The Westminster lensArchive · §02 Speeches · 1,382 contributions

Speeches by Reeves.

Every Hansard contribution by Rachel Reeves this parliament, most recent first. Back to the MP page for the headline figures and analysed positions.

Showing 1,1611,180 of 1,382 contributions · most-recent first

← PreviousPage 59 of 70Next →
DateDebate & contributionWords
6 Nov 2024Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 320)

If you are referring to public sector pay, the remits given to the independent pay review bodies were given by the previous Government, not this Government, and when evidence of affordability was given, no number was given around what was affordable, which, from my understanding, was pretty unprecedented. The independe

98
6 Nov 2024Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 320)

On 29 July I set out £5.5 billion of savings against that £22 billion, and in the Budget we announced, for example, £4.3 billion in the biggest ever package of savings on welfare fraud and error. We are making savings—we have made savings—but that financial pressure still exists.

48
6 Nov 2024Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 320)

We have now published the line-by-line account of the £22 billion. That was published alongside the Budget last week, and it was those numbers that I was taken through on that first weekend.

33
6 Nov 2024Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 320)

Yes. My first meeting at the Treasury was on 5 July—the Friday afternoon. We then worked all weekend, and it was on that weekend that the £22 billion number was put to me, when I became Chancellor of the Exchequer.

40
6 Nov 2024Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 320)

Yes, that first weekend when I became Chancellor.

8
6 Nov 2024Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 320)

We knew there were big pressures coming down the line. What we didn’t know was that they were in the fiscal year that had already started. That was the big surprise—the baseline that we were starting from did not reflect the true spending pressures. We asked the Office for Budget Responsibility to make recommendations

83
6 Nov 2024Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 320)

It was not known going into the election; it was something that was given to me when I became Chancellor that weekend—the £6.4 billion overspend this fiscal year, and that was a number that was increasing, not decreasing. The second biggest component of that £22 billion overspend was £1.9 billion of payments to private

321
6 Nov 2024Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 320)

We have published now the line-by-line breakdown of it, but one of the two of the biggest components of it was a £6.4 billion unfinanced pressure in asylum. This was not just a pressure; this was something that was being paid for every month with no plan to bring it down—in fact, it was rising.

55
6 Nov 2024Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 320)

Thank you very much, Chair. When I arrived at the Treasury that first weekend, it was made really clear to me that the starting point for my inheritance was not the forecast in the Budget from March, and that the actual spending that was happening was significantly higher than that. You can see that in the monthly publ

90
6 Nov 2024Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 320)

At the moment, we are the only G20 economy with private investment of less than 20% of GDP. The way we are structuring our capital spending, particularly through the national wealth fund, will crowd in private investment, so you should see the two together. That is why what Will Macfarlane was saying is really importan

85
6 Nov 2024Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 320)

Yes. There are a number of what we call guardrails around the investment rule—getting public sector net financial liabilities, or public sector net debt for short, down as a share of GDP. The first of those guardrails is strengthening the role of institutions to improve infrastructure delivery—which I know the Chair ha

276
6 Nov 2024Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 320)

Public sector net worth would have created even more space, but I think public sector net financial liabilities is a target that is already measured. It has been measured since 2016 by the Office for National Statistics, and it has been forecast by the Office for Budget Responsibility as well since 2016. I would not qu

174
6 Nov 2024Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 320)

Yes. There is a whole spectrum of acronyms to choose from—

11
6 Nov 2024Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 320)

There are two types of capital investment that we prioritised in the Budget last week. The first part was those things where we can really crowd in private investment and look to grow our economy and exploit—seize—some of those huge opportunities. Probably the best example of that was what we have done around carbon ca

623
6 Nov 2024Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 320)

We’re not in that world, and I’m not going to speculate.

11
6 Nov 2024Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 320)

Yes—I was just going to make a joke at my own expense, actually: the Mais lecture was the longest speech I ever gave until I delivered my Budget. On the issue around African debt and the debt crisis, as one of the largest providers of official development assistance across the G7, I do think we are playing our part in

138
6 Nov 2024Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 320)

One of the really important innovations with the Office for Budget Responsibility is the longer-term forecasts. I think those are so important to try and foster—not just for this Government, but for future Governments—a longer-term approach to policy making. It is no good just doing things that will speed up a bit of g

322
6 Nov 2024Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 320)

Thank you very much for your question. Securonomics is about building strong growth on stable foundations. The most important thing is bringing back economic stability, because we know that a lack of certainty about the path of economic policy creates the instability that inhibits investment. Securonomics is also about

324
6 Nov 2024Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 320)

I think we absolutely have to be doing that, but these things also have to be led by Departments. They should not be led by the Treasury. If a Department does a zero-based review and has a hierarchy of the importance of things, then surely you would rather get rid of things at the bottom of the list to be able to do mo

97
6 Nov 2024Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 320)

And so they should be. If things are not priorities and other things are greater priorities, we should put more resource and more time and effort into things that are priorities. That requires difficult decisions, because there will always be, understandably, vested interests to defend the things that already exist.

50
← PreviousPage 59 of 70 · click a debate to open the transcript with this MP’s speeches highlightedNext →
Sources
SourceHansard · official report
MethodEach row is one contribution (intervention or speech). Word count from the official text.