The Westminster lensArchive · §02 Speeches · 821 contributions

Speeches by Mayhew.

Every Hansard contribution by Jerome Mayhew this parliament, most recent first. Back to the MP page for the headline figures and analysed positions.

Showing 181200 of 821 contributions · most-recent first

← PreviousPage 10 of 42Next →
DateDebate & contributionWords
27 Jan 2026Railways Bill (Fifth sitting)

I beg to move amendment 109, in schedule 1, page 55, line 10, leave out from “may,” to “grant” and insert— “at the recommendation of the Office of the Rail and Road in relation to matters related to safety and standards and, after consultation with the Passengers’ Council,”. This amendment would require the Secretary o

transport
1,149
27 Jan 2026Railways Bill (Sixth sitting)

The Government’s defence is pretty extraordinary. What they are saying is that GBR should be free to charge unreasonable amounts—otherwise there would be no objection to the wording of the amendment, which simply seeks to put the word “reasonable” into the requirement. The Government say that even though this monopoly

transportfiscal-policy
186
27 Jan 2026Railways Bill (Sixth sitting)

So here we are: this is the eminently sensible approach to providing funding for the ORR to continue its operations as a safety regulator. Clause 14 allows the Office of Rail and Road to require GBR to pay a levy to the ORR for performing its non-safety railway functions. That provides the ORR with a legally guaranteed

transportfiscal-policy
352
27 Jan 2026Railways Bill (Sixth sitting)

Clause 15 requires the Secretary of State to publish a document that sets out the long-term strategy for the railway, which we welcome, after consulting with Welsh Ministers and the passenger watchdog. The Secretary of State must keep the strategy under review and publish any revisions. The clause does not provide any

transportfiscal-policy
665
27 Jan 2026Railways Bill (Sixth sitting)

From the Government’s perspective, yes, it would be, but we have recent experience—this is a slight tangent, but I hope the Committee will bear with me—of Governments passing key objectives to achieve long out in the distance. I am thinking of the Climate Change Act 2008 and its objective of achieving net zero by 2050.

transportfiscal-policy
546
27 Jan 2026Railways Bill (Sixth sitting)

Yes, repeatedly, which is great, because my hon. Friend is absolutely fighting for his constituency and his constituents. He has told me of a repeated trouble that communities experience when a level crossing closes very frequently and for long periods with no regard to the economic impact of that on the town in which

transportfiscal-policy
497
27 Jan 2026Railways Bill (Sixth sitting)

The Minister is a mind reader; I was just about to ask him to give way. He says he cannot agree to amendment 124 because we need flexibility in the future, but he will see that it refers to “measurable performance indicators for each statutory duty listed in Section 18”, so that flexibility would only run so far as any

transportfiscal-policy
98
27 Jan 2026Railways Bill (Sixth sitting)

As I intimated earlier, amendments 119 and 129 are probing and I will not press them to a vote. I was interested to hear the Minister’s apparent position that there is no boom and bust, that the current situation for infrastructure funding is fine and that the evidence from the industry appears not to be—

transportfiscal-policy
55
27 Jan 2026Railways Bill (Sixth sitting)

Our amendments in this group develop the theme that I spoke about in the debate on the last group. We have tabled two small probing amendments to challenge the stop-start nature of funding under the current control period. Amendment 119 would insert the following new paragraph (1A) into schedule 2: “The date specified

transportfiscal-policy
106
27 Jan 2026Railways Bill (Sixth sitting)

The Minister refers to clause 18(2)(e), which states: “They must exercise the functions… in the manner best calculated to be in the public interest”. Can the Minister not see that GBR’s assessment of what is in the public interest could very well be what it considers to be in its own interest, because it is a public bo

transportfiscal-policy
97
27 Jan 2026Railways Bill (Sixth sitting)

Clause 12 is an enabling clause. It is very short and merely refers to schedule 2, so I make no representations to change it and shall not seek to divide the Committee on it.

transportfiscal-policy
34
27 Jan 2026Railways Bill (Sixth sitting)

GBR may plan on a five year basis, but it is not the same five years, is it?

transportfiscal-policy
18
27 Jan 2026Railways Bill (Fifth sitting)

You are kind to call me to speak again, Sir Alec; I realise that I did not speak to clause 10 earlier. Briefly, I recognise that clause 10 mirrors clause 9, which we have debated substantially, but it is important to note that Scottish Ministers are given a guidance function, whereas Welsh Ministers are not. That refle

transport
138
27 Jan 2026Railways Bill (Sixth sitting)

We now turn to paragraph 4 of schedule 2, which deals with the business plan and approval by the Secretary of State. To receive public funding under paragraph 4, GBR is required to include in its business plan an explanation of how it will meet the objectives set by the Secretary of State. Amendment 124 seeks to streng

transportfiscal-policy
445
27 Jan 2026Railways Bill (Sixth sitting)

I agreed with the hon. Gentleman until that last sentence, because new clause 40, which I will come to in a moment, would require not the removal of subsidy but looking towards it—it is aspirational. It would set GBR’s sights on minimising its costs to the taxpayer, not through penny pinching if that would be the wrong

transportfiscal-policy
537
27 Jan 2026Railways Bill (Sixth sitting)

I heard what the Minister said, but it flies in the face of the evidence that the industry itself gives him and all of us about the need for certainty towards the end of a control period. All that the amendment seeks is certainty for two years at the start of a control period. How is he going to address that particular

transportfiscal-policy
63
27 Jan 2026Railways Bill (Fifth sitting)

I echo all the comments made by my right hon. and hon. Friends. I also thank the Minister for facing up to it with a point of order. It was obvious last week that a point of order was on its way. None of us on the Opposition Benches will hold him to his initial, rather quick, response—no doubt I will do something simil

transport
328
27 Jan 2026Railways Bill (Sixth sitting)

Amendments 120 to 123 aim to strengthen GBR’s value for money and wider performance duties. As drafted, paragraph 2(2) in schedule 2 only gives the Secretary of State the option of tying performance objectives to granting public funds. The performance objectives should be at the core of the granting of funds, so amendm

transportfiscal-policy
257
27 Jan 2026Railways Bill (Fifth sitting)

I beg to move amendment 12, in clause 7, page 4, line 30, after “functions” insert— “where the Office for Rail and Road, in carrying out its functions under section 69A of the Railways Act 1993 (as inserted by section 74 of this Act), has deemed Great British Railways to be in breach of its statutory functions.” This a

transport
93
27 Jan 2026Railways Bill (Fifth sitting)

It is certainly welcome, but we are still in the position in which an improvement to a line—something as small as the Haughley junction improvement, which costs roughly £15 million to £20 million—still needs ministerial sign-off from the Treasury before it can be authorised. The Government have some way to go to improv

transport
422
← PreviousPage 10 of 42 · click a debate to open the transcript with this MP’s speeches highlightedNext →
Sources
SourceHansard · official report
MethodEach row is one contribution (intervention or speech). Word count from the official text.