The Westminster lensArchive · §02 Speeches · 1,102 contributions

Speeches by Pollard.

Every Hansard contribution by Luke Pollard this parliament, most recent first. Back to the MP page for the headline figures and analysed positions.

Showing 361380 of 1,102 contributions · most-recent first

← PreviousPage 19 of 56Next →
DateDebate & contributionWords
2 Dec 2025Defence Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 841)

The Secretary of State and I are big fans of having defence unicorns. The technology space, and drones in particular, would be one of those areas where I would look to see some of those firms grow. There are a number of firms with enormous growth potential, both in the UK and in the international markets, across the di

128
2 Dec 2025Defence Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 841)

I do not believe so, but I am happy to scrub all those. As far as I see it, I want the system to work properly.

26
2 Dec 2025Defence Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 841)

We are already seeing large amounts of investment in the drone autonomy sector from UK businesses and from foreign direct investment into the UK. There are a number of locations where we are seeing a real investment focus on that. As a Plymouth MP, I would say that there is lots of marine autonomy in Plymouth. We are a

241
2 Dec 2025Defence Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 841)

No, I do not agree with that assessment.

8
2 Dec 2025Defence Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 841)

About a fortnight ago, Defence Ministers opened two drone factories in the UK, one in Plymouth with Helsing and another one in Swindon on the back of having opened a drone factory in Swindon only a few months previously. The SDR set out very clearly that we want to see more investment in autonomy and allocated a much l

232
2 Dec 2025Defence Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 841)

It is pretty standard fare right across our military platforms for there to be safety notices issued and rectification work taking place.

22
2 Dec 2025Defence Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 841)

We want it and we welcome it because it speaks to the wider point about telling the story about defence. The Secretary of State has set out his ambition to publish it. We are working on it at pace. In fact, two of the three of us, if we were not in front of your Committee, would be in meetings about the DIP trying to a

67
2 Dec 2025Defence Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 841)

When the DIP is published, I would expect considerable parliamentary scrutiny.

11
2 Dec 2025Defence Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 841)

Safety notices are a very common occurrence in defence due to the large number of platforms that we have and what we do with those platforms. Issuing a safety notice for a problem to rectify is pretty standard fare. I would not expect every single one of those small issues to be notified to Ministers. As a prudent resp

90
2 Dec 2025Defence Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 841)

The defence investment plan is being worked on currently. We are still projected to publish it shortly. We are reaching the final stages of that work at the moment.

29
2 Dec 2025Defence Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 841)

The defence review set out the ambition quite clearly: up to 12 submarines. To deliver those 12, a number of things have to be true. We have to improve the speed of production in Barrow. A new submarine needs to be emerging every 18 months. That can only happen if we get the skills situation right, and we can only get

216
2 Dec 2025Defence Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 841)

On a standard basis, there are safety notices.

8
2 Dec 2025Defence Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 841)

No, it is entirely realistic for us to do so. It is in the planning assumption for the Royal Navy that we will participate in the rotational forces. It is key to the delivery of the AUKUS programme that we do so. There is advantage for us, but we are maintaining our ability to deliver the tasks that are asked of our su

135
2 Dec 2025Defence Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 841)

We maintain forces that have a degree of readiness.

9
2 Dec 2025Defence Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 841)

Yes, it is realistic.

4
2 Dec 2025Defence Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 841)

I entirely understand. I am not allowed to comment on submarine availability, but I entirely understand the concern you are raising. Secondly, why contribute to the rotational forces in Australia? It is directly because the optimal path for delivery of AUKUS sees the Australians gaining benefits from having the ability

212
2 Dec 2025Defence Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 841)

First, it is one year away because it is a 2026 rotation that we are aiming for. Secondly, I would answer that in two parts. First, I cannot comment on submarine availability, although the Committee will no doubt be able to see lots of that online.

46
2 Dec 2025Defence Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 841)

It is a concern if it is a fundamental problem that relates to something stepping outside of the usual process. In relation to the MAN trucks—it is important to say that that is different and distinct from Ajax—a problem was identified and the system worked as it was appropriate and as it was supposed to do, identified

73
2 Dec 2025Defence Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 841)

At the risk of nodding and saying yes, I will say yes. Let me take the challenge in two parts. If we provide to the Committee our assessment of the key suppliers and the ones that we can put in the public domain, we will write to the Committee with that information. Secondly—you have correctly identified one of my frus

306
2 Dec 2025Defence Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 841)

If I were to look at the photo of the Defence Secretary, the Foreign Secretary and their Australian equivalents, including the Prime Minister, on their recent trip to Australia, where the Carrier Strike Group was docked in Darwin as part of its global deployments, I would see a different but similar image showing the U

262
← PreviousPage 19 of 56 · click a debate to open the transcript with this MP’s speeches highlightedNext →
Sources
SourceHansard · official report
MethodEach row is one contribution (intervention or speech). Word count from the official text.