The Westminster lensArchive · §02 Speeches · 565 contributions

Speeches by Murray.

Every Hansard contribution by Ian Murray this parliament, most recent first. Back to the MP page for the headline figures and analysed positions.

Showing 261280 of 565 contributions · most-recent first

← PreviousPage 14 of 29Next →
DateDebate & contributionWords
25 Jun 2025Scottish Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 410)

I don’t think so. The challenge for us as a Scotland Office is to make sure that other Departments have in their spending reviews what we want in Scotland. For example—just for the benefit of the Committee—the £750 million for the supercomputer at the University of Edinburgh, which Minister McNeill launched on the day

194
25 Jun 2025Scottish Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 410)

At the election we inherited an economy that was in complete and utter chaos. Public finances were in chaos, with an industrial crisis across Scotland and the rest of the UK. We had to make some pretty tough decisions to stabilise that, by filling the £22 billion black hole, by stabilising the—

52
25 Jun 2025Scottish Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 410)

We had to raise taxes in order to be able to invest in our public services and the economy. The Budget in October put £40 billion extra into our public services because they were on their knees—whether it be the NHS, education, transport or infrastructure—and £100 billion is going into capital investment. That had to b

153
25 Jun 2025Scottish Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 410)

We are working very hard to try to get all these projects over the line as quickly as possible. The spending review was part of that process, of course, and the hydrogen allocation round was part of that process. We were over the moon that so many projects came forward and at the disproportionately high level of Scotti

78
25 Jun 2025Scottish Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 410)

No.

1
25 Jun 2025Scottish Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 410)

Scotland has punched above its weight in terms of the hydrogen sector. In the call for projects to come forward for the funding, there are 11 UK projects, eight of which have been shortlisted in Scotland. There is a £2 billion package on the table. The shortlist for the second hydrogen allocation round has been announc

200
25 Jun 2025Scottish Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 410)

Again, it is not finger in the air because this Government have made a huge commitment to hydrogen both in the spending review and in the Budget. Again, I can give that 100% reassurance that the Government are working at pace to get to a position where we can fund these projects and get hydrogen up and running as quick

68
25 Jun 2025Scottish Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 410)

Let me go back to Acorn. You can talk down the Acorn project if you wish to do so—

19
25 Jun 2025Scottish Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 410)

Well, wages are up more in the last 10 months than they have been in the last 10 years. Therefore, there is more money in people’s pockets. That is what we promised we would do at the election. The number one thing for businesses is to make sure that the public has more disposable income, and that is what we are determ

64
25 Jun 2025Scottish Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 410)

I am astonished that that is your second question and you have mentioned independence twice.

15
25 Jun 2025Scottish Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 410)

The key thing that businesses told us at the election is they want stability, they want credibility, and they want investment in the economy. That is what we have delivered. That takes money to do. I have yet to hear a proposal that suggests that we take that £25 billion out of the economy and suggests what we replace

137
25 Jun 2025Scottish Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 410)

The big question is about affordability and readiness. That is what this money is for: to get it to a stage where it can be looked at as a final investment decision. There is no doubt the Acorn project has many fantastic attributes: it has the St Fergus terminal, it has the pipelines, it has Grangemouth, it has the inf

182
25 Jun 2025Scottish Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 410)

I am the Member of Parliament for Edinburgh South and Secretary of State for Scotland.

15
25 Jun 2025Scottish Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 410)

Viking has been funded in the same way for development funding and through the same pot. It was a £350 million pot. I will check the figure for you, but they are both being given the development funding to get to final investment decision. I would not want one project to be over the other; I am just highlighting the fa

89
25 Jun 2025Scottish Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 410)

You used the word “demoted”. It has not been demoted; there has always been a track 1 and a track 2 process. Track 1 has been fully funded; it went through approvals because it has its readiness. Track 2—although it is not necessarily a track 2, and it has always been said to Acorn that it was right behind, and next in

108
25 Jun 2025Scottish Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 410)

That was a decision that was made by the previous Government. It came down to the fact that the heavy industries in the cluster around the track 1 projects were a much readier source of carbon than the Acorn project itself. Despite the fact that Acorn had the infrastructure, it did not necessarily have the level and vo

260
25 Jun 2025Scottish Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 410)

To highlight, the Glasgow chamber of commerce has recently been to Shanghai. The interim director of the Scotland Office accompanied them to try to get some big projects over the line. We are all looking for measurables, but some things need a nudge from Government to get them over the line. Hopefully, we will get some

68
25 Jun 2025Scottish Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 410)

I do not recognise that because this is comparing estimates rather than actuals. If we look at the actuals, there is £4.9 billion—£1.5 billion in the previous financial part year and £3.4 billion extra in this financial year. There is £9.1 billion extra across the spending review period, which is the next three years.

115
25 Jun 2025Scottish Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 410)

I do not want to spend any time at this Committee talking about global instability because everyone knows that is the case. Maybe I could just use that as the first sentence to segue into the fact that from a Scotland Office perspective, all that is incredibly important. We have seen the increase in defence spending an

192
25 Jun 2025Scottish Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 410)

There is a drive for efficiencies in the sense of what the Government have been trying to do through the spending reviews, and to shift the day-to-day spending from administration of Government Departments to frontline priorities in terms of programme budgets. That has not been different in the Scotland Office. Brand S

266
← PreviousPage 14 of 29 · click a debate to open the transcript with this MP’s speeches highlightedNext →
Sources
SourceHansard · official report
MethodEach row is one contribution (intervention or speech). Word count from the official text.