The Westminster lensArchive · §02 Speeches · 551 contributions

Speeches by Taylor.

Every Hansard contribution by Rachel Taylor this parliament, most recent first. Back to the MP page for the headline figures and analysed positions.

Showing 4160 of 551 contributions · most-recent first

← PreviousPage 3 of 28Next →
DateDebate & contributionWords
21 Apr 2026Women and Equalities Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1760)

Our Committee is likely to have an opportunity to scrutinise the Government’s plans for pay gap reporting. Do you have some words of advice as to the key practical considerations that we should look at?

35
21 Apr 2026Women and Equalities Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1760)

I will address this first question to you, Peter, but if others want to come in, just indicate. Given what we have learned in relation to gender pay gap reporting, has a sufficiently strong case been made for ethnicity and disability pay gap reporting?

44
21 Apr 2026Women and Equalities Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1760)

Looking at that benefit, to what extent do you expect mandatory action plans to speed up the progress on closing pay gaps?

22
15 Apr 2026Women and Equalities Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1808)

Nina, I will come to you first on this one because of your regional accent. To what extent does where you grow up or where you live affect your chances of working in the comedy sector?

36
15 Apr 2026Women and Equalities Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1808)

Yes, it makes sense. Rachael, you might want to come in here. It is much more anonymised if you are in a big city such as London to perform in a comedy gig. The people you were at school with and grew up with, the people who your parents know, and their parents are not going to be there. Do you think that is harder in

72
15 Apr 2026Women and Equalities Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1808)

Ola, is the growth of comedy clubs and festivals across the UK challenging the dominance of London and the south in the comedy sector? If not, why not?

28
14 Apr 2026Armed Forces Bill (Fourth sitting)

I thank the hon. Member for North Devon for tabling the amendment, and I have just a few things to say. Its impact would be to remove the voice of the victim from the process in deciding the jurisdiction of sexual offences and domestic abuse cases. If a victim does not want their case dealt with in the criminal justice

defence
158
14 Apr 2026Crime and Policing Bill

These provisions are so important. The main thing that witnesses who came before the Women and Equalities Committee said, when talking about the impact of non-consensual intimate image abuse, was that the harm grew and grew, the longer the images stayed online. This measure is vital, and I thank the Government for list

crimetechnologyculture-community
58
14 Apr 2026Armed Forces Bill (Fourth sitting)

It is a pleasure to serve under your chairship, Mr Efford. I welcome the clauses we are considering. This Government were elected to renew the nation’s contract with those who serve, and this Bill promises to do that. We cannot do it without ensuring that armed forces personnel are protected from sexual and violent beh

defence
414
14 Apr 2026Crime and Policing Bill

I know that feeling safe is very important to my constituents in North Warwickshire and Bedworth, and that is why the Bill is so important for so many people. Today I am immensely proud to welcome the Government’s amendment to equalise hate crime law—Lords amendment 301. I proposed a similar amendment in the House of C

crimetechnologyculture-community
493
24 Mar 2026Armed Forces Bill (First sitting)

Although the amendments are well-intentioned, they are somewhat problematic because they target health, education, adoption and fostering, which are all devolved to the respective Governments. They risk recklessly breaching our devolution conventions, including the Sewel convention. The purpose of the Bill is not to st

defencehealtheducation
214
24 Mar 2026Armed Forces Bill (First sitting)

The right hon. Member makes a very valid point. I invite him to submit his speech to the consultation on the Government’s White Paper on special educational needs. If he is going to withdraw the amendment, perhaps he would consider that, and then we could move on.

defencehealtheducation
47
24 Mar 2026Armed Forces Bill (First sitting)

When coming to a definition that everybody can agree on, it often ends up being very narrow, because that is what the group can agree on and apply. Does the hon. Member agree that if we end up defining due regard in the Bill, the definition will be narrow and, by its very nature, bodies will apply it in a very narrow s

defencehealtheducation
73
24 Mar 2026Armed Forces Bill (First sitting)

It is a pleasure, Mr Efford, to serve under your chairmanship. Liberal Democrat amendment 5 is well intentioned, but I find it troubling. The hon. Member for North Devon seems to be trying to create a minimum requirement that organisations might reach and then decide that they will take no further action. I am hugely c

defencehealtheducation
95
24 Mar 2026Armed Forces Bill (First sitting)

I thank the hon. Member for clarifying that, but instead we should push our local authorities and other public bodies to create tailored solutions. For example, I recently asked organisations in my constituency how they are supporting the armed forces covenant, and I was delighted with the response I received. Organisa

defencehealtheducation
149
24 Mar 2026Armed Forces Bill (First sitting)

I thank my hon. Friend for his intervention, and that is exactly the point I am making. We need to encourage the best from all our services, local authorities, police, education, courts and so on. We should not lose the approach of striving for the best, in favour of having a national minimum, because that becomes a dr

defencehealtheducation
90
24 Mar 2026Armed Forces Bill (First sitting)

The Minister has been extremely generous with his time. I want to come back to this definition and whether it will help us, because what the Minister is saying is that we need to educate, inform and work with the champions in local authorities, rather than set up a system that litigates the meaning of “an appropriate a

defencehealtheducation
108
24 Mar 2026Armed Forces Bill (First sitting)

The hon. Gentleman is making a powerful argument; we can all relate to the specific problems that anyone faces when they move house, and that is far more likely for service personnel. However, requiring patients to retain waiting list positions regardless of clinical urgency surely risks distorting NHS prioritisation p

defencehealtheducation
68
23 Mar 2026Puberty Blockers Clinical Trial

For the sake of time, I will not. The need to be guided by evidence is precisely why the current situation is so troubling. It is concerning that the MHRA initially raised no objections to the trial when it was approved but has since changed that position. As Dr Cass made clear, no new evidence has been presented to ju

health
121
23 Mar 2026Puberty Blockers Clinical Trial

No, I am not giving way. We cannot afford to sacrifice the future of vulnerable young people on the altar of ideology. The trials received ethical approval and were recommended by one of the country’s foremost experts in child health. It is vital that they go ahead so that we can build the evidence we need to support s

health
65
← PreviousPage 3 of 28 · click a debate to open the transcript with this MP’s speeches highlightedNext →
Sources
SourceHansard · official report
MethodEach row is one contribution (intervention or speech). Word count from the official text.