The Westminster lensArchive · §02 Speeches · 1,029 contributions

Speeches by Mullan.

Every Hansard contribution by Kieran Mullan this parliament, most recent first. Back to the MP page for the headline figures and analysed positions.

Showing 321340 of 1,029 contributions · most-recent first

← PreviousPage 17 of 52Next →
DateDebate & contributionWords
16 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Fifth sitting)

I draw the Committee’s attention to my remarks at the outset of our proceedings: our judicial system, victims and defendants and how we manage crime in this country are my personal priorities. That is primarily the reason why I sought to be elected to this place, so I will never disagree that justice should get a highe

crime
594
16 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Fifth sitting)

I accept the first point. If the Minister had said, “Yes, there is a drop in the backlog in those three regions, but we tend to see that because of this,” citing the points the hon. Member made, we would be having a different discussion, but she did not say that; she said there was no drop. On the second point, the hon

crime
192
16 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Fifth sitting)

Although not intentionally, the hon. Member cut me off before I made the point I was going to make, which is that this is unprecedented in cases of this nature, with sentences of this length.

crime
35
16 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Fifth sitting)

Yes, and my hon. Friend did an excellent job of pointing out that although that might have been in some non-statutory documents, we do not know, because we do not have the details. We do not know whether that was included in the impact statement or the modelling that the Government have relied so heavily on to make the

crime
107
16 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Fifth sitting)

I covered that in earlier remarks, when I pointed out that those people are not adults, so it is a different set of circumstances. If the hon. Member is asking me to be ultra-specific—I am happy to be—what is proposed is unprecedented for cases of this nature, with adults, with these sentence lengths. That is, of cours

crime
124
16 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Fifth sitting)

Yes, absolutely. In the NHS, I worked on what we might call change and improvement programmes or quality improvement programmes. We worked hard to replicate the best clinical practice everywhere, but it is simply not possible to directly replicate everything that goes on in every unit, although that is not to say that

crime
272
16 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Sixth sitting)

That goes straight to the point we discussed earlier about why it is important to separate the two, because in this scenario it is the same person all the way through. Ultimately, the sentencing process ends up being separate to the people who decide whether or not someone is guilty, and they will have decided the mode

crimefiscal-policy
61
16 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Fifth sitting)

Again, we talked about this before. There are degrees of fairness. Specifically on whether a defendant will get a judge who is as fair as possible in terms of representation, understanding their background and so on, I think it is less fair than a jury system. But I made it clear that other factors are given greater we

crime
128
16 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Fifth sitting)

The hon. Member has articulated extremely well that these things can be done differently and have a different outcome. I heard about case management directly from Liverpool Crown court. It has an aggressive approach to case management: it swept the cases and was clear whether it needed to be hearing a case or whether i

crime
120
16 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Fifth sitting)

In all the other regions and overall, the backlogs are going up. That is why we have to understand what is happening regionally and why I asked the Minister about that. Throughout this Committee, one of the main arguments from Opposition Members, the Criminal Bar Association and other opponents of the Bill has been tha

crime
167
16 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Fifth sitting)

I have a background in healthcare. The Minister has talked about triage being led by healthcare professionals, but there is another side of healthcare where people can insist on choice. This Government have introduced Martha’s rule, where the family member can not only insist on choice, but override what the treating c

crime
150
16 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Fifth sitting)

Will the Minister give way on that point?

crime
8
16 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Fifth sitting)

Does the Minister accept that there are elements of a jury trial—not necessarily as a whole, but some elements—that are superior to a trial without a jury?

crime
27
16 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Fifth sitting)

The hon. Member for Bolton South and Walkden highlighted the Post Office scandal. She talked about those involved in that case as an example of people who supported the defendants feeling that there was a risk of greater miscarriage of justice, so it is not a proposition that my hon. Friend the Member for Reigate has p

crime
87
16 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Fifth sitting)

The hon. Member is doing a good job of highlighting the whole additional set of complexities of the new system. We cannot predict how those are going to pan out. She referenced the separation of what a judge will hear and what a jury will hear, to preserve the fairness of the jury’s sentiment. We are now going to be in

crime
142
16 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Fifth sitting)

The Minister said earlier, and she just said again, that it was the test recommended by the independent review. But if we are being specific, the test that was recommended was two years. The Government have made the test three years, so it is not the test that was recommended. It is important that the Minister does not

crime
62
16 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Fifth sitting)

Why does the Minister think it is important that some cases remain with a jury trial? What are the material differences that she sees between a jury trial and a non-jury trial that cause her to seek to allow some to continue with a jury trial?

crime
46
16 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Sixth sitting)

I absolutely think that we should leave the ECHR, because I do not like the mechanism that it operates under, but I absolutely support some of the rights and protections in principle that it advocates. I am struggling to see why there is a contradiction. There are lots of times when we might support elements of proposa

crimefiscal-policy
67
16 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Sixth sitting)

As I pointed out, at some point in these proceedings, even the Justice Secretary did not think it necessary. When he was considering these matters, the Justice Secretary agreed that it was perfectly reasonable for it not to be retrospective. We are actually making an argument with which, at one point, the Justice Secre

crimefiscal-policy
55
16 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Sixth sitting)

Further to the intervention from the hon. Member for Bolton South and Walkden, it might be helpful to remind the Committee of the letter written by dozens of organisations representing women and girls. I was very clear that that letter actually represented women and girls as victims, but it absolutely makes the hon. La

crimefiscal-policy
118
← PreviousPage 17 of 52 · click a debate to open the transcript with this MP’s speeches highlightedNext →
Sources
SourceHansard · official report
MethodEach row is one contribution (intervention or speech). Word count from the official text.