The Westminster lensArchive · §02 Speeches · 698 contributions

Speeches by Paul.

Every Hansard contribution by Rebecca Paul this parliament, most recent first. Back to the MP page for the headline figures and analysed positions.

Showing 121140 of 698 contributions · most-recent first

← PreviousPage 7 of 35Next →
DateDebate & contributionWords
21 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Seventh sitting)

There is a further deep irony here. The strongest argument for new clause 29 comes in part from the Secretary of State for Justice’s own review. The Lammy review described juries as

crime
32
21 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Eighth sitting)

Thank you for that guidance, Ms Jardine. I would suggest that the legal aid changes are a really important outcome of clause 6. In fact, I think I would come under huge criticism if I made this speech without mentioning legal aid, because I have not raised it at all—well, I did in an earlier speech. I have not raised i

crimesocial-care
64
21 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Seventh sitting)

and warns:

crime
2
21 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Eighth sitting)

Perhaps I am more optimistic about these things.

crimesocial-care
8
21 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Eighth sitting)

I agree with my hon. Friend. Frankly, I am shocked that a Labour Government would do that. It is the last thing I expected of a Labour Government.

crimesocial-care
28
21 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Eighth sitting)

It is a pleasure to start the day with you and end the day with you, Ms Jardine. I am sure you are very much enjoying starting your day with me and ending your day with me, too. [Laughter.] I have just realised how that can be interpreted. My apologies, Ms Jardine; I cannot account for the minds of other Members. To ge

crimesocial-care
1,130
21 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Seventh sitting)

“Criminal trials without juries are a bad idea”,

crime
8
21 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Seventh sitting)

“shows that Black defendants, older defendants, and female defendants elect for trial at the Crown Court at higher rates than other groups”.

crime
22
21 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Seventh sitting)

For all those reasons, I oppose clause 3 standing part of the Bill. It rests on an arbitrary and unstable three-year threshold and asks courts to make constitutionally significant decisions at exactly the stage when the evidence is often incomplete, but then tries to patch over that unreliability through reallocation,

crime
223
21 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Eighth sitting)

The Opposition support amendment 51. If the Government insist on retaining clause 4 and schedule 1, then there is a compelling case for removing the power of the Secretary of State to add further offences to the list by regulation. I am particularly concerned by that unconstrained power. If the Government have currentl

crimesocial-care
101
21 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Seventh sitting)

“You don’t fix the backlog with trials that are widely perceived as unfair.”

crime
13
21 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Seventh sitting)

One of the strongest arguments for new clause 29 is that the Government’s own evidence base is plainly incomplete. The equalities statement accompanying the Bill makes a series of important omissions. It says that historical data for triable either-way offences

crime
40
21 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Seventh sitting)

It gives concrete examples, such as:

crime
6
21 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Seventh sitting)

The Bar Council says the proposal introduces an extra layer of hearings and complication. JUSTICE says that the allocation of cases will lengthen the PTPH, and that the process of reallocation will lengthen it further. If Ministers have accounted for that, they should show their workings. If they have not, the headline

crime
116
21 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Eighth sitting)

If we are increasing the sentence in the magistrates court, I would imagine the Minister will agree that, in some situations, we are increasing the complexity of the case. For example, a sexual assault case could be quite complicated and require, in order to look after the alleged victim and make sure their wellbeing i

crimesocial-care
124
21 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Seventh sitting)

Polling cited in that letter suggests jury trials are one of the most trusted elements of the justice system. That takes us back to first principles. Jury trial is not just a fact-finding mechanism; it is also a democratic one. Geoffrey Rivlin KC put it more directly when he wrote that jury trial is the “gold standard”

crime
62
21 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Seventh sitting)

“are an important constitutional safeguard which help to ensure fairness, legitimacy and public confidence”,

crime
14
21 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Seventh sitting)

Charlotte Schreurs and others argue from lived experience that delay is intolerable, and limited reform may be preferable to a justice system that does not function at all. I do not shy away from that view. Victims are absolutely right to be angry about delay, and they are right to say that the current position is into

crime
69
21 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Seventh sitting)

“Restricting jury trials could decrease…confidence…further, particularly among minoritised groups.”

crime
9
21 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Seventh sitting)

Something I have said before that bears repeating is that the case against clause 3 and indeed the Bill is not that backlogs are tolerable; it is that the real causes of delay lie elsewhere and should be addressed directly. Many of Leveson’s recommendations, including prison transport, case management, listing, sitting

crime
144
← PreviousPage 7 of 35 · click a debate to open the transcript with this MP’s speeches highlightedNext →
Sources
SourceHansard · official report
MethodEach row is one contribution (intervention or speech). Word count from the official text.