The Westminster lensArchive · §02 Speeches · 1,050 contributions

Speeches by Mullan.

Every Hansard contribution by Kieran Mullan this parliament, most recent first. Back to the MP page for the headline figures and analysed positions.

Showing 201220 of 1,050 contributions · most-recent first

← PreviousPage 11 of 53Next →
DateDebate & contributionWords
23 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Tenth sitting)

We must give great weight to the evidence we have heard, but the Government’s own position is that it is unlikely to materially change outcomes; they are repealing a provision that their own assessment concedes will not make a material difference to what happens.

crime
44
23 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Tenth sitting)

As I understand it, we are removing a presumption; we are not, in law at least, seeking to put in something more nuanced and balanced. I will come on to talk about some of the suggestions that have been made to us in evidence about what we might do. If there is no clear statutory starting point, courts may need to gath

crime
81
23 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Tenth sitting)

I rise to speak in support of clause 20, which is a technical and geographic provision necessitated by the significant infrastructure developments currently under way in the City of London. As new law courts are developed, specifically at the Salisbury Square site—we mentioned the specialist fraud court earlier in the

crime
301
23 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Tenth sitting)

I want to begin by acknowledging the gravity of what we heard in evidence in Committee. As the Liberal Democrat spokesperson, the hon. Member for Chichester, pointed to, the evidence from Claire in relation to her children will stay with all of us. It was so moving and so upsetting for anyone thinking about how they wo

crime
570
23 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Tenth sitting)

Both Parents Matter also proposes what it calls a parental relationship test to be embedded in the welfare checklist, requiring the courts to consider the

crime
25
23 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Tenth sitting)

“quality and sustainability of the child’s relationship with each parent… The nature of the relationship between the parents insofar as it affects the child”

crime
24
23 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Ninth sitting)

If the defendant is successful at appeal, we might say that they are doubly aggrieved: they have gone through the process and it has not worked for them. Surely we should want to do everything we can to support that group of people, so that they have a route to the mode of trial that they think is fairest, considering

crime
72
23 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Ninth sitting)

I accept the Minister’s point that to insist on that being the remedy is not necessarily what the defendant would want. We absolutely want to support defendants who have been through the process of a trial and a successful appeal. Where they could have had a Crown court trial with a jury, prior to the Government’s refo

crime
79
23 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Ninth sitting)

I understand the Minister’s criticism that the defendant making the appeal may be perfectly content to have their case reheard in the magistrates, and insisting that an appeal be reheard in a jury trial gives no flexibility in that direction—that is a fair point. In response, we will not press amendments 55 to 57 to a

crime
102
23 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Ninth sitting)

On amendment 37, I have talked about the high rate of error and injustice that is being corrected by the current appeal mechanism, and I have talked about the unrepresented defendants who will have to navigate a more complex and subjective system, such as by reviewing transcripts. On the whole, we do not think that we

crime
152
23 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Ninth sitting)

As we have discussed in debates on previous amendments, the grounds of an appeal may very well relate to an allocation decision. Someone could successfully appeal on the basis that their trial should never have been heard by a magistrate and that they should have had a jury instead. Providing the option for a jury retr

crime
106
23 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Ninth sitting)

“power is also never concentrated in the hands of one individual.”

crime
11
23 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Ninth sitting)

In summary, clause 7 represents a substantial recasting of appellate rights that prioritises administrative throughput over the correction of error. We should not trade away, without any evidence of abuse and with little evidence of meaningful efficiency savings, a safeguard that is successfully correcting mistakes in

crime
66
23 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Tenth sitting)

crime
0
23 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Tenth sitting)

I have spent a lot of time working on the issue of victim personal statements, often referred to as victim impact statements, in work on other Bills. We are talking today about someone’s ability to give an effective statement, but the Opposition have also been concerned about restrictions on what people can actually sa

crime
513
23 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Tenth sitting)

The Family Services Foundation notes in its written evidence that removing the presumption risks placing the United Kingdom “outside” its obligations under that convention.

crime
24
21 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Eighth sitting)

In the previous session, the Minister mentioned that she thought, for example, that the test of whether to allocate a trial would be subject to legal interpretation. That was an admission that the Minister made—which is probably self-evident.

crimesocial-care
38
21 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Eighth sitting)

“the ability to appeal a decision to order a judge-alone trial as an important procedural safeguard that ensures that judge-alone trials are only ordered in appropriate circumstances and in line with statutory criteria. A significant problem with not permitting appeals on decisions to order judge-alone trials is that i

crimesocial-care
76
21 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Eighth sitting)

I oppose clause 6, which, as we have discussed, grants the Lord Chancellor the power to increase the maximum sentencing limit in magistrates courts from the current 12 months to 18 or even 24 months. While the Government present that as a necessary measure to relieve the backlog in the Crown court, we must look closely

crimesocial-care
1,807
21 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Eighth sitting)

In their submission to the independent review of criminal courts itself, they identified that

crimesocial-care
14
← PreviousPage 11 of 53 · click a debate to open the transcript with this MP’s speeches highlightedNext →
Sources
SourceHansard · official report
MethodEach row is one contribution (intervention or speech). Word count from the official text.