Speeches by Law.
Every Hansard contribution by Noah Law this parliament, most recent first. Back to the MP page for the headline figures and analysed positions.
Showing 361–380 of 611 contributions · most-recent first
| Date | Debate & contribution | Words |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Jun 2025 | International Development Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 422) “On that point—bearing in mind the complexity and immense scope of the data ask and having seen this first-hand from the development finance side—I can only imagine how complicated it gets when you are trying to cover so many different programmes. Given the burden this can place on the FCDO itself, on partner organisati…” | 137 |
| 17 Jun 2025 | International Development Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 422) “Are you saying you have limitations as an economist?” | 9 |
| 17 Jun 2025 | International Development Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 422) “That is a great answer, thank you. Linked to that, do you think that complexity poses challenges for transparency in terms of reporting on the data and the results of that MEL exercise, certainly to a wider audience? Do you feel it is possible to be sufficiently transparent, particularly given those complexities you ou…” | 54 |
| 17 Jun 2025 | International Development Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 422) “I would also argue that there are a lot of value judgments and subjective judgments made along the way, and then you introduce an element of human error. I am sure you have seen that in practice in all your work.” | 41 |
| 17 Jun 2025 | International Development Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 422) “It is a really clear answer, thank you. I just think it is often very hard for people in the wider world to get into the weeds at that point.” | 30 |
| 17 Jun 2025 | International Development Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 422) “I understand it creates that trade-off as well. But Alex, to sum up, what do you think are the main barriers to the FCDO’s ability to report transparently on these things?” | 31 |
| 17 Jun 2025 | International Development Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 422) “I know we have touched on this very briefly but do you think the FCDO’s use of contractors affects its own level of knowledge and expertise?” | 26 |
| 17 Jun 2025 | International Development Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 422) “Brendan, what systems are in place for the FCDO to monitor the effectiveness of those different contractors in meeting broader value for money targets?” | 24 |
| 17 Jun 2025 | International Development Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 422) “Sometimes that is the best answer. Just very briefly—you already spoke to this earlier—how does the FCDO compare with other agencies in terms of its transparency?” | 26 |
| 17 Jun 2025 | International Development Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 422) “I understand it creates that trade-off as well. But Alex, to sum up, what do you think are the main barriers to the FCDO’s ability to report transparently on these things?” | 31 |
| 17 Jun 2025 | International Development Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 422) “It is a really clear answer, thank you. I just think it is often very hard for people in the wider world to get into the weeds at that point.” | 30 |
| 17 Jun 2025 | International Development Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 422) “That is a great answer, thank you. Linked to that, do you think that complexity poses challenges for transparency in terms of reporting on the data and the results of that MEL exercise, certainly to a wider audience? Do you feel it is possible to be sufficiently transparent, particularly given those complexities you ou…” | 54 |
| 17 Jun 2025 | International Development Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 422) “Do you feel that donors put enough emphasis on the ongoing longevity of their impact, post the end of a programme?” | 21 |
| 17 Jun 2025 | International Development Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 422) “I would also argue that there are a lot of value judgments and subjective judgments made along the way, and then you introduce an element of human error. I am sure you have seen that in practice in all your work.” | 41 |
| 17 Jun 2025 | International Development Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 422) “Sometimes that is the best answer. Just very briefly—you already spoke to this earlier—how does the FCDO compare with other agencies in terms of its transparency?” | 26 |
| 17 Jun 2025 | International Development Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 422) “Brendan, what systems are in place for the FCDO to monitor the effectiveness of those different contractors in meeting broader value for money targets?” | 24 |
| 17 Jun 2025 | International Development Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 422) “I know we have touched on this very briefly but do you think the FCDO’s use of contractors affects its own level of knowledge and expertise?” | 26 |
| 17 Jun 2025 | International Development Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 422) “Very briefly, Anisa, you talked a bit about the earlier stages of a project and what happens during it. Can you enlighten us more on how you measure the ongoing impact of a project after its completion?” | 37 |
| 17 Jun 2025 | International Development Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 422) “Do you feel that donors put enough emphasis on the ongoing longevity of their impact, post the end of a programme?” | 21 |
| 17 Jun 2025 | International Development Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 422) “On that point—bearing in mind the complexity and immense scope of the data ask and having seen this first-hand from the development finance side—I can only imagine how complicated it gets when you are trying to cover so many different programmes. Given the burden this can place on the FCDO itself, on partner organisati…” | 137 |