The Westminster lensArchive · §02 Speeches · 357 contributions

Speeches by Narayan.

Every Hansard contribution by Kanishka Narayan this parliament, most recent first. Back to the MP page for the headline figures and analysed positions.

Showing 141160 of 357 contributions · most-recent first

← PreviousPage 8 of 18Next →
DateDebate & contributionWords
12 Feb 2026 Rural Mobile Connectivity

I confirm to the hon. Member that there is no sense of judgment on the Government Benches on the conduct of her cause. The Government continue to work with Ofcom to improve the accuracy of reported mobile coverage, building on the launch of its Map Your Mobile tool in June last year. I am glad that hon. Members recogni

technologyeconomy-jobslocal-government
1,105
12 Feb 2026 Rural Mobile Connectivity

First and foremost, can I start by thanking the hon. Member for North Shropshire (Helen Morgan) for securing this debate on mobile connectivity in rural areas? I thank all hon. Members for their insightful contributions. While I am here speaking in place of my noble Friend in the other place, the Minister for Digital E

technologyeconomy-jobslocal-government
483
12 Feb 2026 Rural Mobile Connectivity

I thank the hon. Member for raising that point. I will come to that question, because I recognise the gap between the aggregate picture and the experience felt on the ground. Let me return to aggregate investment. To ensure that investment delivers coverage improvements for communities right across the UK, including in

technologyeconomy-jobslocal-government
347
10 Feb 2026Cyber Security and Resilience (Network and Information Systems) Bill (Fifth sitting)

Clause 20 introduces important updates to the information-gathering powers that regulators have under the NIS regime. It ensures that regulators are able to collect any information that they might reasonably require to exercise, or to decide whether to exercise, their functions under the regulations. While the clause s

economy-jobsdefenceother
213
10 Feb 2026Cyber Security and Resilience (Network and Information Systems) Bill (Fifth sitting)

I will take each of those three questions in order. The hon. Member for Bromsgrove raised a very important point—shared, I think, in sentiment across the House—about ensuring that regulators have the capacity to deal with the volume and quality of information they might receive under the provisions of this clause. Prec

economy-jobsdefenceother
216
10 Feb 2026Cyber Security and Resilience (Network and Information Systems) Bill (Fifth sitting)

Although I will not specify prescriptively what the activity and flow ought to be, I can share from my experience that many large-scale businesses—and indeed many medium and small-sized businesses—have a very clear business continuity plan mapping their critical suppliers. In this case, I would expect the regulator and

economy-jobsdefenceother
111
10 Feb 2026Cyber Security and Resilience (Network and Information Systems) Bill (Fifth sitting)

I would not want to imply that every organisation has a business continuity plan, but the simple point is that the framework for assessing critical third-party suppliers is established in business and other regulatory regimes, as I have mentioned. The novelty or ambiguity that the shadow Minister suggests simply does n

economy-jobsdefenceother
122
10 Feb 2026Cyber Security and Resilience (Network and Information Systems) Bill (Fifth sitting)

I thank the hon. Member for asking and repeating the question. The purposes of the provisions on information requirements are focused on ensuring that regulators can conduct their duties as provided by the Bill. I would not expect information notices to require an exhaustive list in every instance, but instead to prima

economy-jobsdefenceother
107
10 Feb 2026Cyber Security and Resilience (Network and Information Systems) Bill (Fifth sitting)

Clause 21 reforms the enforcement regime for the NIS regulations. It seeks to ensure that providers of the UK’s most essential services are complying with their obligations under those regulations. Where they are not, it will allow for more meaningful penalties that reflect the risks they introduce to our society and e

economy-jobsdefenceother
214
10 Feb 2026Cyber Security and Resilience (Network and Information Systems) Bill (Fifth sitting)

I thank the hon. Member on both fronts. On the penalty bands, clearly defined parameters are set out in the Bill, and my hope is that that increases the effectiveness, the clarity and—at the heart of it, to his question—the consistency of application we expect across regulatory regimes. As I mentioned, the 4% figure fo

economy-jobsdefenceother
218
10 Feb 2026Cyber Security and Resilience (Network and Information Systems) Bill (Fifth sitting)

