Speeches by Thomas-Symonds.
Every Hansard contribution by Nick Thomas-Symonds this parliament, most recent first. Back to the MP page for the headline figures and analysed positions.
Showing 541–560 of 954 contributions · most-recent first
| Date | Debate & contribution | Words |
|---|---|---|
| 3 Sept 2025 | House of Lords (Hereditary Peers) Bill “Before I conclude my remarks I will certainly give way.” other | 10 |
| 3 Sept 2025 | House of Lords (Hereditary Peers) Bill “The manifesto was clear that the reform would be staged, and that this would be the immediate first step. The Government remain in favour of a House of Lords that is more representative of the nations and regions, and this is the first step. As the Leader of the House of Lords announced, a Select Committee will then lo…” other | 629 |
| 3 Sept 2025 | House of Lords (Hereditary Peers) Bill “I will give way, then I need to make some progress.” other | 11 |
| 3 Sept 2025 | House of Lords (Hereditary Peers) Bill “It is not my decision; it was the decision of the British people at the last general election in supporting our manifesto. If the Bill gets on to the statute book, hereditary peers will leave at the end of this parliamentary Session. I repeat the point we have heard throughout the debate: there is no barrier to them be…” other | 83 |
| 3 Sept 2025 | House of Lords (Hereditary Peers) Bill “Fine, let me put it this way: the hon. Gentleman is supporting the position that his peers are taking, which is in breach of that convention. I will give the hon. Gentleman another chance, because he is trying to put a defence up on that particular precedent. He supported the closing down of Parliament in 2019, and now…” other | 221 |
| 3 Sept 2025 | House of Lords (Hereditary Peers) Bill “Let me just repeat that point to the hon. Gentleman, because it is important. He claims to respect precedent and the rights of Parliament, but the position he takes in supporting Lords amendment 1 runs a coach and horses through that.” other | 41 |
| 3 Sept 2025 | House of Lords (Hereditary Peers) Bill “With the leave of the House, I will close the debate, and it is a privilege to close this wide-ranging and well-natured debate. The shadow Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster, the hon. Member for Brentwood and Ongar (Alex Burghart), has been treated somewhat unfairly in the course of the debate. The hon. Member for Pe…” other | 124 |
| 3 Sept 2025 | House of Lords (Hereditary Peers) Bill “It is a consequence of the interaction between the existing statute and this statute. I was not arguing for that; I was saying that that would be the effect of the Lords amendment.” other | 33 |
| 3 Sept 2025 | House of Lords (Hereditary Peers) Bill “rose—” other | 1 |
| 3 Sept 2025 | House of Lords (Hereditary Peers) Bill “Quite simply, the amendment is trying to create the title as an honour without the actual membership. That is the difference. I had an exchange earlier about there being no barriers to life peerage; that is not saying no barrier to the title. The life peerage, if granted, obviously confers both the title and the partic…” other | 621 |
| 3 Sept 2025 | House of Lords (Hereditary Peers) Bill “I can help the hon. Gentleman out on one issue: I can reassure him that he is most definitely awake; this is most definitely reality. Where I am afraid I will fail is in explaining the priorities on the Conservative Benches. The hon. Gentleman is quite right to draw attention to that.” other | 52 |
| 3 Sept 2025 | House of Lords (Hereditary Peers) Bill “We have a modern constitutional monarchy that enjoys very wide popular support. It is a completely different matter. I do not think a monarch has blocked an Act of Parliament since Queen Anne in 1714, so I would say that the monarchy plays a very different role in our constitution from that of the hereditary peers in t…” other | 541 |
| 3 Sept 2025 | House of Lords (Hereditary Peers) Bill “In respect of the hon. Gentleman’s bloodline getting to the House of Lords, I am sure it is only a matter of time before we see that. In terms of the antics of the Opposition, I do not know whether the Conservative parliamentary party in the Commons speaks to peers, but it should talk to them about their behaviour on t…” other | 222 |
| 3 Sept 2025 | House of Lords (Hereditary Peers) Bill “I will give way to hear from one of the 2025 ditchers.” other | 12 |
| 3 Sept 2025 | House of Lords (Hereditary Peers) Bill “My hon. Friend is right. One would think that the 1924 debate about bloodlines and pedigree as a basis for participation would no longer have any advocates, but it appears that a number of such advocates are left, a century later. From the Parliament Act 1911 to the House of Lords Act 1999, the history of Lords reform …” other | 122 |
| 3 Sept 2025 | House of Lords (Hereditary Peers) Bill “My hon. Friend is absolutely right. She speaks powerfully about her constituents, and I want my constituents in Blaenavon, Pontypool and Cwmbran to be able to aspire to be Members of Parliament, including in the upper House, and that places are not reserved for people through accident of birth—[Interruption.] The shado…” other | 214 |
| 3 Sept 2025 | House of Lords (Hereditary Peers) Bill “There will be the usual periods in this Parliament when there will be an opportunity, and I repeat that there is no barrier to someone who serves as a hereditary peer being appointed as a life peer.” other | 37 |
| 3 Sept 2025 | House of Lords (Hereditary Peers) Bill “The right hon. Gentleman always makes an individual contribution, to his great credit, not only in this debate but in others. I will not be drawn on numbers, which are always a matter for the Prime Minister and the usual channels. As in every Parliament, the Leader of the Opposition of whatever party will have the oppo…” other | 80 |
| 3 Sept 2025 | House of Lords (Hereditary Peers) Bill “The word “confused” sums up the Opposition, whether on this Bill or any other.” other | 14 |
| 3 Sept 2025 | House of Lords (Hereditary Peers) Bill “It is great to see that the hon. Gentleman is disappointed that House of Lords reform is not going far enough. If he wants to talk about the 20th century and the length of time that his party was in power, I would say that it had every opportunity to bring about full reform of the House of Lords. Not only did the Conse…” other | 194 |