The Westminster lensArchive · §02 Speeches · 618 contributions

Speeches by Buckley.

Every Hansard contribution by Julia Buckley this parliament, most recent first. Back to the MP page for the headline figures and analysed positions.

Showing 461480 of 618 contributions · most-recent first

← PreviousPage 24 of 31Next →
DateDebate & contributionWords
5 Feb 2025Environmental Audit Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 439)

The penalty then pays for the resourcing that you are saying is missing. That is quite a useful recommendation for us.

21
5 Feb 2025Environmental Audit Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 439)

On the same point, I was quite appalled to hear how low the percentage is of housebuilders that are delivering these sites. It was a quite shocking statistic. You talked a lot about enforcement. What is the penalty if housebuilders don’t deliver these sites?

44
5 Feb 2025Environmental Audit Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 439)

Do you think that penalties should be quite clear? Do you think that would help in order to—

18
5 Feb 2025Environmental Audit Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 439)

Do you think that would help compliance?

7
5 Feb 2025Environmental Audit Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 439)

The penalty then pays for the resourcing that you are saying is missing. That is quite a useful recommendation for us.

21
5 Feb 2025Environmental Audit Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 439)

Could I just come back in? If we can go back one question to the recruitment and retention issue, I am hearing from quite a few of you that the problem is around the inadequate resource for growing demand. I am just thinking about my previous career in local government, where if you think about other mandated requireme

173
5 Feb 2025Environmental Audit Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 439)

Largely developers now have a kind of tick box, where they know they will have to tick these three boxes to get approval, especially to get into a local plan, so they will just tick those boxes because they don’t want a delay, because a delay is a cost to a developer. Maybe there is a space there around ring-fenced req

91
5 Feb 2025Environmental Audit Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 439)

Your example of the combined authorities, where they perhaps have a pool of people, some of those might be consultants that could be capitalised, but you also need the option for direct employees. Last, on your point about retention, through EDI—equality, diversity and inclusion—policies, you should be able to get addi

85
5 Feb 2025Environmental Audit Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 439)

Do you feel there is any danger that nature and biodiversity are seen as second order priority to net zero considerations in house building expansions, or do you think there is a synergy between the two?

36
5 Feb 2025Environmental Audit Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 439)

We heard from some previous speakers that the enforcement is not quite so strong and when we asked about penalties nobody could scratch around and find any. Is it perhaps the case that although the legal words might be there, the follow up enforcement and penalties is not quite in place and, therefore, it does not nece

59
5 Feb 2025Environmental Audit Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 439)

That is very helpful. Could I ask you, Ben Kite, the same question about whether those two compete or whether they are in synergy, the net gain and the zero?

30
5 Feb 2025Environmental Audit Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 439)

That is such a fantastic example. Could I ask you to write in with more details about that? We are looking for examples exactly like that to help us understand. Could I quickly ask you the same question, whether net gain and net biodiversity are in synergy or are competing demands on housebuilders?

53
5 Feb 2025Environmental Audit Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 439)

It does feel as though that might be quite voluntary. You are providing availability of a dataset, you are asking applicants to tell us first about biodiversity net gain and then secondly to tell us about carbon, and they can access this database if they want to, to apply it. Is there not then opportunity to put all th

90
5 Feb 2025Environmental Audit Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 439)

Thank you very much, that is great.

7
5 Feb 2025Environmental Audit Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 439)

On the same point, I was quite appalled to hear how low the percentage is of housebuilders that are delivering these sites. It was a quite shocking statistic. You talked a lot about enforcement. What is the penalty if housebuilders don’t deliver these sites?

44
5 Feb 2025Environmental Audit Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 439)

Could I just come back in? If we can go back one question to the recruitment and retention issue, I am hearing from quite a few of you that the problem is around the inadequate resource for growing demand. I am just thinking about my previous career in local government, where if you think about other mandated requireme

173
5 Feb 2025Environmental Audit Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 439)

Largely developers now have a kind of tick box, where they know they will have to tick these three boxes to get approval, especially to get into a local plan, so they will just tick those boxes because they don’t want a delay, because a delay is a cost to a developer. Maybe there is a space there around ring-fenced req

91
5 Feb 2025Environmental Audit Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 439)

Your example of the combined authorities, where they perhaps have a pool of people, some of those might be consultants that could be capitalised, but you also need the option for direct employees. Last, on your point about retention, through EDI—equality, diversity and inclusion—policies, you should be able to get addi

85
5 Feb 2025Environmental Audit Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 439)

Do you feel there is any danger that nature and biodiversity are seen as second order priority to net zero considerations in house building expansions, or do you think there is a synergy between the two?

36
5 Feb 2025Environmental Audit Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 439)

We heard from some previous speakers that the enforcement is not quite so strong and when we asked about penalties nobody could scratch around and find any. Is it perhaps the case that although the legal words might be there, the follow up enforcement and penalties is not quite in place and, therefore, it does not nece

59
← PreviousPage 24 of 31 · click a debate to open the transcript with this MP’s speeches highlightedNext →
Sources
SourceHansard · official report
MethodEach row is one contribution (intervention or speech). Word count from the official text.