The Westminster lensArchive · §02 Speeches · 819 contributions

Speeches by Thomas-Symonds.

Every Hansard contribution by Nick Thomas-Symonds this parliament, most recent first. Back to the MP page for the headline figures and analysed positions.

Showing 361380 of 819 contributions · most-recent first

← PreviousPage 19 of 41Next →
DateDebate & contributionWords
9 Sept 2025 Windsor Framework: Internal Market Guarantee

I have only about seven minutes left. I will give way to both Members, but I will have to do so quickly.

economy-jobsother
22
9 Sept 2025 Windsor Framework: Internal Market Guarantee

Quite simply it is because, to secure further agreements, the United Kingdom has to show good faith with the agreements it has already signed. The Windsor framework had cross-party support. We voted for it in opposition, so we have to show good faith in implementing it. However, there will come a point when we can redu

economy-jobsother
373
9 Sept 2025 Windsor Framework: Internal Market Guarantee

I would certainly be interested in learning more about that specific case. If the hon. Gentleman wants to write to me about it, I will happily look into it.

economy-jobsother
29
9 Sept 2025 Windsor Framework: Internal Market Guarantee

I will certainly be visiting Northern Ireland again. However, on the diversion of trade, that is precisely what the independent monitoring panel is currently looking at. The panel is looking at it for the earlier part of this year, and I expect it to report shortly. Of course, when the panel makes recommendations, wher

economy-jobsother
313
8 Sept 2025Foreign Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 857)

My message to that business is probably the same as I would give to a number of different sectors. I think what you are referring to is the issue about mutual recognition of conformity assessments. One of the reasons we have the annual summit process is for businesses exactly like the trailer business you have referred

135
8 Sept 2025Foreign Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 857)

First of all, may I challenge the premise of your question? Far from giving away control, this Government are exercising control, and indeed exercising control on the independent trade policy. Let me give an example. In the same month, we secured an FTA with India—to be fair, Boris Johnson, the previous Prime Minister,

604
8 Sept 2025Foreign Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 857)

Thank you all very much for a very good, and good-natured, session. It is much appreciated.  

17
8 Sept 2025Foreign Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 857)

Just to answer off the top of my head, I find it very difficult to see how we can recover much of that. I am more than happy to steer back and have a discussion about whether any of it could be, of course—it is important value for money for taxpayers—but the reality is that the ruthlessly pragmatic approach that we hav

279
8 Sept 2025Foreign Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 857)

We are now going to negotiate the legal text, but the general framework is that first, yes, we are going to need legislation. I have said that before; I think I said it in an earlier answer, Sir John. It is critical that we do that. Again, I will welcome the debate, when we come to it, as we take that through Parliamen

235
8 Sept 2025Foreign Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 857)

It is not a price; it is an economic benefit. It is a strong economic benefit. You are perfectly reasonable to put that argument, but you have to front up about the consequences of it in terms of costs to businesses and to consumers in terms of the price of food and drink. I welcome that debate. I gave a speech only a

131
8 Sept 2025Foreign Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 857)

We will sign up to align on those standards, and it is our sovereign choice to do so. You asked me specifically about rule shaping. As I say, it is participatory. You will have access to things like data, and be able to participate in discussions around the development of the rules. I am not being defensive about this.

283
8 Sept 2025Foreign Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 857)

In terms of the UK-France arrangement, it is a pilot. If you pilot something and it is regarded as being successful in its objectives, then clearly it can be scaled up. That is the nature of a pilot. The European Commission has given the green light to that pilot, so it has that going forward. What we obviously want to

342
8 Sept 2025Foreign Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 857)

In any such circumstance, I will bear in mind the position of the Chair of the Foreign Affairs Committee.

19
8 Sept 2025Foreign Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 857)

Do I envisage relying on it? Well, I do not anticipate that, but I obviously cannot say 100%, because I do not know particular urgent situations that might arise, given that the context of that treaty was in irregular migration. However, I hope that you will take from the tenor of my answer that my general tendency is

69
8 Sept 2025Foreign Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 857)

I will let Stephen come in on UK- France, because obviously there are very particular circumstances to do with that treaty—

21
8 Sept 2025Foreign Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 857)

This is on UK-France, is it?

6
8 Sept 2025Foreign Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 857)

I entirely agree that it is your job to scrutinise. I am a huge respecter of Parliament; I have always loved Parliament and come to be held to account. On these negotiations, it is a question of balancing. You are absolutely right that to say, “Look at the pressure in Parliament about X, Y, Z,” can be helpful, but in m

104
8 Sept 2025Foreign Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 857)

First of all, I welcome scrutiny. One thing I have discovered in this role, given how multi-faceted it is, is the number of Select Committees, of both Houses, I find myself before. It is quite a range, I have to say, but it is a delight to join the Committee for this session. Whether it is parliamentary questions or st

273
8 Sept 2025Foreign Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 857)

No. We are operating what I call a hub-and-spoke model in Government. Obviously, I sit at the hub in the Cabinet Office, and I have to take the final decisions on the trade-offs in the negotiations—that has to happen in one place—but we rely on the expertise of the different Departments. I haven’t been familiar with th

212
8 Sept 2025Foreign Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 857)

I am an optimist in life, and I genuinely think that we can. As I always say about this, when we came into Government, we delivered the Common Understanding within 10 months, which was not bad going, so having had one experience of very intense negotiation, I am at least confident we can get there again—absolutely.

56
← PreviousPage 19 of 41 · click a debate to open the transcript with this MP’s speeches highlightedNext →
Sources
SourceHansard · official report
MethodEach row is one contribution (intervention or speech). Word count from the official text.