The Westminster lensArchive · §02 Speeches · 984 contributions

Speeches by Reader.

Every Hansard contribution by Mike Reader this parliament, most recent first. Back to the MP page for the headline figures and analysed positions.

Showing 301320 of 984 contributions · most-recent first

← PreviousPage 16 of 50Next →
DateDebate & contributionWords
4 Feb 2026Energy Security and Net Zero Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 734)

One of the biggest objections is to the action that the Government will take in addressing energy security in our country through onshore wind, onshore solar and expanding and putting resilience into the transition network. From my inbox, the biggest argument against all those things is that it impacts on food security

108
4 Feb 2026Energy Security and Net Zero Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 734)

Is that one of the challenges we face in building support for the energy transition? Has it been such an issue for such a long time that people are a bit blind to it or used to talking about it?

40
4 Feb 2026Energy Security and Net Zero Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 734)

Is it fair to say, therefore, that changes to taxation on farmers is a much bigger issue than climate change? That was a political issue that drew out the farming community en masse, but we do not see that same level of concern from the farming community about climate.

49
4 Feb 2026Energy Security and Net Zero Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 734)

Given the prevalence of the impact on food security and food production, why are the CLA and the NFU not more prominent in their campaigning on the climate crisis?

29
4 Feb 2026Energy Security and Net Zero Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 734)

Judicaelle, I will stick with you. Is it fair to say that climate change is having a major impact on food production in the UK?

25
4 Feb 2026Energy Security and Net Zero Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 734)

That leads me to my next question on authorities that are sceptical of climate change. My local authority, West Northamptonshire council, which is run by reform, has banned the words “net zero”, and has banned training or any focus on it. It even withdrew great council projects from the wards, because they did not want

81
4 Feb 2026Energy Security and Net Zero Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 734)

That is interesting—you just mentioned that there is a mayoral panel. Does Andrea Jenkyns attend the mayoral group?

18
4 Feb 2026Energy Security and Net Zero Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 734)

The participation strategy emphasises collaborating with local authorities. What specifically will you do with local authorities to get them bought in to what the Government want to achieve?

28
4 Feb 2026Energy Security and Net Zero Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 734)

Put yourself a year ahead, when you come back in to see us: if the public attitudes tracker says that attitudes are getting worse towards support, what actions do you think you would have to take?

36
4 Feb 2026Energy Security and Net Zero Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 734)

What are the metrics you will use to judge whether that strategy is successful?

14
4 Feb 2026Energy Security and Net Zero Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 734)

We read your Energising Britain strategy and the five principles of how the Government will work with people, communities and organisations: communicate, listen, enable, grow and collaborate. What metrics will you use to judge whether that is a success?

39
4 Feb 2026Energy Security and Net Zero Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 734)

That is positive to hear, thank you.

7
4 Feb 2026Energy Security and Net Zero Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 734)

I think that you are right that the clean energy mission sits with the Department, but the climate and carbon budget is cross-Government. Do you see as much priority given to that in other Departments as you do in yours, given that the plan you have just referenced talks about fuel and transport? The CCC report is very

88
4 Feb 2026Energy Security and Net Zero Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 734)

It is very positive to hear that the Department is holding a Government-wide view of risk. You just referenced the carbon budget and growth delivery plan, and that very clearly relies on other Departments. Do you see delivery of the clean energy mission being as big a priority to other Departments as it is for DESNZ? I

61
4 Feb 2026Energy Security and Net Zero Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 734)

The Department has recognised the challenge with public perception—you published the Energising Britain strategy—but it does not seem like this big risk to the transition is owned somewhere centrally. Or is that an unfair assessment?

35
4 Feb 2026Energy Security and Net Zero Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 734)

It sounds like there is not a corporate risk register of the things that are impacting delivery, or does that corporate risk register exist for the Department, as a single thing that says what the risks are to you delivering on your responsibilities as a Department?

46
4 Feb 2026Energy Security and Net Zero Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 734)

On that risk register, would we see the risk of the reduction in public consensus and buy-in to the energy transition? DESNZ’s data shows that 41% of people now have a negative view, versus 22% with a positive view, of the Government’s work on energy transition. Would we see that on the risk register, and where would i

68
4 Feb 2026Energy Security and Net Zero Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 734)

Ryan, does the Department maintain a risk register of some sort, looking at risks to the Department of not delivering on the energy transition?

24
4 Feb 2026Energy Security and Net Zero Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 734)

You picked my final question around what the technical, financial or policy barriers are that prevent farms from exploring renewables and exploring renewables beyond solar. It sounds like licensing is one of them.

33
4 Feb 2026Energy Security and Net Zero Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 734)

Did this form part of your evidence into the Batters review—in terms of profitability? A large argument for installing renewables, beyond the green issue, is that you can reduce your costs, so do you think that the Batters review was clear enough on the profitability benefits of investing in green technology?

51
← PreviousPage 16 of 50 · click a debate to open the transcript with this MP’s speeches highlightedNext →
Sources
SourceHansard · official report
MethodEach row is one contribution (intervention or speech). Word count from the official text.