The Westminster lensArchive · §02 Speeches · 796 contributions

Speeches by Grady.

Every Hansard contribution by John Grady this parliament, most recent first. Back to the MP page for the headline figures and analysed positions.

Showing 661680 of 796 contributions · most-recent first

← PreviousPage 34 of 40Next →
DateDebate & contributionWords
26 Feb 2025Grenfell Tower Inquiry: Phase 2 Report

In my constituency, tenants in social housing are regularly treated as second-class citizens, and it is a shame and a stain on our society that that is so. Many of my constituents are desperately worried about cladding remediation following the terror of Grenfell. The Scottish Government received about £97 million from

housinglocal-governmentcrime
183
26 Feb 2025Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 607)

That is a very interesting point, Ms Fairweather. I suspect you would need a whole new inquiry on saving for self-employed people, actually. The Hargreaves Lansdown evidence is that 47.3% of outright homeowners are on track for a moderate retirement income. It is a bit late for complex maths, so that means over 50% are

113
26 Feb 2025Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 607)

That is a very interesting point, Mr Byrnes. I suppose I would ask the rest of the panel whether they agree. Are we confusing two things: the rainy day fund you need for medical emergencies and all the rest of it, and long-term pension saving? Does that easier access for pension saving point away from this being a good

61
26 Feb 2025Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 607)

Would anyone demur from what Ms Fairweather has said?

9
26 Feb 2025Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 607)

Just to set out the landscape a little bit so we are all on the same page, because this can get quite complicated, if I have a SIPP, I get tax relief on the way in, at my marginal rate of tax. If I have a LISA, I get a bonus, although obviously there is a withdrawal penalty. If I have an ISA, there are no additional ta

280
26 Feb 2025Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 607)

It is 73p.

3
26 Feb 2025Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 607)

That is a brilliant answer: one word. Thank you very much.

11
26 Feb 2025Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 607)

Can I have very quick answers, please, because time is marching on, and perhaps one answer at a time? The SIPP minimum pension age, I think, is currently 55 and going up to 57, if I am right, in 2028. We have a different state pension age and then the LISA age is 60. Is this another example of confusion in the pensions

64
26 Feb 2025Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 607)

Can I have a yes/no answer from Ms Olufunwa as well?

11
26 Feb 2025Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 607)

My question to each of the panel has rather a yes/no answer, I hope. That minor disagreement we have seen between Mr Lewis and Mr Johnson turns on a range of modelling features: tax in, tax out, whether you get employer matching contributions, your investment choice, whether that investment choice is available and whet

108
26 Feb 2025Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 607)

As a final question from me, because time is marching on, does this discussion really illustrate the fundamental problem here: that it is all just too complicated for people to save in this country?

34
25 Feb 2025Defence and Security

I thank the Prime Minister for his statement, with which I agree. Does he agree that Clement Attlee and Ernest Bevin showed that the defence of the United Kingdom and Europe against totalitarianism is at the core of this House’s values and those of our party? Does he also agree that what we can learn from their great p

defenceeconomy-jobs
95
12 Feb 2025Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 687)

Has the Office for Value for Money found us any savings yet?

12
12 Feb 2025Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 687)

Could you follow up in writing just to set out how you will do that?

15
12 Feb 2025Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 687)

The National Wealth Fund’s predecessor, the UK Infrastructure Bank, led to a regeneration project in Teesside, the value for money of which some have questioned. It is probably best for the panel to answer these questions with either a yes or a no, and then follow up in writing, because time is marching on. Will the Na

87
12 Feb 2025Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 687)

No, that’s fine; that has covered my point.

8
12 Feb 2025Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 687)

But one is weighing up different expenditure lines and different expenditure proposals, so surely they need to be assessed to some common parameters, to have some sort of output that gives comparability.

32
12 Feb 2025Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 687)

What process are they going to follow? Is there a standard process for assessing value for money, or are they all going to have their own process?

27
12 Feb 2025Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 687)

How have these people been selected? At first sight, one might ask how someone from Lloyds Banking Group, for instance, could help with various aspects of public expenditure.

28
12 Feb 2025Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 687)

That is very helpful. It might be helpful if you provided the Committee afterwards with a list of who the challenge experts are.

23
← PreviousPage 34 of 40 · click a debate to open the transcript with this MP’s speeches highlightedNext →
Sources
SourceHansard · official report
MethodEach row is one contribution (intervention or speech). Word count from the official text.