The Westminster lensArchive · §02 Speeches · 1,057 contributions

Speeches by Mullan.

Every Hansard contribution by Kieran Mullan this parliament, most recent first. Back to the MP page for the headline figures and analysed positions.

Showing 501520 of 1,057 contributions · most-recent first

← PreviousPage 26 of 53Next →
DateDebate & contributionWords
25 Mar 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Second sitting)

Q We are talking about the forward-looking modelling. For example, as you said, you have the data for what we do now and how we do it. But we are proposing reforms. If we wanted to say that a judge would do the consideration and summing up of evidence and the writing up of his thoughts on why he came to a decision, the

crimeeconomy-jobssocial-care
131
25 Mar 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Second sitting)

Q What is your comment on the fact that the Government are asking us to support and understand the estimates of Sir Brian Leveson based on his experience, and to accept modelling that is uncertain, but when you and thousands of others sign a letter criticising them, using that same experience to justify your views, we

crimeeconomy-jobssocial-care
69
25 Mar 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Second sitting)

Q I want to start with a question that I raised with some of the earlier witnesses. It has been suggested that the Ministry in some way, through civil servants, Ministers or advisers—I do not know who—placed pressure on groups that were either signatories of the letter against the Government’s proposals or were persuad

crimeeconomy-jobssocial-care
362
25 Mar 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Second sitting)

Q To pick up on what you said—“do away with”—I think you will agree that we are talking about not the removal of jury trials, but a significant and historically unprecedented reduction in their use. Tim Crosland: What I said was do away with jury equity. Jury equity—the principle that a jury can acquit a defendant irre

crimeeconomy-jobssocial-care
138
25 Mar 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Second sitting)

Q So we cannot take anything you say as being objective on the overall question of whether or not we should do this policy—you have to support the policy. In terms of the modelling, you will have seen in Brian Leveson’s report that he frequently refers to his assumptions being estimates, and to the Department’s need to

crimeeconomy-jobssocial-care
176
25 Mar 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Second sitting)

Q To be frank with you, I was unhappy with the acquittals in all the cases that you have given examples of, so I am not necessarily sympathetic to the aim that you are putting forward. How important do you think it is that the system allows someone like me to be frustrated and not agree with what the jury end up doing

crimeeconomy-jobssocial-care
276
25 Mar 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Second sitting)

Q Thank you, Tim. I am Kieran Mullan, the shadow Justice Minister. To pick up on your final remark, what was it that made you think this issue could be coming down the track? Tim Crosland: There had been a pattern of jury acquittals in protest cases. In April 2021, the Shell six, who had spray painted “Shell Lies” on S

crimeeconomy-jobssocial-care
179
25 Mar 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Second sitting)

Q Similarly to the question that I asked of the chief constable, it is important that we understand the constraints on your evidence. This is stated Government policy; would I be correct in saying that it is not within your remit to criticise or say that the stated Government policy was wrong? Daniel Flury: It is not w

crimeeconomy-jobssocial-care
61
25 Mar 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Second sitting)

Thank you.

crimeeconomy-jobssocial-care
2
25 Mar 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (First sitting)

Q So you feel you are reflecting what victims want. Claire Waxman: Yes.

crime
13
25 Mar 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Second sitting)

Great. Thank you very much; I appreciate that.

crimeeconomy-jobssocial-care
8
25 Mar 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Second sitting)

Q Is it accurate to say that you reject the Government’s central assertion about the time saving? Cassia Rowland: There are a lot of uncertainties behind the modelling. Some of that is inevitable because we do not have the information available. In particular, the bulk of the savings come from moving cases into the mag

crimeeconomy-jobssocial-care
107
25 Mar 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Second sitting)

Q Let me move away from the court to policing, which obviously is the area that you are most familiar with. What one or two things could policing do better, or be allowed to do differently, to enable you to shorten the timeframe on your side of a victim’s journey? Chief Constable Hatchett: I am really conscious that th

crimeeconomy-jobssocial-care
231
25 Mar 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (First sitting)

Oh dear! Dame Vera Baird: Kieran, you are not listening to what Claire says—she is right. The women’s movement is very disappointed with the Bill because it does not tackle the issue of criminalisation of women. They think that dealing with delays in the list is a very poor substitute, and they will not have it. They w

crime
110
25 Mar 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (First sitting)

Q Dame Vera, you talked about Charlotte’s powerful testimony. Would you accept that Charlotte has said it is wrong to use the voice of victims to advocate purely for reforms, as though all victims agree with them, and that she is opposed to the reforms? Dame Vera Baird: Yes, but she is on her own—

crime
55
25 Mar 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Second sitting)

Q Thank you. Are there particular parts of the process that you have observed and want to raise? Police officers often attend court and are often witnesses. In your experience, what are the processes that fall down? What makes you sit there shaking your head and wishing it had not happened? What prevents you from getti

crimeeconomy-jobssocial-care
138
25 Mar 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Second sitting)

Q The other thing that Sir Brian says—this is in relation to the Crown court bench division, but it is replicated across all his major recommendations—is: “Should the MoJ consider pursuing this course of action, it may wish to consider undertaking further detailed analysis in order to understand the potential time-savi

crimeeconomy-jobssocial-care
88
25 Mar 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Second sitting)

Q I have a question for Cassia from the Institute for Government. Thank you very much for the work you have been doing on this. You have been quoted left, right and centre in Parliament. You produced an initial report and then a second one. Your second report was characterised in Parliament, for example by the hon. Mem

crimeeconomy-jobssocial-care
215
25 Mar 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Second sitting)

Q Given your experience of seeing how proceedings flow in the courtroom on a day-to-day basis, I want to talk to you about modelling and the estimates of how much time will be saved. In relation to the proposed new Crown Court bench division, Sir Brian Leveson’s report says: “Modelling assumes cases sent to the CCBD ar

crimeeconomy-jobssocial-care
350
25 Mar 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Second sitting)

Q Moving on to the substance of what you say in the letter, can you tell us a couple of the points that you think are most important in relation to why—although I am sure you really care, as we all do, about the issue of backlogs and the experience it is creating for victims—you feel that the reforms on restricting the

crimeeconomy-jobssocial-care
805
← PreviousPage 26 of 53 · click a debate to open the transcript with this MP’s speeches highlightedNext →
Sources
SourceHansard · official report
MethodEach row is one contribution (intervention or speech). Word count from the official text.