The Westminster lensArchive · §02 Speeches · 989 contributions

Speeches by Benn.

Every Hansard contribution by Hilary Benn this parliament, most recent first. Back to the MP page for the headline figures and analysed positions.

Showing 321340 of 989 contributions · most-recent first

← PreviousPage 17 of 50Next →
DateDebate & contributionWords
3 Nov 2025“Soldier F” Trial Verdict

I gently say to the hon. Gentleman that I do not accept the characterisation he used at the end of his question. This is not a politically correct process; this is about trying to find a way forward for those families. The honest answer to the fair point that he raises is that each family deals with the loss of their l

defencecrimesocial-care
225
3 Nov 2025“Soldier F” Trial Verdict

I am sure that my right hon. and hon. Friends who are Ministers in the Ministry of Defence will have heard what my hon. Friend has said. The protections in the legislation that has been brought before the House are the result of extensive discussions with the Secretary of State for Defence, the armed forces Ministers,

defencecrimesocial-care
59
3 Nov 2025“Soldier F” Trial Verdict

The hon. Gentleman will be aware of the protections that we have put into legislation following the discussions that we have had with veterans, which I referred to earlier. I join him in again paying tribute to the extraordinarily brave service of all those who served during the time of Operation Banner in trying to pr

defencecrimesocial-care
126
3 Nov 2025“Soldier F” Trial Verdict

It would indeed be possible for them to refer the case to the commission.

defencecrimesocial-care
14
3 Nov 2025“Soldier F” Trial Verdict

The letters of comfort—or the on-the-run letters, however one wishes to describe them—had their origin in the time after the Good Friday agreement, as the hon. Gentleman will be well aware, but, as I explained a moment ago in answer to the right hon. Member for Chingford and Woodford Green (Sir Iain Duncan Smith), they

defencecrimesocial-care
96
3 Nov 2025“Soldier F” Trial Verdict

It is a fundamental principle of our legal system that we accept the verdicts of the courts, even if we may not agree with them. The hon. and learned Gentleman is a distinguished lawyer, and he expresses his views regarding the basis of that prosecution. The only point that I am making is that that decision is made by

defencecrimesocial-care
66
3 Nov 2025“Soldier F” Trial Verdict

I say to the hon. Member that the Saville inquiry report made for very sobering and distressing reading for all of us. Like many Members present, I was in the House to hear the former Prime Minister, Lord Cameron, make that apology to the families—something for which they had campaigned for years and years when justice

defencecrimesocial-care
131
3 Nov 2025“Soldier F” Trial Verdict

The hon. Member raises an important point. It is, however, very important to distinguish, as I know she will, between potential criminal prosecutions, which are the result of decisions of independent prosecutors, and civil cases. One of the other things that the courts found was that the ban on civil cases was incompat

defencecrimesocial-care
111
3 Nov 2025“Soldier F” Trial Verdict

The protections were put in place for veterans after consulting veterans, and they are not unimportant: the ability to stay at home and give evidence; the protection from repeated investigations; and the right to seek immunity in a hearing of the commission—people already have the right to seek that in a coroner’s cour

defencecrimesocial-care
130
3 Nov 2025“Soldier F” Trial Verdict

I would cite to the right hon. Gentleman the case of Mr John Downey, to whom I have referred in the House before. He received one of those letters, and as a result his trial for the Hyde Park bombings was halted by the judge, but the public record will show that Mr Downey is currently awaiting trial for two murders com

defencecrimesocial-care
84
3 Nov 2025“Soldier F” Trial Verdict

The Irish Government do not have a veto. I stood next to the Tánaiste, Simon Harris, and I made commitments on behalf of the British Government and he made commitments on behalf of the Irish Government. All of us in the House who wish families to get the answers for which they have been searching for so long should wel

defencecrimesocial-care
143
3 Nov 2025“Soldier F” Trial Verdict

I will do so when we have been able to inform the families in those cases. I hope that the hon. Gentleman would accept that it is only right and proper that we inform the families first, and then I will make a list available. On the reason for the Loughgall inquest, he will be aware that the former Attorney General sai

defencecrimesocial-care
90
3 Nov 2025“Soldier F” Trial Verdict

The legacy Act offered a false promise of immunity. It was found to be incompatible with our obligations, and it had no support in Northern Ireland. At some point, Opposition Members must recognise that it had no support there. How can Northern Ireland move forward if the basis of the last Government’s legislation lack

defencecrimesocial-care
105
3 Nov 2025“Soldier F” Trial Verdict

Further to that point of order, Mr Speaker. What I said was absolutely accurate, as the right hon. Gentleman well knows. On the circumstances of the trial of Mr Downey in relation to the Hyde Park bombing, the reason why the judge called that to a halt was set out. But subsequent statements made it quite clear that tho

defencecrimesocial-care
77
3 Nov 2025“Soldier F” Trial Verdict

I apologise if I have got this wrong, but I do not remember using the word “equivalence”. What I said was that independent prosecutors would make decisions on the basis of the evidence that they had before them. The current legacy commission is able to refer cases for potential prosecution, and the new legacy commissio

defencecrimesocial-care
142
22 Oct 2025Northern Ireland Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 586)

That is a really important question. The Government are allocating £250 million to the work of the commission, but a bit of that will apply to part 4 of the existing Legacy Act. Let me take this opportunity to make it clear: part 4 of the 2023 Act remains. People look at the Bill and say, “What’s happened to part 4?” I

443
22 Oct 2025Northern Ireland Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 586)

That is reassuring.

3
22 Oct 2025Northern Ireland Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 586)

That is a very good question. I would have thought that that would be welcomed—that somebody would not be capable of being appointed where others may perceive that it seems like a conflict of interest. We will have to work out in the appointment process exactly how that provision is applied. It is something for the pan

74
22 Oct 2025Northern Ireland Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 586)

In terms of the commissioner roles and the two co-directors of investigation, it will be a new start. I will review the job descriptions. There will be an invitation for applications. Those who are currently serving are of course perfectly free, as I think I said to you, to apply if they wish to do so. With the taking

441
22 Oct 2025Northern Ireland Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 586)

Yes, we can. Simon Harris himself has said that the MoU is in place, and they have committed to passing legislation to enable witnesses to come and give evidence to Omagh in time for the next session, which I understand starts in March. So that is a commitment that they have given, and I am sure that, in line with all

97
← PreviousPage 17 of 50 · click a debate to open the transcript with this MP’s speeches highlightedNext →
Sources
SourceHansard · official report
MethodEach row is one contribution (intervention or speech). Word count from the official text.