The Westminster lensArchive · §02 Speeches · 821 contributions

Speeches by Mayhew.

Every Hansard contribution by Jerome Mayhew this parliament, most recent first. Back to the MP page for the headline figures and analysed positions.

Showing 241260 of 821 contributions · most-recent first

← PreviousPage 13 of 42Next →
DateDebate & contributionWords
22 Jan 2026Railways Bill (Third sitting)

I do. I apologise to the Committee; I erroneously thought that we were dealing with amendment 257 in isolation. There is huge interest in this Bill, which will directly affect lots of people. It will affect the employees, of course, as well as Network Rail, the train operating companies, the remaining franchisees and t

transporteconomy-jobs
236
22 Jan 2026Railways Bill (Third sitting)

That demonstrates that the current system is working to hold Trainline to account, and that where there are abuses—if what the hon. Gentleman outlined amounted to abuses—effective systems are in position and they have been corrected. The hon. Gentleman’s intervention did not speak to the overriding point: what do the G

transporteconomy-jobs
663
22 Jan 2026Railways Bill (Third sitting)

It is very nice to have you in the Chair, Mrs Hobhouse. I think this a conversation among Labour Members, and I do not want to get in the way of a private dispute. I might just sit down and listen to what the Minister has to say.

transporteconomy-jobs
48
22 Jan 2026Railways Bill (Fourth sitting)

That is just as well, because I am going to leave those to the Liberal Democrat spokesman, but I will be happy to support new clause 15 should he be minded to press it to a vote.

transportenvironmenteconomy-jobs
37
22 Jan 2026Railways Bill (Third sitting)

I have great respect for the Minister and I hear with interest what he said, but I am not convinced that the sector will receive sufficient reassurance from that, so I intend to push the amendment to a vote. Perhaps others, subsequently, as well, but we will deal with those later. Question put, That the amendment be ma

transporteconomy-jobs
58
22 Jan 2026Railways Bill (Fourth sitting)

I am grateful to the Minister for setting out his defence of the Bill. The problem with his argument is that, because the Government have gone off half-cocked, the Committee is not in a position to assess whether he is right or wrong on the nature of the KPIs, or even on where they should be, because we have not been f

transportenvironmenteconomy-jobs
103
22 Jan 2026Railways Bill (Fourth sitting)

It is a pleasure to see you in your place, Sir Alec. Amendment 241, in my name, is important, as so many of these amendments are. We heard in both oral and written evidence that lots of people are concerned about the need for this amendment, which addresses the concerns of many in the non-Great British Railways sector,

transportenvironmenteconomy-jobs
1,099
22 Jan 2026Railways Bill (Fourth sitting)

I beg to move amendment 241, in clause 3, page 2, line 17, after “including,” insert “acting in a fair and non-discriminatory manner”. This amendment would require equal treatment between GBR and non-GBR services.

transportenvironmenteconomy-jobs
34
22 Jan 2026Railways Bill (Fourth sitting)

To clarify, that figure is about not just the private sector, but rail services in Scotland and Wales not being part of GBR. It is the non-GBR parts of the greater rail world: about 60% are nothing to do with GBR.

transportenvironmenteconomy-jobs
41
22 Jan 2026Railways Bill (Fourth sitting)

My hon. Friend makes a very interesting point. One of the stand-out moments from Tuesday’s oral evidence was that given by the mayors, Andy Burnham and Tracy Brabin. What it highlighted, apart from their articulate defence of their regions’ interests, was how different things will be, under the current proposals, in ma

transportenvironmenteconomy-jobs
433
22 Jan 2026Railways Bill (Fourth sitting)

It is always a pleasure to hear the Minister explain the Government’s positions, but I remain unconvinced in relation to amendment 241, which I believe is the only one that can be put to a Division at this stage. I would like to press it to a vote. Question put, That the amendment be made.

transportenvironmenteconomy-jobs
55
22 Jan 2026Railways Bill (Fourth sitting)

I am very supportive of the intent behind this new clause. Where the Government have taken the political decision to put all their eggs in the nationalisation basket, it becomes even more important that we add as many clauses to the Bill as possible to force them to focus on the passenger experience. Nationalisation ha

transportenvironmenteconomy-jobs
293
22 Jan 2026Railways Bill (Fourth sitting)

Shadow Minister.

transportenvironmenteconomy-jobs
2
22 Jan 2026Railways Bill (Fourth sitting)

The hon. Gentleman makes a good point. It is right partially to defend Network Rail. It is an issue of balance and of the culture going forward. He also talked about capacity—this is not a party political point—but that is determined by not just the number of trains, but the length of trains, which makes an enormous di

transportenvironmenteconomy-jobs
117
22 Jan 2026Railways Bill (Fourth sitting)

The official Opposition, strongly support this amendment because it seeks to increase passenger traffic on the railways, in addition to the welcomed inclusion of an objective to increase freight. We agree with it so strongly because it is almost identical to our amendment 35, which I shall also speak to. Amendment 35 w

transportenvironmenteconomy-jobs
1,015
20 Jan 2026Railways Bill (First sitting)

Does anyone else on the panel disagree with that assertion? Michael Roberts indicated dissent.

transporteconomy-jobslocal-government
14
20 Jan 2026Railways Bill (Second sitting)

Q It is a very good podcast; I listen to it a lot. Thank you very much for giving oral evidence. I now realise how you get a CBE in this country—you just have to be involved in the railways and they come along. You are certainly the third—probably the fourth—that we have had before us today. I am going to focus on a co

transporteconomy-jobs
503
20 Jan 2026Railways Bill (Second sitting)

Q And your combined evidence—again, I am putting words into your mouth, but correct me—is that the Bill as drafted not only does not solve that problem of 30% of increased costs, of the £40 billion every five years, but actually exacerbates it, because it removes what little certainty there currently is. Rob Morris: Yo

transporteconomy-jobs
74
20 Jan 2026Railways Bill (First sitting)

Q What if the Government refuse to carve it off, as has been done in other international examples? The Bill does not require a level playing field. Would you support improving the Bill by expressly stating that GBR must provide a level playing field on data and access for all retailers? Ben Plowden: We would. In partic

transporteconomy-jobslocal-government
87
20 Jan 2026Railways Bill (Second sitting)

Q What sort of sums of money are we talking about in the control period? Rob Morris: The overall figure is normally about £40 billion, in terms of renewals and operations maintenance.

transporteconomy-jobs
32
← PreviousPage 13 of 42 · click a debate to open the transcript with this MP’s speeches highlightedNext →
Sources
SourceHansard · official report
MethodEach row is one contribution (intervention or speech). Word count from the official text.