The Westminster lensArchive · §02 Speeches · 717 contributions

Speeches by Norman.

Every Hansard contribution by Jesse Norman this parliament, most recent first. Back to the MP page for the headline figures and analysed positions.

Showing 401420 of 717 contributions · most-recent first

← PreviousPage 21 of 36Next →
DateDebate & contributionWords
21 Oct 2025Defence Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 841)

So what was the worry about starting on time? Where is the concern?

13
21 Oct 2025Defence Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 841)

Missing one prejudices the whole thing.

6
21 Oct 2025Defence Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 841)

What is the next step that needs to be hit, as part of that recapitalisation process?

16
21 Oct 2025Defence Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 841)

Harry and Steve, are things on schedule?

7
21 Oct 2025Defence Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 841)

Someone suggested to me that there are not enough engineers in Australia currently to maintain a Virginia-class sub, let alone build one.

22
21 Oct 2025Defence Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 841)

Your point is that they are on track at the moment, but the balance between sustainment and build is wrong. Is that right?

23
21 Oct 2025Defence Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 841)

Steve Timms, what is your view on the schedule? Are we on schedule at the moment?

16
21 Oct 2025Defence Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 841)

So you have a concern about a rebalancing away from design and build, within the spend envelope, towards operation, because that would prejudice the design and build phase, which you think is so important. Is that right?

37
21 Oct 2025Defence Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 841)

It sounds as though there is a need for a rebalancing, but no one quite wants to say that that means taking less money from one and putting it into the other.

32
21 Oct 2025Defence Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 841)

How good is the road map in terms of future funding from the MoD? Can you actually see it? Is it clear enough? Are you getting the demand signal you need? In this Committee, we have a big worry about intensity, urgency, readiness, firmness of purpose, follow-through and red tape. You have seen the Chancellor talking to

70
21 Oct 2025Defence Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 841)

Thank you. You have talked about workforce and, rightly, about the need to double the speed of production—

18
21 Oct 2025Defence Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 841)

You have talked about the need to halve the period of time it takes. Quite a lot of measures were set out in the defence nuclear enterprise Command Paper about how to improve the workforce. Do you think they are adequate? What were the good things and the bad things? What is really working?

54
21 Oct 2025Defence Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 841)

Because you cannot grow a nuclear engineer in five years. They have to grow into experienced capability over a long period of time, so you start early in scale and then you develop them through the experience—

37
21 Oct 2025Defence Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 841)

So if you do not invest in the workforce early, you are actually increasing your risk.

16
21 Oct 2025Defence Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 841)

What about growing that capability in Australia? What are we doing to build that?

14
21 Oct 2025Defence Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 841)

Obviously, it is a pretty dramatic challenge here, but in a place where there is really very little nuclear defence capability in place at all, it is going to be a huge challenge.

33
21 Oct 2025Defence Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 841)

That is very helpful. Thank you so much.

8
10 Sept 2025 Business of the House

I thank the Leader of the House for the business. On this 24th anniversary of 9/11, I know the whole House will want to join me and, I am sure, the Leader of the House in sending our best wishes to the families and the friends of the victims of those horrendous terrorist attacks. So, too, our best wishes go to those gr

mp-performancelocal-governmenteconomy-jobs
730
10 Sept 2025 Business of the House

Will the new Leader of the House give us the forthcoming business?

mp-performancelocal-governmenteconomy-jobs
12
9 Sept 2025Defence Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 841)

Okay, so it is a major geo-strategic defence move in the Indo-Pacific, but it is really about what the UK is, in part, as a defence power, in a way that has not been recognised by painting it as a purely Indo-Pacific initiative. Is that what you are saying?

49
← PreviousPage 21 of 36 · click a debate to open the transcript with this MP’s speeches highlightedNext →
Sources
SourceHansard · official report
MethodEach row is one contribution (intervention or speech). Word count from the official text.