The Westminster lensArchive · §02 Speeches · 1,029 contributions

Speeches by Mullan.

Every Hansard contribution by Kieran Mullan this parliament, most recent first. Back to the MP page for the headline figures and analysed positions.

Showing 281300 of 1,029 contributions · most-recent first

← PreviousPage 15 of 52Next →
DateDebate & contributionWords
21 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Eighth sitting)

The consistent position is that unrepresented defendants can take up more court time and can cross-examine victims, and that is more difficult for victims. As other Members have touched on, this takes place in the context of the other things that we have been unsuccessful in changing this evening. Sentencing powers are

crimesocial-care
177
21 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Eighth sitting)

I will not speak at length—much to the delight, I am sure, of Government Members—but I want to pick up on a few key points that have been raised. I thank my hon. Friends the Members for Reigate and for Isle of Wight East for their extensive review of clause 3, and also the hon. Member for Bolton South and Walkden, who

crimesocial-care
450
21 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Eighth sitting)

Yes, absolutely. I have acknowledged that on a number of occasions, along with what the Government have done on Crown court sitting days and a number of other ways that I recognise the Government have improved things. The point I have made repeatedly is that the Crown court backlog prior to the pandemic was lower than

crimesocial-care
282
21 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Eighth sitting)

I think the Minister is accepting that there is no obvious route to judicial review, which is completely contrary to what she said to us on Thursday. I think anyone would interpret that as a significant reduction in rights compared with the existing status quo, so with that clarification from the Minister, I am happy t

crimesocial-care
71
21 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Eighth sitting)

Without this availability of judicial review and a specific right of appeal, we are asking defendants to accept a decision that is functionally unreviewable until—from their perspective—it is much too late. This lack of parity undermines the principle of legal certainty. The necessity of appeal in clause 4 is even grea

crimesocial-care
137
21 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Eighth sitting)

The threshold that Sir Brian recommended was two years, not three years, and the forum that he recommended was a judge with two magistrates, but we are doing just one judge. The hon. Member should be more careful in making claims about what Sir Brian recommended to support what he is saying, because we are not doing wh

crimesocial-care
60
21 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Eighth sitting)

I beg to move amendment 45, in clause 4, page 10, line 16, leave out “one or more of the offences is an offence” and insert “all of the offences are”. This amendment would limit judge-only trials to situations where all of the offences are listed in Schedule 3ZA. Clause 4 relates to the allocation to the Crown court be

crimesocial-care
469
21 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Eighth sitting)

I oppose clause 6, which, as we have discussed, grants the Lord Chancellor the power to increase the maximum sentencing limit in magistrates courts from the current 12 months to 18 or even 24 months. While the Government present that as a necessary measure to relieve the backlog in the Crown court, we must look closely

crimesocial-care
1,807
21 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Eighth sitting)

Just so the Committee is clear exactly what I said and what the Minister said in return, it was in response to an intervention from the hon. Member for Birmingham Erdington, who asked what it would take to get me to accept the Government’s position. I said: “If the Minister wants to intervene on me and say, ‘I am absol

crimesocial-care
264
21 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Eighth sitting)

If people end up being seen in the magistrates court when under the old measures they would have been in the Crown court, there will be lengthier trials and, potentially, a more expensive legal aid bill. It may not necessarily even be an issue of resource; it is just about making sure that legal aid follows the cases w

crimesocial-care
69
21 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Eighth sitting)

Further to that point of order, Ms Jardine. I seek your guidance. We are discussing issues on which amendments were tabled, but we were unsuccessful with those amendments, so is it not perfectly legitimate for us to discuss all the consequences for the Bill that flow from the fact that the amendments were denied? The M

crimesocial-care
115
21 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Eighth sitting)

crimesocial-care
0
21 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Eighth sitting)

The Minister can probably anticipate what I am going to say: this situation is highly unsatisfactory, considering that we will again be asked to vote—not have a view or give an opinion, but be asked to vote—on the system of allocation and reallocation in relation to complex and lengthy trials. Members may have seen the

crimesocial-care
195
21 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Eighth sitting)

I thank my hon. Friend the Member for Isle of Wight East for his remarks. I will paint a scenario for the Minister and ask whether she thinks it is one she will end up regretting if she does not accept at some point, if not at these stages, the idea that appeal is actually serving her own interests in reducing the back

crimesocial-care
538
21 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Eighth sitting)

I beg to move amendment 50, in clause 4, page 12, line 27, leave out subsection (5)(a). This amendment would prevent the court unilaterally overriding a reason to issue a revocation order so that a case allocated for judge-only trial under this section could be tried by jury.

crimesocial-care
48
21 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Eighth sitting)

I beg to move, That the debate be now adjourned. We have had some discussion in private, and I think it will be helpful, while not revealing what was said in private, to illustrate the Opposition’s thinking on the matter. As I explained during our previous sitting on Thursday—there has been a significant length of time

crimesocial-care
456
21 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Eighth sitting)

In earlier sittings, I spent some time testing the basis on which the Government are asking the Committee to accept the changes proposed in the Bill, particularly in relation to the claimed benefits and how the system will work in practice. That is particularly relevant in the context of clause 4, where the justificati

crimesocial-care
1,314
21 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Eighth sitting)

To reiterate, as in clause 3, we risk creating an unfair dual standard for defendants. The Government accept that such defendants should have rights to a jury trial, but they will potentially be denied one unnecessarily because of the circumstances changing throughout their trial, rather than at the outset. Can we crea

crimesocial-care
197
21 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Eighth sitting)

The Minister agreed that in that scenario, there would be no obvious route to the judicial review—as she described it—that currently exists in the magistrates court. If we allow magistrates allocation to be challenged, it is logically inconsistent to deny a challenge to an allocation made by a Crown court judge—particu

crimesocial-care
70
21 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Eighth sitting)

On a point of order, Ms Butler. I am being reasonable. On the matters on which the Minister said she would write to us—the three offences and whether there will be amendment in that respect— I have accepted a letter. However, it is not appropriate to ask us to vote when we are unclear about the implications of these ch

crimesocial-care
160
← PreviousPage 15 of 52 · click a debate to open the transcript with this MP’s speeches highlightedNext →
Sources
SourceHansard · official report
MethodEach row is one contribution (intervention or speech). Word count from the official text.