The Westminster lensArchive · Written questions · 1,700 tabled · 1,650 answered

Written questions by Wrigley.

Every parliamentary written question tabled by Martin Wrigley this session, with the full answer and department. Back to the MP page.

Department:All (1,700)Department of Health and Social Care (295)Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (245)Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (153)Department for Transport (133)Department for Work and Pensions (130)Department for Education (119)Department for Science, Innovation and Technology (98)Home Office (84)Department for Business and Trade (83)Cabinet Office (69)Treasury (65)Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office (62)

Showing 121133 of 133 · Department for Transport

← PreviousPage 7 of 7
10 Feb 2025·Department for Transport·Answered
Asked

If she will make an assessment of the potential impact of time taken for construction between phases 4 and 5 of the rail resilience programme on the design team.

Reply

The case for further assessment and delivery of Phase 5 of the South West Rail Resilience Programme will be considered as part of the current Spending Review.

10 Feb 2025·Department for Transport·Answered
Asked

Pursuant to the Answer of 7 February 2025 to Question 27628 on Railways: South West; whether the business case for completing phase 5 of the South West Rail Resilience programme includes (a) impacts and (b) costs related to access to health services in the region.

Reply

Impacts and costs related to access to health services were not considered in the Outline Business Case for Phase 5 of the South West Rail Resilience Programme, prepared by Network Rail in early 2024.

10 Feb 2025·Department for Transport·Answered
Asked

What assessment she has made of the potential impact of not completing phase 5 of the South West rail resilience programme on the economy.

Reply

The Department is not intending to undertake any assessments of Phase 5 of the South-West Rail Resilience Programme whilst the Spending Review is ongoing.

7 Feb 2025·Department for Transport·Answered
Asked

If she will hold discussions with the Driver and Vehicle Licensing Agency on the potential implications for their policy on the provision of data to private parking companies of trends in the number of faulty private parking machines.

Reply

The Driver and Vehicle Licensing Agency (DVLA) would not be aware of appeals made by those in receipt of a private parking penalty or the reasons for them. Appeals are made to the parking operator with the reason/mitigation according to the circumstances and can be further referred for consideration by an independent appeals service. Therefore, the DVLA has no information on trends relating to faulty private parking machines. The law allows the DVLA to provide vehicle keeper data as a first point of contact to allow alleged parking breaches to be followed up.

6 Feb 2025·Department for Transport·Answered
Asked

What discussions she has had with local authorities on a standardised parking app.

Reply

The Government continues to support the concept of a National Parking Platform (NPP), a digital system designed to connect parking apps across the UK to provide a simpler service for users, by enabling them to use the app of their choice wherever they park. The Government recognises the many benefits of an NPP and the depth of support for it across the parking sector with over 200 local authorities having expressed an interest in joining. However, we are of the view that it could and should be delivered without the need to rely on public funding, particularly given the dire financial position the Government inherited. The Department is working with the parking industry to explore options for taking forward delivery of a national platform. The industry has responded positively to this and the pilot version of the NPP will continue to be funded to 31 March 2025 while these discussions continue.

5 Feb 2025·Department for Transport·Answered
Asked

If she will publish the cost of restarting phase 5 of the Dawlish rail resilience project design team.

Reply

A team at Network Rail is currently funded to develop the fifth phase of the South West Rail Resilience Programme. A decision on further funding will be subject to the outcome of the Spending Review.

30 Jan 2025·Department for Transport·Answered
Asked

If she will make an estimate of the number of Russian shadow fleet vessels that have entered UK waters in the last 12 months.

Reply

The UK Government proactively monitors a variety of vessels of interest in UK waters to ensure the safety of seafarers, protect the marine environment, and for national security purposes.

30 Jan 2025·Department for Transport·Answered
Asked

If she will take into account the potential impact on (a) health, (b) hospitals and (c) health services when making decisions on (i) transport and (ii) connectivity.

Reply

Transport investment decisions are based upon the development and consideration of a business case, which assesses the costs of investment against a wide range of benefits to transport users and the rest of society, including health-related impacts such as air quality, noise, accidents, and physical activity. The Department’s Transport Analysis Guidance (TAG) provides comprehensive guidance and tools to support the inclusion of these impacts in business cases.

30 Jan 2025·Department for Transport·Answered
Asked

If she will make it her policy to take into account the potential impact on access to health services in (a) Exeter, (b) Torbay, (c) Newton Abbot, (d) Dawlish and (e) Teignmouth when making decisions on phase 5 of the South West Rail Resilience programme.

Reply

Transport investment decisions are based upon the development and consideration of a business case. Business cases assess the costs of investment against a wide range of passenger benefits, set against the operational cost to the railway.

30 Jan 2025·Department for Transport·Answered
Asked

If she will make it her policy to take into account the potential impact on access to health services in (a) Exeter, (b) Torbay, (c) Newton Abbot, (d) Dawlish and (e) Teignmouth when making decisions on (i) transport and (ii) connectivity.

Reply

Transport investment decisions are based upon the development and consideration of a business case, which assesses the costs of investment set against a wide range of benefits to transport users.

19 Dec 2024·Department for Transport·Answered
Asked

With reference to the letter from her Department to the hon. Member for Truro and Falmouth, published on 10 December 2024, whether she plans to fully fund phase 5 of the South West Rail Resilience Programme at Dawlish.

Reply

The Chancellor has been clear about the nation's finances and has launched a multi-year Spending Review. Decisions and timescales about individual projects, including the fifth phase of the South-West Rail Resilience Programme, will be informed by the review process and confirmed in due course.

13 Dec 2024·Department for Transport·Answered
Asked

What criteria her Department is using to assess the viability of the fifth phase of the Rail Resilience Programme for Dawlish.

Reply

Proposals for a fifth phase of the South West Rail Resilience Programme will be assessed against the criteria described in the document entitled ‘Rail Network Enhancements Pipeline - A New Approach for Rail Enhancements’ published in March 2018.

13 Dec 2024·Department for Transport·Answered
Asked

If she will make an estimate of the potential impact of the timing of the funding for phase five of the Dawlish Rail Resilience Programme on the cost of phase four of that programme; and whether she plans to seek additional funding through the spending review for those costs.

Reply

Decisions in relation to a phase five of the South West Rail Resilience Programme do not impact the cost of phase four, for which all physical works have now been completed. Phase five is being considered as part of the Spending Review in 2025.

← PreviousPage 7 of 7
Sources
SourceUK Parliament Members API
MethodQuestion and answer text as published. Question preamble (“To ask the…”) trimmed for readability; answers shown in full.