The Westminster lensArchive · §02 Speeches · 452 contributions

Speeches by MacAlister.

Every Hansard contribution by Josh MacAlister this parliament, most recent first. Back to the MP page for the headline figures and analysed positions.

Showing 2140 of 452 contributions · most-recent first

← PreviousPage 2 of 23Next →
DateDebate & contributionWords
22 Jun 2026School Rebuilding Programme

We are investing almost £20 billion in the school rebuilding programme to rebuild over 750 schools up to 2034-35. Some 500 of those are already in the programme—we have a further 250 to select, which we will do later this year.

educationlocal-government
41
22 Jun 2026School Rebuilding Programme

Yes, I can do that.

educationlocal-government
5
22 Jun 2026Apprenticeships

Under this Government, apprenticeship starts by young people are up. We are going further and investing an additional £1 billion to support 50,000 more young people into apprenticeships with the new foundation apprenticeships, and providing £2,000 for smaller employers when they hire young apprentices.

educationlabour-marketeconomy-jobs
44
22 Jun 2026Apprenticeships

I think we should look at what people do, not what they say. This is a Government who are reversing the decline; apprenticeship starts by young people reduced by 40% under the previous Government. We are taking a range of steps, including supporting small and medium-sized enterprises, and giving greater flexibility in

educationlabour-marketeconomy-jobs
65
22 Jun 2026School Rebuilding Programme

Despite those delays, I can confirm that the school will be considered for the school rebuilding programme, despite those avoidable delays. I thank my hon. Friend for his continued advocacy, both raising it personally with me on a number of occasions and writing to me on multiple occasions.

educationlocal-government
48
17 Jun 2026Procedure Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 48)

I have not seen the terms of reference. Are there particular parts that you would be interested in?

18
17 Jun 2026Procedure Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 48)

That would be great. My perspective is only from the Department for Education, but the issues of written parliamentary questions and correspondence are often seen as one and the same. We manage and respond to them in a similar way, and some of the challenges we have with WPQs are similar to the challenges we have with

122
17 Jun 2026Procedure Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 48)

In my experience, it definitely is not. The Department’s view is that we want to respond within the timeframe set and the expectation there. There are sometimes very inconvenient questions where you think that if the Committee had asked that next week, I would have been able to give them a fuller answer. However, we de

118
17 Jun 2026Procedure Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 48)

My answer to Mary’s question probably covers that. A simple thing would be to move to one model with one set of expectations. There are some characters who ask lots of questions. My one wish would probably be to see some of those volumes drop, but that may encourage the opposite effect.

52
17 Jun 2026Procedure Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 48)

As an MP, no, I do not think so. There are few and far between moments where you would need an answer at that pace. On balance, thinking about what matters most for the parliamentary process and Parliament undertaking its functions—for accuracy and speed and getting the balance right—my view is that one model with one

62
17 Jun 2026Procedure Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 48)

Our performance on named day questions is even worse than on normal written questions because it takes time away from the bottlenecks that we have in the standard process. It is a more acute issue. In answer to previous questions, Tony described how we have tried to compress those timescales for named day questions. Al

76
17 Jun 2026Procedure Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 48)

Very rarely. I cannot think of questions where I have looked at the answer, not been happy with the feedback from the special adviser and gone back around the loop. Some of these questions drill into important parts of Government policy, which, if not totally clear, deserve some conversation and dialogue. That is no ba

74
17 Jun 2026Procedure Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 48)

We have not done enough of that, otherwise we would be in a better place now. However, we are really alive to this. Neither myself as the Minister nor Tony as the official are here today to say that we have had it really tough and the volume means that it is not in a great place and then to make excuses. It is nowhere

111
17 Jun 2026Procedure Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 48)

Yes.

1
17 Jun 2026Procedure Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 48)

Correct.

1
17 Jun 2026Procedure Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 48)

How many— Well, I am not here to ask you questions, Sir Christopher, but I would imagine that you had a considerably lower volume of questions being asked.

28
17 Jun 2026Procedure Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 48)

Tony can say a bit more about this, but across the four buckets of the process, there is an accumulation of delay that gathers through them—some more so than in other areas. With Ministers and spads, the accumulation is greater. They are at the end of the process, so to some extent you might expect that, but it accumul

84
17 Jun 2026Procedure Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 48)

The 19%—which bit of the process does that sit in?

10
17 Jun 2026Procedure Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 48)

And we have four or five spads and five Ministers. The ratio of officials, who are not party political, to appointees, who are able to express the will of the Government, is very imbalanced. The resource allocation of that time needs to be put into the things that are most important, and that is a combination of specia

85
17 Jun 2026Procedure Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 48)

There are a couple of things to say. There is a functionality distinction between our use and the role that AI could and should play in the education system—I imagine that topic was discussed at the Education Committee meeting this morning. That goes beyond the brief of this session. There are really important factors

245
← PreviousPage 2 of 23 · click a debate to open the transcript with this MP’s speeches highlightedNext →
Sources
SourceHansard · official report
MethodEach row is one contribution (intervention or speech). Word count from the official text.