Speeches by Grady.
Every Hansard contribution by John Grady this parliament, most recent first. Back to the MP page for the headline figures and analysed positions.
Showing 681–700 of 796 contributions · most-recent first
| Date | Debate & contribution | Words |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Feb 2025 | Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 687) “One aspect of the spending review is the challenge panels of external experts. On them are former senior management from Lloyds, Barclays and the Co-operative Group. Who else is on those panels?” | 32 |
| 12 Feb 2025 | Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 687) “How will this relate to the work of the Office for Value for Money? Will that team talk to these individual other teams? How is that going to work?” | 29 |
| 12 Feb 2025 | Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 687) “Is part of the process that, as a matter of course, these external experts must report in writing to the Treasury so that ultimately Darren Jones and Rachel Reeves can see what they have said?” | 35 |
| 12 Feb 2025 | Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 687) “Let’s say I am sitting in a Department and I have been asked for my opinion, and I am feeling a bit grumpy because it has been ignored—a bit like at home. Will my concern about a spending proposal find its way from the Department to the OVFM or the Treasury as a matter of course?” | 56 |
| 12 Feb 2025 | Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 687) “Have I understood that correctly, and could you explain to us how that would work to get growth? If I were a bank, I would think, “Let’s keep it in the current account and not move it into an interest-bearing account.”” | 41 |
| 12 Feb 2025 | Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 687) “The last question from me: have I understood right that the OVFM has so far given one recommendation, or is there more?” | 22 |
| 12 Feb 2025 | Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 687) “So just one so far, but there will be more to come.” | 12 |
| 12 Feb 2025 | Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 687) “Perhaps we can be efficient and do a yes/no, Mr Bowler. If I understood your example correctly, one of the rules you would like to change to get some more growth is to enable banks to target people with large current account balances and encourage them to move them into interest-bearing savings accounts. Did I pick tha…” | 59 |
| 12 Feb 2025 | Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 687) “I guess—and it is one for the letter, because I do not want to try Dame Meg’s patience—I do not see the incentive for a bank, if someone habitually keeps £30,000 in their current account doing nothing, to encourage that customer to move it to a savings account, unless maybe it is some sort of longer-term savings accoun…” | 58 |
| 12 Feb 2025 | Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 687) “Right, okay.” | 2 |
| 12 Feb 2025 | Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 687) “Then we can move on.” | 5 |
| 11 Feb 2025 | Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 685) “To be clear, by disclosure to the public what I mean is you say, “This is what AI is actually doing in a physical, step-by-step process.”” | 26 |
| 11 Feb 2025 | Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 685) “Just to quickly pick up on the Consumer Credit Act—something that has been troubling me for some time, so I am in agreement—it does not really cover all the modern methods of payment that are coming up. I suspect that what you are saying, ultimately, is that it forms part of that picture that Mr Glen and I have been di…” | 75 |
| 11 Feb 2025 | Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 685) “Mr Dipple-Johnstone, with all your other regulatory experience, it is a yes or no question: is it working for consumers and businesses?” | 22 |
| 11 Feb 2025 | Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 685) “Of course. I understand the overall regulatory architecture. I am just asking a very simple question: is the system too complex, and is it working for consumers and businesses?” | 29 |
| 11 Feb 2025 | Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 685) “I have one other question. Looking at the car loans overall, there are a lot of cooks and a lot of appeal routes in this world. You have common law statute and FCA rules. The FCA will make a decision, and then there is a potential for a judicial review all the way to the Supreme Court. You can make decisions and then y…” | 228 |
| 11 Feb 2025 | Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 685) “Mr Dipple-Johnstone, you mentioned the use of AI. Is AI being used in dealing with these cases?” | 17 |
| 11 Feb 2025 | Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 685) “I struggle, then, because you must have reached a view as an organisation as to what you are likely to have to disclose. Why can you not disclose this to this Committee? I am lost.” | 35 |
| 11 Feb 2025 | Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 685) “Would you please give me leave to finish, Baroness Manzoor? Now, in the ordinary course, when you reach an agreement in any large organisation you consider, identify and crystallise what the likely disclosure requirements are at the time. I struggle with the notion that you would not know whether you have to disclose t…” | 59 |
| 11 Feb 2025 | Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 685) “Baroness Manzoor, if I may interrupt, you have reached a mutual agreement, but you cannot say when the agreement was agreed—” | 21 |