The Westminster lensArchive · Written questions · 191 tabled · 186 answered

Written questions by Smith.

Every parliamentary written question tabled by Iain Duncan Smith this session, with the full answer and department. Back to the MP page.

Department:All (191)Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office (93)Department for Culture, Media and Sport (17)Home Office (15)Department of Health and Social Care (15)Treasury (12)Ministry of Justice (7)Ministry of Defence (6)Department for Business and Trade (6)Department for Transport (5)Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (4)Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (3)Department for Work and Pensions (2)

Showing 12 of 2 · Department for Work and Pensions

30 Oct 2024·Department for Work and Pensions·Answered
Asked

With reference to the Health and Safety Executive's (HSE) report entitled Agency Opinion on the classification and labelling of lithium carbonate [1] lithium chloride [2] and lithium hydroxide [3], published in August 2013, whether the HSE plans to initiate the Article 37A process; and what discussions she has had with the HSE on that issue.

Reply

The Health and Safety Executive (HSE) is considering whether to initiate the Article 37A process under the GB Classification, Labelling and Packaging Regulation (GB CLP) following publication of the Agency Opinion on the classification and labelling of lithium carbonate [1] lithium chloride [2] and lithium hydroxide [3] in August 2023. Under Article 37A, HSE, as the GB CLP Agency, may submit a proposal for a new or revised GB mandatory classification and labelling requirement when there is evidence of new scientific data or information that may lead to a new or revised mandatory classification and labelling for a priority hazard class, such as carcinogenicity, mutagenicity or reproductive toxicity. There is no statutory time limit on HSE to prepare and submit a proposal. HSE regulatory and scientific specialists are investigating the evidence and new scientific data made available and, if necessary, seeking any additional information or consulting other departments or agencies. HSE is continuing to engage with stakeholders during this process. No discussions have been held on this issue between the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions and HSE.

30 Oct 2024·Department for Work and Pensions·Answered
Asked

What assessment she has made of the potential merits of applying a weight of evidence approach when making decisions on the mandatory (a) classification and (b) labelling of chemicals.

Reply

The Health and Safety Executive (HSE) leads across government on the classification and labelling of chemicals and acts as the Agency for the assimilated Regulation (EC) No. 1272/2008 on classification, labelling and packaging of substances and mixtures as amended in Great Britain (or the GB CLP Regulation). HSE is responsible for the GB mandatory classification and labelling system (GB MCL) and its administrative procedures in accordance with a timetable set out in UK law. The weight and strength of all the available scientific information relating to the hazardous properties of a chemical are used when making recommendations for mandatory classification and labelling of chemicals. The technical assessments and reports that underpin these recommendations follow the criteria in the GB CLP Regulation. Ministers have made no assessment of the potential merits of applying a wider weight of evidence approach when making decisions on the mandatory (a) classification and (b) labelling of chemicals.

Sources
SourceUK Parliament Members API
MethodQuestion and answer text as published. Question preamble (“To ask the…”) trimmed for readability; answers shown in full.