The Westminster lensArchive · §02 Speeches · 837 contributions

Speeches by Lamont.

Every Hansard contribution by John Lamont this parliament, most recent first. Back to the MP page for the headline figures and analysed positions.

Showing 2140 of 837 contributions · most-recent first

← PreviousPage 2 of 42Next →
DateDebate & contributionWords
6 Jul 2026Procedure Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 48)

In the Department, are there particular spads or Ministers who are notoriously slow at turning around written responses?

18
6 Jul 2026Procedure Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 48)

Can you set out the process from when a parliamentary question comes into the Department until the answer goes out? Who sees it and how is it dealt with within the Department?

32
6 Jul 2026Public Office Disqualification: Terrorism Offences

I am grateful for that point. That is accurate, but the fact that anybody would want to vote for a convicted terrorist does raise serious questions, which I think we should be concerned about. Every day we walk through this palace, reminded of the human cost of terrorism. Within these walls are memorials to Members of

crimelocal-governmentdefence
1,126
6 Jul 2026Procedure Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 48)

Sorry to have interrupted, Minister. Please continue.

7
30 Jun 2026Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 113)

How do you think victims, survivors and families could be better taken into account when considering whether to allow an inquiry?

21
30 Jun 2026Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 113)

Under the current system, it is at the discretion of the Minister and the Government whether an inquiry happens. Under your proposal for PACAC, for this Committee to consider it, would it need to be more formalised in terms of the thresholds, outcomes and the different scenarios you described?

49
30 Jun 2026Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 113)

Again, thinking about the victims and those affected by this, in your 2025 additional report, you recommended that the compensation authority should cease using the invite system, which was designed to control who was prioritised and when, and instead go to a more simple application process. While the IBCA has stated p

85
30 Jun 2026Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 113)

You recommended that if there is sufficient support within Parliament, there should be a mechanism by which a question is put to PACAC—this Committee—to consider whether the inquiry should proceed or not. How do you envisage that mechanism working in practice?

41
30 Jun 2026Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 113)

Sir Brian, in your report into the infected bloods, one of your recommendations was that members of the community should be an integral part of the Infected Blood Compensation Authority board. In practice, a separate panel has been created. What are your thoughts on that? Do you think that undermines that principle, gi

78
30 Jun 2026Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 113)

Yes. In terms of how we would go from somebody calling for an inquiry, that coming to Parliament and arriving with the Committee, and what sort of factors we might want to consider.

33
30 Jun 2026Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 113)

Ms Richards, do you have any thoughts on this?

9
30 Jun 2026Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 113)

I guess I asked that question because, for those affected by whatever the event might be, there may be a feeling that all that energy and investment goes into having the inquiry, and gets outcomes and recommendations from experts like yourself, only for the Government, for whatever reason, not to follow through. Clearl

81
30 Jun 2026Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 113)

So that would not be the power to reverse the decision, but the power to scrutinise more closely the reasons behind that decision.

23
25 Jun 2026Topical Questions

T5. Yesterday, I asked the Prime Minister to launch an inquiry into the Peter Murrell scandal, because the SNP Government in Scotland refuse to do so. The High Court judge said that Murrell’s crimes were “not particularly sophisticated”, demolishing any suggestion that he somehow deceived everyone in the SNP. The peopl

economy-jobstechnologydefence
87
24 Jun 2026Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 246)

Do you think somebody who has worked in the private sector has skills that might complement that, or do you think working in the public sector is a unique role? Clearly, we need a range of skills in people, but is there something that the private sector can offer and that people who have spent their working life only i

69
24 Jun 2026Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 246)

What skills do you think a successful candidate to sit on or to chair a public board would have?

19
24 Jun 2026Engagements

Q12. May I start by wishing Scotland well in their match tonight against Brazil? Following the conviction of former SNP chief executive Peter Murrell for embezzlement, serious questions about governance and oversight remain unanswered. The Scottish Government are refusing to establish an inquiry, despite clear public c

mp-performancehealthdefence
90
24 Jun 2026Farming Road Map and Profitability Review

I was at the Royal Highland Show last week and farmers from across the UK were in their usual high spirits, but there is a real concern about the profitability and the future of farming. The SPS agreement, the price of fuel, red tape, the family farm tax and fertiliser are all big concerns. What specifically are the Go

agricultureeconomy-jobsenvironment
64
24 Jun 2026Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 246)

What do you think makes a good public appointments process?

10
23 Jun 2026Modernisation Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 152)

Sir David, can I go back to something you said earlier in response to how time is allocated in Westminster Hall on the Tuesdays and Wednesdays and by the Chairman of Ways and Means through the Speaker’s ballot. You suggested that sometimes people get preferential treatment in that ballot. Did I misunderstand what you w

79
← PreviousPage 2 of 42 · click a debate to open the transcript with this MP’s speeches highlightedNext →
Sources
SourceHansard · official report
MethodEach row is one contribution (intervention or speech). Word count from the official text.