The Westminster lensArchive · §02 Speeches · 812 contributions

Speeches by Jopp.

Every Hansard contribution by Lincoln Jopp this parliament, most recent first. Back to the MP page for the headline figures and analysed positions.

Showing 201220 of 812 contributions · most-recent first

← PreviousPage 11 of 41Next →
DateDebate & contributionWords
5 Feb 2026Cyber Security and Resilience (Network and Information Systems) Bill (Fourth sitting)

Will the Minister give way?

technologyeconomy-jobsdefence
5
5 Feb 2026 Business of the House

Pride in Place funding is about £5 billion directed at our most deprived areas. I think it is worked out on a constituency basis, and that constituencies have to hit a point on two indices of deprivation to qualify, and must therefore be what the Government call “double deprived”. I have significant pockets of deprivat

mp-performancecost-of-livinghealth
122
5 Feb 2026Water Infrastructure: Inspections

It is lovely to see the Secretary of State; the last time I saw her was in the Strangers Bar, when she was pulling a pint of Rebellion Overthrow—I can’t imagine why that stuck in my mind! The River Thames scheme has been in abeyance, essentially—in mid-project review—since May last year. Will the Secretary of State ple

utilitiesenvironment
85
5 Feb 2026Cyber Security and Resilience (Network and Information Systems) Bill (Fourth sitting)

The Minister came back with an answer on proportionality, saying that it is not for Government to decide what is essential. He missed out the next bit, which is, “We’re just going to regulate critical suppliers and pass laws about them, but we don’t know how many there are, and we don’t know how much the policy is goin

technologyeconomy-jobsdefence
121
4 Feb 2026Lord Mandelson

As I am sure my right hon. Friend remembers, once the Bloomberg leak had happened, many of us said to the Government that now that those things had turned out to be true, we should turn Lord Peter Mandelson inside out as if he had been outed as a spy; surely, had the Government done so, the things that were released ov

mp-performancedefenceother
92
3 Feb 2026Cyber Security and Resilience (Network and Information Systems) Bill (Second sitting)

Q Brian, from your side, what about, say, PPE, gloves or blood? There must be other things that are non-data that are, nevertheless, essential services. Brian Miller: I do not want to step out of my lane. There will be clinical stuff that absolutely would be essential. I would not be able to speak in any depth on that

defenceeconomy-jobsutilities
187
3 Feb 2026Cyber Security and Resilience (Network and Information Systems) Bill (Second sitting)

Q I want to make sure I have understood exactly. Is the regulator going to tell you who your operators of essential services are, or are you going to tell the regulator? Brian Miller: I think we would work with the regulator, but we are looking for more detail in any secondary legislation that comes along. We have read

defenceeconomy-jobsutilities
203
3 Feb 2026Cyber Security and Resilience (Network and Information Systems) Bill (Second sitting)

Q To come back to Dr Spencer’s original question about the scope of the legislation, the current situation, as I understand it, is that there is a carve-out for small and medium-sized enterprises because we do not want to put too much regulatory burden on them, but, under the new proposed legislation, operators of esse

defenceeconomy-jobsutilities
331
3 Feb 2026Cyber Security and Resilience (Network and Information Systems) Bill (Second sitting)

Q Going back to our conversation with the head of IT security and compliance at NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde and what could be designated an operator of essential services, and our subsequent conversation with Palo Alto, how do you envision that bit of the Bill working? Taking Glasgow as an example, while neither of u

defenceeconomy-jobsutilities
120
3 Feb 2026Cyber Security and Resilience (Network and Information Systems) Bill (Second sitting)

Q One of my favourite aphorisms is, “Institutions get the behaviours they reward.” We had a cry from Amazon Web Services this morning about how, when a regulator deals with a company in the event of a cyber-security attack, please remember you are dealing with a victim. I have dealt with the ICO before. Maybe it was th

defenceeconomy-jobsutilities
582
3 Feb 2026Cyber Security and Resilience (Network and Information Systems) Bill (Second sitting)

Q I want to come back to that point. Chris, you said something like, “SMEs find it very difficult, if not impossible, to bear the regulatory burden, so we have to be very careful when designating SMEs as operators of essential services.” To me, that says that you think the Bill, as currently drafted, will place too muc

defenceeconomy-jobsutilities
534
3 Feb 2026Cyber Security and Resilience (Network and Information Systems) Bill (Second sitting)

Q To be very clear, the three regulators we had here today were the Information Commissioner, Ofgem and Ofcom. If they thought that they had a locus because of something that that hospital did, all three would do the step test, they would come up with their bucket of SMEs that they wanted to bring into scope, and those

defenceeconomy-jobsutilities
151
3 Feb 2026Cyber Security and Resilience (Network and Information Systems) Bill (Second sitting)

Q That is a very clear answer on the steps that have to be followed. Do you envisage that each regulator in, for example, the NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde will follow the steps from their perspective? The first one might produce 20 SMEs that need to be in scope, and the next one might produce another 20, and so on. Th

defenceeconomy-jobsutilities
325
3 Feb 2026Cyber Security and Resilience (Network and Information Systems) Bill (Second sitting)

Q Sorry, I misspoke. I mean an SME that is deemed a critical supplier. Who is going to deem them so? Which of the many regulators at play in that hospital is going to decide who is a critical supplier? Kanishka Narayan: There are two things to say on this. There is at least a four-step test on the face of the Bill for

defenceeconomy-jobsutilities
411
3 Feb 2026Cyber Security and Resilience (Network and Information Systems) Bill (First sitting)

Do either of the other witnesses have anything to say on that? Jill Broom indicated dissent. Dr Sanjana Mehta indicated dissent.

economy-jobsdefenceutilities
21
3 Feb 2026Cyber Security and Resilience (Network and Information Systems) Bill (Second sitting)

I meant operators of essential services. Kanishka Narayan: The Bill effectively specifies operators of essential services as large participants in the essential services sectors. I think that that definition is very straightforward. The hospital in this question would be an operator of an essential service. If the ques

defenceeconomy-jobsutilities
54
3 Feb 2026Cyber Security and Resilience (Network and Information Systems) Bill (First sitting)

Q On the question of closer alignment, can you give us a sense from the international picture of whether certain regulatory regimes raise the barrier to terrorists or criminals so high that they are left alone? Is that a national thing or a company-based thing? Where are the flow lines of attack and threat? Is it on a

economy-jobsdefenceutilities
84
3 Feb 2026Cyber Security and Resilience (Network and Information Systems) Bill (First sitting)

Q I appreciate that. My question was about where that leads them to attack, on the basis that they will take the route of least resistance. Where is that? Is that an international thing, a national thing or a corporate thing? Stuart McKean: It is probably across all three, to be quite honest with you. It is very depend

economy-jobsdefenceutilities
134
2 Feb 2026US Department of Justice Release of Files

When the Prime Minister sacked Lord Mandelson as the American ambassador, Ministers came to the Dispatch Box and I pointed out to them that for the whole time he was our ambassador he had been subject to politically fatal kompromat, which left him open to leverage—as it finally played out. I said that if we had found o

crimemp-performancedefence
125
2 Feb 2026China and Japan

I just want clarification on the Members of this House who were formally sanctioned. The Prime Minister said: “President Xi said to me that means all parliamentarians are free to travel to China”. Does that mean that they are no longer legally sanctioned, and did he get that in writing?

defenceeconomy-jobstechnology
50
← PreviousPage 11 of 41 · click a debate to open the transcript with this MP’s speeches highlightedNext →
Sources
SourceHansard · official report
MethodEach row is one contribution (intervention or speech). Word count from the official text.