The Westminster lensArchive · §02 Speeches · 610 contributions

Speeches by McMahon.

Every Hansard contribution by Jim McMahon this parliament, most recent first. Back to the MP page for the headline figures and analysed positions.

Showing 541560 of 610 contributions · most-recent first

← PreviousPage 28 of 31Next →
DateDebate & contributionWords
11 Dec 2024Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers and Private Schools) Bill (First sitting)

Q On the point that you made about the potential to improve the system more generally, clearly we want this to be a measure that supports the fabric of community. In the end, these are retail businesses, but they are often the places that bind communities together. That is very much the way that we as a Government perc

fiscal-policylocal-governmenteconomy-jobs
231
11 Dec 2024Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers and Private Schools) Bill (First sitting)

Q Thank you for giving time to give evidence today, Mr Woodall. You explained the nature of your members and the fact that their businesses are very much anchors of the community. They are the place that provides the food, but also, in many places, they provide access to finance, post office facilities, postal services

fiscal-policylocal-governmenteconomy-jobs
197
11 Dec 2024Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers and Private Schools) Bill (First sitting)

Q Leading on from that, one of the other measures in the proposals would remove the current cap on the temporary relief so that multiple operators, including national operators such as the Co-op and others, will benefit more from this scheme. I am interested in your view, because you will no doubt have a view on the ta

fiscal-policylocal-governmenteconomy-jobs
300
11 Dec 2024Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers and Private Schools) Bill (First sitting)

Q For the record, I refer to my entry in the Register of Members’ Financial Interests. Mr Gerrard, many of the stores that you operate are not on the high street or in town and city centres; they are often the last remaining store on the estate in a community. How do you think this Bill might contribute to making those

fiscal-policylocal-governmenteconomy-jobs
464
11 Dec 2024Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers and Private Schools) Bill (First sitting)

Q The first part of the question was more about how agile the system can be. Providing for secondary legislation as part of this Bill is about having that agility and being able to move to recognise any shocks in the system to ensure that, if there is a hit to the local economy, or the high street in particular, the sy

fiscal-policylocal-governmenteconomy-jobs
151
11 Dec 2024Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers and Private Schools) Bill (First sitting)

Q On that point, is that not why this measure is so important? If we think about the types of shocks that many businesses face, the pandemic was exceptional but also profound. Having that flexibility to move quickly and adapt was very important to the system. With the current system, aside from it being temporary, shor

fiscal-policylocal-governmenteconomy-jobs
230
11 Dec 2024Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers and Private Schools) Bill (First sitting)

Q Thank you, Mr Watson, for taking the time to be here and for the insight you have provided on that first question. I am interested in the point about the number of multipliers. If I understand you correctly, there is a risk that the more multipliers you provide, the more confusion there might be in the system. Howeve

fiscal-policylocal-governmenteconomy-jobs
495
11 Dec 2024Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers and Private Schools) Bill (Second sitting)

Q My next point is about the accommodation that we have sought to make for SEND pupils, in particular for those schools with a majority of pupils in that category. We recognise that that is an important part of the school system overall. Many councils contract to such schools to ensure that children who need the suppor

fiscal-policylocal-governmenteducation
189
11 Dec 2024Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers and Private Schools) Bill (Second sitting)

Q Thank you for taking the time to give evidence and for your direct and matter-of-fact responses, which in a debate that can be emotive is very welcome to an evidence Committee. The Government want to ensure that, in seeing the legislation through, we fully take into account the likely impact on the school system and

fiscal-policylocal-governmenteducation
290
11 Dec 2024Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers and Private Schools) Bill (Second sitting)

Q This part of the sector is unique in that turnover is so closely aligned to rateable value in a way that is different from other parts of the system. We accept that. You will know about this from your members, and I hear it all the time as a constituency MP—I have large family brewery, JW Lees, that operates heavily

fiscal-policylocal-governmenteducation
424
11 Dec 2024Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers and Private Schools) Bill (Second sitting)

Q Thank you for giving evidence, and for the insight that you provided, which I thought was very comprehensive and gave a good insight into the industry. We all accept just how important pubs are, not just to the economy, but to our communities. In many places, they are where communities come together, where families m

fiscal-policylocal-governmenteducation
1,247
11 Dec 2024Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers and Private Schools) Bill (Second sitting)

Q But not on this measure. I am happy to conclude my remarks.

fiscal-policylocal-governmenteducation
13
11 Dec 2024Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers and Private Schools) Bill (Second sitting)

These are evidence sessions where we try to glean insights that we have not previously had to inform the Bill and any potential changes. But I am struggling to get from the evidence so far a real sense of the impact. If there is a pound for pound impact with this measure—the business rate treatment for private schools—

fiscal-policylocal-governmenteducation
126
11 Dec 2024Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers and Private Schools) Bill (Second sitting)

Q If it is a stalking horse, it is a fairly mild one. The impact, even if every pound was passed on per pupil, is just over £300 a year—less than £1 a day. Dr James: I am sorry; I am having difficulty hearing what you are saying.

fiscal-policylocal-governmenteducation
48
11 Dec 2024Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers and Private Schools) Bill (Second sitting)

Q But those are provided for in the scope of the proposed legislation. Schools that have more than half of their intake of children in that situation would be exempt—for those in receipt of a local authority EHCP. Dr James: That indicates how far there is a problem with this and how far this is being used as a stalking

fiscal-policylocal-governmenteducation
72
11 Dec 2024Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers and Private Schools) Bill (Second sitting)

I think that rather than hearing a case from the evidence sessions that asserts that this does not need to happen, which we have just spent five minutes doing, it would be helpful to get a sense from you, given that the decision has been made to do this, of your assessment of the impact and the mitigations you would pr

fiscal-policylocal-governmenteducation
175
11 Dec 2024Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers and Private Schools) Bill (First sitting)

Q Is part of the tension not that the question described a broken market, but that response describes a functioning market? Is the real issue that many institutional investors would sooner have an empty property with a notional rent attached to it, even if the rent is never achieved, than accept a tenant for a lower re

fiscal-policylocal-governmenteconomy-jobs
168
11 Dec 2024Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers and Private Schools) Bill (First sitting)

Q I accept that up to a point, but the temporary relief that the previous Government brought in to cover the impact of covid on the high street and retail, hospitality and leisure was introduced at a time when the sector was decimated and the country and the economy changed beyond recognition, in a way that none of us

fiscal-policylocal-governmenteconomy-jobs
315
11 Dec 2024Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers and Private Schools) Bill (First sitting)

Q Thank you for coming to give evidence today, Mr Adam. I absolutely accept what you said—you are far more qualified than me on these matters, and I will not try to test some of it. However, I can say from my experience in Oldham that businesses are asking for respite and that they have found things very difficult. Alt

fiscal-policylocal-governmenteconomy-jobs
364
11 Dec 2024Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers and Private Schools) Bill (Second sitting)

Q What I was trying to get to more was—to say “evidence” would be pushing it too far—the assessment that has been made of the impact. We hear language like, “Our parents are aspirational,” but all parents, by and large, are aspirational, regardless of the school their children go to. I am aspirational, and my son goes

fiscal-policylocal-governmenteducation
240
← PreviousPage 28 of 31 · click a debate to open the transcript with this MP’s speeches highlightedNext →
Sources
SourceHansard · official report
MethodEach row is one contribution (intervention or speech). Word count from the official text.