The Westminster lensArchive · §02 Speeches · 851 contributions

Speeches by Reader.

Every Hansard contribution by Mike Reader this parliament, most recent first. Back to the MP page for the headline figures and analysed positions.

Showing 641660 of 851 contributions · most-recent first

← PreviousPage 33 of 43Next →
DateDebate & contributionWords
7 May 2025Energy Security and Net Zero Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 816)

I just have a request for Sarah, if you would not mind writing back to us on how the 70% local content is calculated. That feels extremely high and optimistic, from my experience. Having delved into other major infrastructure projects recently that have very high local content, it is quite hard to substantiate. That fi

79
7 May 2025Energy Security and Net Zero Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 816)

Is the impact of construction works a limitation or is it not something we need to worry about?

18
7 May 2025Energy Security and Net Zero Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 816)

Yes, that is fair. I have one final quick question. I will start with you, Sarah. Previous projects have not gone ahead because of environmental concerns over the construction of the projects and the impact that the construction would have. Would this scheme or even a demonstrator scheme have a similar limitation and r

54
7 May 2025Energy Security and Net Zero Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 816)

We can look at comparators, and Sizewell is a good example. The scheme has managed to restore an area of land to almost SSI levels to deal with mitigation on that scheme. Would this latest-case evidence of the ability to deal with mitigation give you confidence in what could be achieved on the Severn?

54
7 May 2025Energy Security and Net Zero Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 816)

Building on the environmental matters, I will come on to habitat regulations specifically. Does the need to comply with habitat regulations present a significant barrier to development of tidal power in the Severn?

33
7 May 2025Energy Security and Net Zero Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 816)

In your recommendations as a commission, you said that Treasury needs to expand the application of funding and financing frameworks based on the model. What changes do you think you need to see from Treasury?

35
7 May 2025Energy Security and Net Zero Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 816)

So we are potentially 15 years away from being able to deliver at scale.

14
7 May 2025Energy Security and Net Zero Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 816)

I was going to ask about funding and finance, but, just before I do, I would like to paraphrase what I have just heard. If we could find the right site, and we do not know where that site is, and if we get public money to do the viability, and we do not know if we can get that yet, we could possibly build a commercial

148
7 May 2025Energy Security and Net Zero Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 816)

You could therefore get the clean energy that homes desperately need and people desperately need to reduce their energy bills.

20
7 May 2025Energy Security and Net Zero Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 816)

It probably does a little bit. One way of dealing with habitat regulations could be the Planning and Infrastructure Bill and the ability to bypass regulations using the EDP process. Would that help speed up delivery or would that create environmental risk?

42
7 May 2025Energy Security and Net Zero Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 816)

I just have a request for Sarah, if you would not mind writing back to us on how the 70% local content is calculated. That feels extremely high and optimistic, from my experience. Having delved into other major infrastructure projects recently that have very high local content, it is quite hard to substantiate. That fi

79
7 May 2025Energy Security and Net Zero Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 816)

The challenge is also that you need grid connection. I imagine this is not in the NESO plan, so we are going to have all sorts of challenges around that. I just wanted to clarify that, because this is a great thing we could do, but we are talking about 15 years’ time, in which case the workforce challenges and capacity

129
7 May 2025Energy Security and Net Zero Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 816)

Is the impact of construction works a limitation or is it not something we need to worry about?

18
7 May 2025Energy Security and Net Zero Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 816)

Yes, that is fair. I have one final quick question. I will start with you, Sarah. Previous projects have not gone ahead because of environmental concerns over the construction of the projects and the impact that the construction would have. Would this scheme or even a demonstrator scheme have a similar limitation and r

54
7 May 2025Energy Security and Net Zero Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 816)

We can look at comparators, and Sizewell is a good example. The scheme has managed to restore an area of land to almost SSI levels to deal with mitigation on that scheme. Would this latest-case evidence of the ability to deal with mitigation give you confidence in what could be achieved on the Severn?

54
7 May 2025Energy Security and Net Zero Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 816)

You could therefore get the clean energy that homes desperately need and people desperately need to reduce their energy bills.

20
7 May 2025Energy Security and Net Zero Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 816)

It probably does a little bit. One way of dealing with habitat regulations could be the Planning and Infrastructure Bill and the ability to bypass regulations using the EDP process. Would that help speed up delivery or would that create environmental risk?

42
7 May 2025Energy Security and Net Zero Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 816)

You would need to develop quite a comprehensive habitat regulations assessment. We have heard that there is still a lot of data missing. How do we avoid over-engineering a solution and the plan becoming another bat tunnel?

37
7 May 2025Energy Security and Net Zero Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 816)

Building on the environmental matters, I will come on to habitat regulations specifically. Does the need to comply with habitat regulations present a significant barrier to development of tidal power in the Severn?

33
7 May 2025Energy Security and Net Zero Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 816)

You would need to develop quite a comprehensive habitat regulations assessment. We have heard that there is still a lot of data missing. How do we avoid over-engineering a solution and the plan becoming another bat tunnel?

37
← PreviousPage 33 of 43 · click a debate to open the transcript with this MP’s speeches highlightedNext →
Sources
SourceHansard · official report
MethodEach row is one contribution (intervention or speech). Word count from the official text.