The Westminster lensArchive · §02 Speeches · 821 contributions

Speeches by Mayhew.

Every Hansard contribution by Jerome Mayhew this parliament, most recent first. Back to the MP page for the headline figures and analysed positions.

Showing 261280 of 821 contributions · most-recent first

← PreviousPage 14 of 42Next →
DateDebate & contributionWords
20 Jan 2026Railways Bill (First sitting)

Q I do not mean to confuse you; I seek to clarify whether an appeal on judicial review principles means that someone who is unhappy with a decision cannot have that decision reconsidered—so there is no appeal on the merits. John Larkinson: Judicial review principles are things like irrationality and illegality—it is ve

transporteconomy-jobslocal-government
55
20 Jan 2026Railways Bill (First sitting)

Q That answer was about the powers you have once an appeal comes to you, but my question was on what kinds of appeal can get in front of you in the first place. Going back to the original question, am I right in saying that, under the Bill, there is no right for an appeal on the merits, and that you cannot have a secon

transporteconomy-jobslocal-government
86
20 Jan 2026Railways Bill (First sitting)

Q Mr Brown, there are very few references in the Bill to value for money driving competition. In fact, the competition remit of the ORR is specifically excluded for large sections of the operation of GBR, and the Secretary of State has no ability to grant provision of service contracts to private companies—it has to be

transporteconomy-jobslocal-government
93
20 Jan 2026Railways Bill (First sitting)

Q I turn now to the Bill, rather than the broader situation. There are huge powers in the Bill for the Secretary of State or the Department for Transport, in relation to setting out the long-term strategy, intervening in fares and their structure, and giving guidance and direction. Those are the key areas, but there ar

transporteconomy-jobslocal-government
81
20 Jan 2026Railways Bill (First sitting)

Q I thank both the witnesses for coming. There is a lot to get through and we are short of time. I will start with Mr Williams. You have written a report on the future of railway. You proposed the creation of GBR, but to operate through private concessions as opposed to nationalisation. The Government have now taken a

transporteconomy-jobslocal-government
270
20 Jan 2026Railways Bill (Second sitting)

Q It has become very command-and-control, hasn’t it? It is top-down, but you are saying that it should be more bottom-up. Andy Burnham: Yes, I think if you end up with a very top-down railway, it is a bit like the phrase I used to hear in the Department of Health: “You can hit the target and miss the point.” Is that no

transporteconomy-jobs
594
20 Jan 2026Railways Bill (Second sitting)

Q The question I asked had absolutely nothing to do with ideology or the unification of track and train; it is a fundamental question of fairness. The Government have decided that this is the route they want to go down. I may disagree with that, but that was not my question. Having decided to go down this route, it mus

transporteconomy-jobs
488
20 Jan 2026Railways Bill (First sitting)

Yes, from Government rather than GBR being the director. Keith Williams: No, the way I see it is that, actually, there is a good segregation of functions within the system now that were not there previously. Again, if you look back to 2018, the failure of the system was in part brought because every decision went back

transporteconomy-jobslocal-government
219
20 Jan 2026Railways Bill (First sitting)

Q Thank you for coming. Broadly speaking, we are talking about governance and accountability in this session. I am going to dive straight in, Mr Larkinson. On the appeals process as envisaged by the new ORR, we can see from clause 68 that there is to be no appeal on the merits of economic considerations; it is only to

transporteconomy-jobslocal-government
314
20 Jan 2026Railways Bill (First sitting)

Q Thank you all for coming in person or, Emma, for joining online. I am going to focus on clause 18 of the Bill, which is on the general duties of Ministers, GBR and the ORR. In particular, I will jump straight to clause 18(2), which sets out the functions and how they should operate those functions. Paragraph (c) stat

transporteconomy-jobslocal-government
317
20 Jan 2026Railways Bill (Second sitting)

Q What sort of sums of money are we talking about in the control period? Rob Morris: The overall figure is normally about £40 billion, in terms of renewals and operations maintenance.

transporteconomy-jobs
32
20 Jan 2026Railways Bill (First sitting)

That would be rational. Ben Plowden: It would be perfectly rational, and I understand from media reports that that may indeed be what is happening on the west coast main line. It seems to us that you either need to broaden the number of things that GBR must take into account in terms of passenger service standards and/

transporteconomy-jobslocal-government
137
20 Jan 2026Railways Bill (First sitting)

Neither of which we have seen. Michael Roberts: Correct, and I think the Committee would want the reassurance of understanding what content covering this aspect will be in those documents, as it considers whether the Bill is appropriately written. Alex Robertson: I agree with a lot of what has been said, particularly t

transporteconomy-jobslocal-government
123
20 Jan 2026Railways Bill (First sitting)

Q The second issue I wish to draw out is the fair treatment of other fare providers. At the moment, a number of independent retailers have very good tech that facilitates passengers using the railway. In the new environment, Great British Railways will be the holder of the data—the holder of the ring—but it is also int

transporteconomy-jobslocal-government
304
20 Jan 2026Railways Bill (Second sitting)

Q And your combined evidence—again, I am putting words into your mouth, but correct me—is that the Bill as drafted not only does not solve that problem of 30% of increased costs, of the £40 billion every five years, but actually exacerbates it, because it removes what little certainty there currently is. Rob Morris: Yo

transporteconomy-jobs
74
20 Jan 2026Railways Bill (Second sitting)

Q It is a very good podcast; I listen to it a lot. Thank you very much for giving oral evidence. I now realise how you get a CBE in this country—you just have to be involved in the railways and they come along. You are certainly the third—probably the fourth—that we have had before us today. I am going to focus on a co

transporteconomy-jobs
503
20 Jan 2026Railways Bill (Second sitting)

Q You looked at it when you were with the SRA, back in the day, and you rejected it, presumably. What were the reasons for your rejection of that approach? Richard Bowker: The ’93 Act was not set up that way; it was set up so that the Strategic Rail Authority was responsible for setting an overall strategic plan for th

transporteconomy-jobs
137
20 Jan 2026Railways Bill (First sitting)

Q What if the Government refuse to carve it off, as has been done in other international examples? The Bill does not require a level playing field. Would you support improving the Bill by expressly stating that GBR must provide a level playing field on data and access for all retailers? Ben Plowden: We would. In partic

transporteconomy-jobslocal-government
87
20 Jan 2026Railways Bill (First sitting)

Does anyone else on the panel disagree with that assertion? Michael Roberts indicated dissent.

transporteconomy-jobslocal-government
14
20 Jan 2026Railways Bill (Second sitting)

Q So 30% of £40 billion is an increased cost as a result of this process. Rob Morris: Subjectively, yes. I think there will be more accurate figures around that, but it is an inefficient process.

transporteconomy-jobs
36
← PreviousPage 14 of 42 · click a debate to open the transcript with this MP’s speeches highlightedNext →
Sources
SourceHansard · official report
MethodEach row is one contribution (intervention or speech). Word count from the official text.