The Westminster lensArchive · §02 Speeches · 821 contributions

Speeches by Mayhew.

Every Hansard contribution by Jerome Mayhew this parliament, most recent first. Back to the MP page for the headline figures and analysed positions.

Showing 201220 of 821 contributions · most-recent first

← PreviousPage 11 of 42Next →
DateDebate & contributionWords
27 Jan 2026Railways Bill (Sixth sitting)

Clause 15 requires the Secretary of State to publish a document that sets out the long-term strategy for the railway, which we welcome, after consulting with Welsh Ministers and the passenger watchdog. The Secretary of State must keep the strategy under review and publish any revisions. The clause does not provide any

transportfiscal-policy
665
27 Jan 2026Railways Bill (Sixth sitting)

GBR may plan on a five year basis, but it is not the same five years, is it?

transportfiscal-policy
18
27 Jan 2026Railways Bill (Sixth sitting)

From the Government’s perspective, yes, it would be, but we have recent experience—this is a slight tangent, but I hope the Committee will bear with me—of Governments passing key objectives to achieve long out in the distance. I am thinking of the Climate Change Act 2008 and its objective of achieving net zero by 2050.

transportfiscal-policy
546
27 Jan 2026Railways Bill (Sixth sitting)

Yes, repeatedly, which is great, because my hon. Friend is absolutely fighting for his constituency and his constituents. He has told me of a repeated trouble that communities experience when a level crossing closes very frequently and for long periods with no regard to the economic impact of that on the town in which

transportfiscal-policy
497
27 Jan 2026Railways Bill (Sixth sitting)

The Minister is a mind reader; I was just about to ask him to give way. He says he cannot agree to amendment 124 because we need flexibility in the future, but he will see that it refers to “measurable performance indicators for each statutory duty listed in Section 18”, so that flexibility would only run so far as any

transportfiscal-policy
98
27 Jan 2026Railways Bill (Sixth sitting)

I listened with interest to the explanation the Minister gave and his request that the amendment be withdrawn. I was particularly interested to hear him describe the role of the ORR as a “trusted expert adviser”. In my submission, when we have GBR as the player and referee in many of the areas it will be active in, wit

transportfiscal-policy
160
27 Jan 2026Railways Bill (Fifth sitting)

The Committee will be pleased to hear that I am not going to reheat my arguments on clause 7, but we have not yet discussed clause 8. The arguments inevitably mirror each other to a degree, because clause 8 in the main seeks to extend the provisions of clause 7 to Scottish Ministers. Clause 8 will grant Ministers in Sc

transport
822
27 Jan 2026Railways Bill (Fifth sitting)

Will the Minister give way?

transport
5
27 Jan 2026Railways Bill (Fifth sitting)

I am grateful that the Minister is being very generous. In my opening remarks, I asked him to give me some real-world examples of when injunctive relief might be required. Could he not forget to provide those?

transport
37
27 Jan 2026Railways Bill (Fifth sitting)

My hon. Friend is absolutely right. We have made that point as forcefully as we can. I trust the Minister when he says that he will take it away and do his best with his ministerial and departmental colleagues, but it is not just a matter of saying, “We kind of understand that licences already exist. Licences have been

transport
790
27 Jan 2026Railways Bill (Fifth sitting)

I am wholly unconvinced by the explanation the Minister has given. On many of the clauses and amendments I have put forward, and those put forward in the names of other Members, one can see both sides of the argument; on this one, I think the Government are entirely wrong. They are setting up a structure using another

transport
115
27 Jan 2026Railways Bill (Sixth sitting)

I agreed with the hon. Gentleman until that last sentence, because new clause 40, which I will come to in a moment, would require not the removal of subsidy but looking towards it—it is aspirational. It would set GBR’s sights on minimising its costs to the taxpayer, not through penny pinching if that would be the wrong

transportfiscal-policy
537
27 Jan 2026Railways Bill (Fifth sitting)

I am grateful to the Minister, though I remind him that we do have 14 sessions; we are not cantering to the last fence. He prays in aid National Highways. We are all constituency MPs. We all know how frustrating it is trying to deal with National Highways. I do not want to make a headline unnecessarily, but my personal

transport
97
27 Jan 2026Railways Bill (Fifth sitting)

You are kind to call me to speak again, Sir Alec; I realise that I did not speak to clause 10 earlier. Briefly, I recognise that clause 10 mirrors clause 9, which we have debated substantially, but it is important to note that Scottish Ministers are given a guidance function, whereas Welsh Ministers are not. That refle

transport
138
27 Jan 2026Railways Bill (Fifth sitting)

It is just as pleasurable to have you in the Chair today as it was last week, Sir Alec. I remind hon. Members that clause 7 gives the Secretary of State the power to issue and publish directions to Great British Railways relating to its railway activities. It also outlines how the Secretary of State must obtain consent

transport
800
27 Jan 2026Railways Bill (Sixth sitting)

Mr Western, you get what you measure. We on this side of the Committee are very keen that we measure the level of involvement for the taxpayer and that we do our best to look after the taxpayer in the design of this structure, so I intend to press all the amendments.

transportfiscal-policy
52
22 Jan 2026Railways Bill (Third sitting)

I enjoyed listening to the Minister read out the explanatory notes; we are all under no illusion as to what clause 2 stands for. The Opposition think it is eminently sensible—in fact, it lifted directly from the structure proposed by the previous Conservative Government for the draft Rail Reform Bill. Government amendm

transporteconomy-jobs
75
22 Jan 2026Railways Bill (Fourth sitting)

The Minister has set out his views on this clause clearly. We have already explored the difference of opinion about whether or not it should be the Secretary of State and GBR that collaborate with TfL. However, the direction of the clause is an eminently sensible one and we do not wish to stand in its way. Question put

transportenvironmenteconomy-jobs
82
22 Jan 2026Railways Bill (Fourth sitting)

I am grateful to the Minister for his explanation, and to the hon. Member for Bexleyheath and Crayford for giving his lived experience of the TfL area. I am partially convinced. I will not press this amendment to a Division, so I think we can move on. I beg to ask leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment, by leave, w

transportenvironmenteconomy-jobs
60
22 Jan 2026Railways Bill (Fourth sitting)

Clause 6 deals with co-operation between GBR and Transport for London. The clause seems to exist in direct juxtaposition to clause 5, and, interestingly, to the general spirit of the Bill expressed in other clauses. While many aspects of the Bill bring powers back to the Department for Transport, GBR and the Secretary

transportenvironmenteconomy-jobs
337
← PreviousPage 11 of 42 · click a debate to open the transcript with this MP’s speeches highlightedNext →
Sources
SourceHansard · official report
MethodEach row is one contribution (intervention or speech). Word count from the official text.