Just so that I am clear, not least for future records, I think the case described is one where the client is not in the Bill’s scope but is provided to by an MSP that is in the Bill’s scope, and where the relevant responsible individual is in the client business as an employee or agent of that business. The hon. Gentle

economy-jobsdefenceother
174
10 Feb 2026Cyber Security and Resilience (Network and Information Systems) Bill (Fifth sitting)

I can see the shadow Minister’s hypothetical point, but I assure him that if there is some universal, consistent practice on the part of an MSP to avoid liability, where liability should reside with them, that should be in scope of how the regulator assesses the performance of that MSP. Secondly, I assure him that ther

economy-jobsdefenceother
169
10 Feb 2026Cyber Security and Resilience (Network and Information Systems) Bill (Fifth sitting)

The shadow Minister makes a really important point: cyber-security must be taken seriously at the highest level—at board level. It is part of the cyber assessment framework, which the Government have put at the heart of how we think about assessing cyber-security in firms as well as public sector organisations. It is a

economy-jobsdefenceother
145
10 Feb 2026Cyber Security and Resilience (Network and Information Systems) Bill (Fifth sitting)

Clause 22 sets out, through schedule 1, consequential changes to the regulations in relation to enforcement and appeals. That is to ensure that the regulations work effectively in relation to the new entities brought into scope, such as managed service providers, data centres and large load controllers, so that the enf

economy-jobsdefenceother
148
10 Feb 2026Cyber Security and Resilience (Network and Information Systems) Bill (Fifth sitting)

Clause 23, through schedule 2, introduces a number of minor and consequential amendments to the NIS regulations, necessitated by the more substantive changes introduced by the Bill. Among other technical changes, the schedule revokes assimilated EU legislation, removes the requirement for an NIS national strategy to be

economy-jobsdefenceother
776
10 Feb 2026Cyber Security and Resilience (Network and Information Systems) Bill (Fifth sitting)

Clause 24 defines key terms for this part of the Bill, and in doing so introduces two delegated powers. Those powers enable the Government to bring new sectors into the scope of the NIS regime and to designate regulators to oversee them. The power will be used only in relation to activities that are truly essential to

economy-jobsdefenceother
140
10 Feb 2026Cyber Security and Resilience (Network and Information Systems) Bill (Sixth sitting)

I will start by addressing the questions raised by hon. Members, including the hon. Member for Spelthorne, who concluded by setting out a general philosophy of how we thought about what is in and out of scope, and then I will address some of the more specific concerns in the new clauses. The overarching philosophy has

defenceeconomy-jobsutilities
1,940
10 Feb 2026Cyber Security and Resilience (Network and Information Systems) Bill (Sixth sitting)

Clause 25 introduces a power for the Secretary of State to designate a statement of strategic priorities for the implementation of the NIS regulations. The NIS regulations are enforced by 12 different sectoral regulators. Although that allows each regulator to apply its sectoral expertise, it also means that at times t

defenceeconomy-jobsutilities
399
10 Feb 2026Cyber Security and Resilience (Network and Information Systems) Bill (Sixth sitting)

I thank the hon. Member for her point. Perhaps I can give a flavour of the objectives I might expect in a statement and assure her of the independence of sector regulators. Subject to consultation, which we would expect in the build-up to any such statement, a statement might include objectives such as encouraging regu

defenceeconomy-jobsutilities
205
10 Feb 2026Cyber Security and Resilience (Network and Information Systems) Bill (Sixth sitting)

The hon. Member raises a very important point. We want Parliament to play an important role in the scrutiny of the overarching regime as a whole, but particularly in the operation of the statement. Perhaps I can break it into two parts: scrutiny of the statement in the first instance, and scrutiny of regulators’ compli

defenceeconomy-jobsutilities
196
← PreviousPage 8 of 18 · click a debate to open the transcript with this MP’s speeches highlightedNext →
Sources
SourceHansard · official report
MethodEach row is one contribution (intervention or speech). Word count from the official text.