The Westminster lensArchive · §02 Speeches · 536 contributions

Speeches by Murray.

Every Hansard contribution by Ian Murray this parliament, most recent first. Back to the MP page for the headline figures and analysed positions.

Showing 181200 of 536 contributions · most-recent first

← PreviousPage 10 of 27Next →
DateDebate & contributionWords
10 Sept 2025Life Sciences Investment

I have just been working with the Department of Health and Social Care to try to bring that forward. I do not know the exact answer to the right hon. Lady’s question. If I knew the answer, I would give it. I do not, so I will write to her.

economy-jobstechnologyhealth
50
10 Sept 2025Life Sciences Investment

I am tempted to say no, just to see what reaction that gets! But of course I will meet any hon. or right hon. Member across the House to discuss the life sciences sector. Whether we are talking about the north, south, east or west, including in my own constituency, the life sciences play a key role and will continue to

economy-jobstechnologyhealth
63
10 Sept 2025Life Sciences Investment

I congratulate the hon. Gentleman’s wife on what she does in the sector—she is the only one in the family with a real job. That shows the depth and breadth of the sector across the country; everyone will know someone who works in it. We have £86 billion from the spending review going into research and development, and

economy-jobstechnologyhealth
117
10 Sept 2025Life Sciences Investment

I would say to life sciences students in the fledgling part of their career that it is a career they should be in for the long term. Life sciences is the future, which is why it is one of the eight key sectors in our industrial strategy. The news the Government have had today on MSD’s commercial decision is incredibly

economy-jobstechnologyhealth
142
10 Sept 2025Life Sciences Investment

Our workforce are the very best in the world, and our world-class institutions are made world class because of that world-class workforce. This is the best place in the world to invest at the moment. We are in discussions with the US in respect of the pharmaceutical industry and the tariffs in the EU-US economic deal.

economy-jobstechnologyhealth
120
10 Sept 2025Life Sciences Investment

I am very happy to do so. I think that is my third invite already this morning. The question and the invite to Newcastle-under-Lyme demonstrate the thriving life sciences sector all across the country. I can give my hon. Friend an assurance that we intend to back the life sciences sector. Although the decision from MSD

economy-jobstechnologyhealth
83
10 Sept 2025Life Sciences Investment

I say to the right hon. Gentleman, for whom I have the utmost respect, that in the first part of his question he quite rightly promotes the wonderful work that is going on in his constituency at the Discovery Park and then says that everything is doom and gloom. That is not the case. This Government are investing in re

economy-jobstechnologyhealth
125
10 Sept 2025Life Sciences Investment

I am grateful to the hon. Gentleman for raising those points. It is important to lay out to the public and to the House that MSD will continue to employ 1,600 people and be a key part of the life sciences sector. There are many companies that are investing in this country—Moderna, BioNTech, Isomorphic Labs—and in my ow

economy-jobstechnologyhealth
197
10 Sept 2025Life Sciences Investment

Very simply, the life sciences sector plan has been set out to give the industry certainty over the longer term that this Government are serious about the investment that both we and the industry will make in the sector, with £2.5 billion a year from this Government and, at £86 billion, the largest settlement for R&amp

economy-jobstechnologyhealth
92
10 Sept 2025Life Sciences Investment

Thank you for your advice, Mr Speaker. I am on my last sentence. We will continue to explore opportunities to partner with MSD further and build on our long-standing relationship.

economy-jobstechnologyhealth
30
10 Sept 2025Life Sciences Investment

At this stage, I am not aware that there will be any downside to the entirety of the ecosystem that revolves around the King’s Cross area of London. This decision has obviously come very late to the Government, and we will work with MSD on the future. However, as we have heard from my hon. Friend the Member for Gravesh

economy-jobstechnologyhealth
90
10 Sept 2025Life Sciences Investment

I am grateful to the shadow Secretary of State for bringing the urgent question to the Chamber, as this is an incredibly important issue. Let me answer some of the questions—I think there were some questions in there. The shadow Secretary of State asked what message America has given to the Government, but the message

economy-jobstechnologyhealth
249
10 Sept 2025Life Sciences Investment

I start by welcoming the hon. Member to her new role. I wanted to do that yesterday, but time ran away from us during questions. I am answering this question on behalf of the Secretary of State. As a significant life sciences company that employs more than 1,600 people and plays a leading role in delivering new treatme

economy-jobstechnologyhealth
707
10 Sept 2025Life Sciences Investment

I pay tribute to my hon. Friend for his work with the university in his constituency in a whole number of areas. All who represent university towns— I do as well—know that there is significant investment going into research and development and the life sciences, because that is the future for this country. This country

economy-jobstechnologyhealth
131
10 Sept 2025Life Sciences Investment

I am grateful to my hon. Friend and would be happy to take him up on that meeting to hear about his experience directly. He raises the big issue around the legacy left by the previous Government after 15 years of underinvestment in medical pricing. The Health Secretary made a £1 billion offer to the pharmaceutical indu

economy-jobstechnologyhealth
96
10 Sept 2025Life Sciences Investment

I thank the Chair of the Select Committee for that constructive approach, and I look forward to the session on Tuesday to examine this really important issue. She mentioned the life sciences sector plan, which is really important. It comes with significant investment in research and development, improving clinical tria

economy-jobstechnologyhealth
174
8 Jul 2025Spending Review 2025: Scottish Public Services

I absolutely join my hon. Friend in that call, and I pay tribute to his tenacious campaigning to see East Calder’s new medical centre delivered. I am 10,000 GP places short in my own constituency, and the SNP needs to take that seriously. The spending review generated £5.8 billion in health-related Barnett consequentia

fiscal-policyhealthlocal-government
80
8 Jul 2025Spending Review 2025: Scottish Public Services

My hon. Friend quite rightly speaks out against the cuts to Cumbernauld fire station, which sadly is just one example of the SNP’s dangerous mismanagement of Scotland’s fire services, as the Fire Brigades Union in Scotland told me just last month. There are 9.1 billion reasons why the SNP Government should choose to in

fiscal-policyhealthlocal-government
95
8 Jul 2025Spending Review 2025: Scottish Public Services

I would extend that and say that the whole of Scotland voted against independence in 2014. It seems to me that the SNP Government’s strategy is to starve all Scotland’s public services of the vital funding that they require.

fiscal-policyhealthlocal-government
39
8 Jul 2025Spending Review 2025: Scottish Public Services

I have had a minimum of 14 billion conversations with the Treasury with regard to funding in Scotland. This is the largest settlement ever in the history of the Scottish Parliament. This Government’s decisions in the October Budget and the spending review have given us the highest growth in the G7, the highest business

fiscal-policyhealthlocal-government
88
← PreviousPage 10 of 27 · click a debate to open the transcript with this MP’s speeches highlightedNext →
Sources
SourceHansard · official report
MethodEach row is one contribution (intervention or speech). Word count from the official text.