeducationlocal-government
320
19 May 2025 Adoption and Kinship Placements

Absolutely: the goalposts have completely shifted. As we saw with farming, it happened overnight, so there was no warning for families and no ability for them to come up with other ideas.

social-careeducationlocal-government
32
19 May 2025 Adoption and Kinship Placements

We heard earlier about the role of a corporate parent. That did not make it into my speech—I ran out of time—but although that might be a local authority responsibility, it is clear that today there are many who take the same approach as parliamentarians. Hon. Members have highlighted the opportunity to provide the bes

social-careeducationlocal-government
178
19 May 2025Pensions: Expatriates

It is a pleasure to serve under your chairmanship, Mr Dowd. I congratulate my hon. Friend the Member for Farnham and Bordon (Gregory Stafford) on securing this important debate, and I thank everybody who is here to take part; it is heartening to see what is, to all intents and purposes, cross-party consensus on this lo

social-carefiscal-policycost-of-living
1,533
19 May 2025 Adoption and Kinship Placements

The hon. Gentleman takes the words right out of my mouth, and if he stays for the whole debate he will hear me say exactly that. He raises an important point: we are asking people to care for the most vulnerable children, and if we do not give them the tools to do that, they will not apply in the first place. I am plea

social-careeducationlocal-government
603
18 May 2025Topical Questions

The British defence company Babcock employs over 2,000 people from my constituency. The long-awaited strategic defence review is due any day now, so will the Secretary of State set out how the Government will do more to prioritise British defence jobs, and British firms that will not only provide training and employmen

defenceeconomy-jobstechnology
74
15 May 2025Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill

I tabled amendment 102 in good faith, as I thought it might be workable. I want to reflect on what the Minister said at the beginning of his speech. I do not recall ever being offered an opportunity to pass my amendments to Government officials to ensure that they would be workable. Given the scope of what we are debat

healthsocial-care
94
14 May 2025Transport Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 494)

Witnesses told us that DRT services can face financial disadvantages, compared to fixed-route buses, when operating with private hire vehicles that are subject to VAT. Will the Department engage with the Treasury to consider whether VAT rules could be reviewed to ensure a level playing field for DRT services?

49
14 May 2025Transport Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 494)

Moving on to community transport, which I suppose links to DRT as well, we have heard calls from the community transport sector for a more flexible and simplified regulatory framework. Have you considered reforming section 19 and section 22 permits to support this?

43
14 May 2025Transport Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 494)

This could probably come in under several of these questions. Obviously, the ambition is laudable in terms of the rural franchising piece. Jersey sounds like a great example. It is an island, so there is a limit to how many routes are going to be necessary, based on where people live. Segueing from that, all of this wo

206
14 May 2025Transport Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 494)

Yes.

1
14 May 2025Transport Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 494)

I have a really quick question. I think it could come in pretty much anywhere during this conversation, so I will put it in here. Obviously, a whole load of this relies on local authorities and commercial organisations being able to make it viable. What are you feeling about, or how are you planning on tackling, what w

134
14 May 2025Transport Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 494)

I suppose this is going to be quite an interesting debating point when the Bill comes before the House. It all sounds quite subjective to me at the moment. It sounds to me—correct me if I am wrong—as if you are saying that you want local authorities to make all these decisions, but the Department is effectively going t

67
14 May 2025Transport Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 494)

There is not going to be a central list.

9
14 May 2025Transport Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 494)

I suppose I would just gently push back on the LGR piece again. If it is left to areas that are potentially expanding their boundaries to decide what they think is important, it could still be the urban piece. A council in my area wants some of the rural area, but is on record as saying it doesn’t do rural. If a counci

163
14 May 2025Transport Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 494)

You haven’t answered the point about ringfencing. If it is not ringfenced, why should a council use that money to provide a socially necessary service and not something else? If we think there are socially necessary services, surely it makes sense to ringfence that funding so that there is no wiggle room for a local au

64
14 May 2025Transport Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 494)

Surely they are already not achieving those objectives, so don’t we need to give them an incentive?

17
14 May 2025Transport Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 494)

I think we are assuming that these people are going to do what they are supposed to do, rather than spending it on something else.

25
14 May 2025Transport Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 494)

This is just a point on the definition of “socially necessary”, particularly when councils are expanding. Where I am in Devon, the city council will believe that it is in deprived areas where people probably do not have a car that a service could be seen as socially necessary; whereas if it is adopting some rural commu

146
← PreviousPage 27 of 42 · click a debate to open the transcript with this MP’s speeches highlightedNext →
Sources
SourceHansard · official report
MethodEach row is one contribution (intervention or speech). Word count from the official text.