The Westminster lensArchive · §02 Speeches · 1,304 contributions

Speeches by Pollard.

Every Hansard contribution by Luke Pollard this parliament, most recent first. Back to the MP page for the headline figures and analysed positions.

Showing 401420 of 1,304 contributions · most-recent first

← PreviousPage 21 of 66Next →
DateDebate & contributionWords
2 Feb 2026R&D Defence Spending: Economic Impact

To deter and defeat aggression, this Government are investing in innovation in the latest capabilities for our forces. R&D is critical to maximising defence ability to be an engine for growth. It is this Government who have ensured that 10% of our equipment plan must be spent on novel technologies, and we have intr

defenceeconomy-jobstechnology
60
2 Feb 2026R&D Defence Spending: Economic Impact

The hon. Member is absolutely right to say that defence innovation has considerable positive spill-over effects for the wider economy. That is one of the reasons why this Government are investing in technologies that have dual use potential—not just to give our fighting forces the equipment they need but to provide ben

defenceeconomy-jobstechnology
82
2 Feb 2026Naval Shipbuilding

This Government have stepped up our support for naval shipbuilding. We have secured the largest shipbuilding export in British history, with the Type 26 being sold to Norway; we have invested in strategically important infrastructure; and we are driving naval programmes in UK shipyards. The shipbuilding and maritime te

defenceeconomy-jobs
68
2 Feb 2026Nuclear Deterrent

The United Kingdom’s nuclear deterrent is completely operationally independent—only the Prime Minister can authorise the firing of the UK’s nuclear weapons, even if they are deployed as part of a wider NATO response—and £15 billion is being invested in the sovereign warhead programme over the course of this Parliament.

defenceeconomy-jobs
49
2 Feb 2026Nuclear Deterrent

Our nuclear deterrent is operationally independent. It supports thousands of jobs up and down the country. We will continue to invest in the skills and technologies required to keep our continuous nuclear deterrent at sea. We will continue to invest in that sovereign capability, but we will also continue to participate

defenceeconomy-jobs
65
2 Feb 2026Topical Questions

I am not going to read it to him a fifth time—my God! The hon. Member is not being serious. He also knows, as a former Defence Minister, that we do not comment on the storage of nuclear weapons, but I am happy to read it to him again any time he wants, so that he can note the word “weapons” in there.

defenceeconomy-jobstechnology
63
2 Feb 2026Topical Questions

As the Secretary of State set out earlier, we are working flat out to deliver the defence investment plan. We are continuing to speak to our colleagues in Leonardo, not just about NMH but about how we are investing in Leonardo’s services nationwide.

defenceeconomy-jobstechnology
43
2 Feb 2026Topical Questions

We live in incredibly uncertain and difficult times, so the clarity and strength of our commitment to NATO matters. Labour is the party of NATO; we helped found it. We will continue to support it and to support NATO allies, because the strength of NATO is the UK’s strength as well. We are going to continue to have a NA

defenceeconomy-jobstechnology
61
2 Feb 2026Naval Shipbuilding

Let us be absolutely clear: any money lost to fraud is money that people have taken away from our national security and our national defences, and that is unacceptable. The Department is looking at how we can continuously improve our anti-fraud measures, and we will continue to do so. As we roll out increased defence s

defenceeconomy-jobs
67
28 Jan 2026British Indian Ocean Territory

Let me see if the hon. Member for Huntingdon (Ben Obese-Jecty) can do any better.

defencefiscal-policyimmigration
15
28 Jan 2026British Indian Ocean Territory

What a terrible example of collective amnesia. In the entire debate, not a single Tory MP could say why they started the negotiations.

defencefiscal-policyimmigration
23
28 Jan 2026British Indian Ocean Territory

I am happy to take interventions if Conservative MPs can start their intervention with the reason why their Government started the negotiations. If it is true, as the shadow Defence Secretary says, that this is a crazy deal, why did the Conservatives start it? If it is true that it damages our national security, why di

defencefiscal-policyimmigration
84
28 Jan 2026British Indian Ocean Territory

It is a curious position to hold: the previous Conservative Government started negotiations because they wanted to act like a trade union. I think that is a poor example. I was asked a number of important questions in the debate, and I am happy to reply to some of them, but I will start with some context. It is stagger

defencefiscal-policyimmigration
219
28 Jan 2026British Indian Ocean Territory

Again, the hon. Gentleman did not quite hit my bar, but I am sure I will get a parliamentary question from him about it. The Conservatives started the negotiations, I am afraid, and they want everyone to forget it. They want the public to forget it; they want their own MPs to forget it. If they cannot do deals, they ar

defencefiscal-policyimmigration
82
28 Jan 2026British Indian Ocean Territory

Madam Deputy Speaker, I have been asked to finish early so that the shadow Cabinet can sit. I do want to ensure that I can get through as many questions as I can before those on the shadow Front Bench need to go and busy themselves in a meeting. I will try to answer a few of the questions. The Liberal Democrat spokespe

defencefiscal-policyimmigration
543
28 Jan 2026British Indian Ocean Territory

No, I will not. The hon. Gentleman has a meeting to get to and I am trying to help him get there. [Interruption.] I think he should sit down and prepare for his next meeting. The right hon. Member for Wetherby and Easingwold (Sir Alec Shelbrooke) was a good voice in this debate. In an important and sound contribution,

defencefiscal-policyimmigration
328
28 Jan 2026British Indian Ocean Territory

I am very pro-Lukes generally speaking, but the hon. Member had 20 minutes in which to speak, and a few more interventions will not correct the quality of his speech.

defencefiscal-policyimmigration
30
28 Jan 2026British Indian Ocean Territory

To help the Front-Bench team get to their shadow Cabinet meeting, I will not read out the same points again. [Interruption.] The shadow Minister invites me to do that, so I will. We are talking about the unrestricted ability to “control the storage of all goods, including but not limited to fuels, weapons and other haz

defencefiscal-policyimmigration
174
28 Jan 2026British Indian Ocean Territory

Oh, go on then. The shadow Defence Secretary can be late for his meeting.

defencefiscal-policyimmigration
14
28 Jan 2026British Indian Ocean Territory

I feel like I have to read out the point for a third time. It is no wonder the Conservatives could not conclude the deal. Annex 1 says that it is unrestricted ability to “control the storage of all goods, including but not limited to fuels, weapons and other hazardous materials.” We do not comment on the location of nu

defencefiscal-policyimmigration
264
← PreviousPage 21 of 66 · click a debate to open the transcript with this MP’s speeches highlightedNext →
Sources
SourceHansard · official report
MethodEach row is one contribution (intervention or speech). Word count from the official text.