The Westminster lensArchive · §02 Speeches · 186 contributions

Speeches by Whately.

Every Hansard contribution by Helen Whately this parliament, most recent first. Back to the MP page for the headline figures and analysed positions.

Showing 2140 of 186 contributions · most-recent first

← PreviousPage 2 of 10Next →
DateDebate & contributionWords
27 Apr 2026Topical Questions

Let us put some facts on the table, because it is time for the Government to confront the hard choices. We are spending less than 2.5% of GDP on defence, but 5.3% of GDP on welfare. Six million people of working age are living on benefits. Under the Secretary of State’s Government, over a million more people have gone

labour-marketsocial-careeconomy-jobs
129
27 Apr 2026 Pension Schemes Bill

First, may I thank the hon. Gentleman for opening this evening’s debate, and for setting out the latest Government amendments, in place of the Pensions Minister? These ping-pong sessions with the hon. Member for Swansea West (Torsten Bell) have become a regular in my diary, and I will miss him this evening. When this B

economy-jobsfiscal-policy
1,382
27 Apr 2026 Pension Schemes Bill

The hon. Gentleman is quoting selectively from a letter that I have written to the industry. We had this exact debate with the Pensions Minister last week. There is an acknowledged and debated collective action problem; on that, there is a level of consensus, but there is no consensus that mandation is the right answer

economy-jobsfiscal-policy
121
22 Apr 2026Pension Schemes Bill

I do appreciate the Minister’s attempt to offer an olive branch on mandation—several olive branches, in fact. Last week an amendment was tabled to constrain his originally unlimited and undefined mandation power that would have meant he could direct up to 100% of default pension fund savings to be invested in assets of

fiscal-policyeconomy-jobslabour-market
101
22 Apr 2026Pension Schemes Bill

The Minister may be planning to say in his wrap-up that the Government already intervene and that there are all manner of regulations shaping trustee behaviour, and of course there are, but there is a fundamental difference: regulation protects the process; mandation dictates the outcomes. That is the line that this Bi

fiscal-policyeconomy-jobslabour-market
70
22 Apr 2026Pension Schemes Bill

Today we have also heard the Minister reach for one last defence—and strangely late in the day. He claimed that mandation was in the Labour party manifesto. It was not. There is no mention of mandation, no reference to a reserve power, no suggestion of asset-allocation powers of this kind. The Labour manifesto did talk

fiscal-policyeconomy-jobslabour-market
102
22 Apr 2026Pension Schemes Bill

The truth is that parts of the solution to this problem are in the Bill. The pensions dashboard will give savers visibility and, with it, agency. The value for money framework will help employers choose schemes that they can justify to their employees on the basis of returns, not just fees. Those are ways to tackle the

fiscal-policyeconomy-jobslabour-market
81
22 Apr 2026Pension Schemes Bill

That leads us to the Minister’s central claim that mandation is necessary to solve a collective action problem—that while the sector recognises the case for higher return investments, no individual scheme is willing to move first. Now, that is a serious argument, but mandation is the wrong conclusion. He says that indu

fiscal-policyeconomy-jobslabour-market
128
22 Apr 2026Pension Schemes Bill

Secondly, the Minister has said that this is merely a reserve power—and one that the Government have no intention of using. But a reserve power does not sit harmlessly on the shelf. It shapes behaviour, and I think, in truth, the Minister accepts that. He has said as much to me before—that the power will achieve its en

fiscal-policyeconomy-jobslabour-market
91
22 Apr 2026Pension Schemes Bill

This week we have seen a flurry of concessions. There have been revisions to the sunset clause. First, the date when the mandation power lapses, if it has not been used, is being brought forward from 2035 to 2032. Secondly, the entire regime will be repealed at the end of 2035. So, as drafted, the mandation threat will

fiscal-policyeconomy-jobslabour-market
98
22 Apr 2026Pension Schemes Bill

Unfortunately, that is where our agreement ends, and I suspect the Minister knows that, so let us turn directly to the elephant in the room: mandation. The Minister has advanced a number of arguments in its defence, and I will address them in turn. First, he said that this is a natural extension of the Mansion House ag

fiscal-policyeconomy-jobslabour-market
80
22 Apr 2026Pension Schemes Bill

As I think the right hon. Gentleman will have heard in my speech, there is widespread agreement that we want to see more investment by pension funds in the UK; the debate is about whether mandation is the way to achieve that. Actually the Minister’s main argument for the mandation powers is not about investment in the

fiscal-policyeconomy-jobslabour-market
108
22 Apr 2026Pension Schemes Bill

The review amendment is also welcome. It introduces a post-legislative reporting requirement on scale, which will allow this House to hold the Government to account for the real-world impact of these reforms.

fiscal-policyeconomy-jobslabour-market
32
22 Apr 2026Pension Schemes Bill

Size alone does not equal success. Take football clubs as an example: a larger club may have greater resources, a bigger stadium, more expensive players and larger crowds, but none of that guarantees results on the pitch. I am told that one need look no further than Tottenham Hotspur to see that. We welcome the Governm

fiscal-policyeconomy-jobslabour-market
99
22 Apr 2026Pension Schemes Bill

This is an extraordinary hill for the Minister to choose to die on. Mandation was never put to voters, it never had the backing of industry, and it should not be forced through Parliament now. I urge the Minister to think again.

fiscal-policyeconomy-jobslabour-market
42
22 Apr 2026Pension Schemes Bill

While pursuing the objective of scale, the Government must avoid entrenching advantage at the expense of performance. That would not serve the interests of members. It is on that basis that we tabled our amendments in the other place. The intention behind the amendments—indeed, the intention of the other place—was to p

fiscal-policyeconomy-jobslabour-market
90
22 Apr 2026Pension Schemes Bill

Now to the question of scale, the Bill assumes that if schemes offer a strong proposition and good member outcomes, there is nothing to stop them growing. We disagree; it is not that simple. For instance, it is exceptionally difficult to win new business in today’s market without already being an incumbent or large ins

fiscal-policyeconomy-jobslabour-market
69
22 Apr 2026Pension Schemes Bill

I say to the Minister yet again that pension pots belong to the people who have worked, earned and saved. It is their money, not the Government’s. Ministers in Whitehall should not have the power to dictate what people’s pension savings are invested in. As Ronald Reagan once put it, the nine most terrifying words in th

fiscal-policyeconomy-jobslabour-market
60
22 Apr 2026Pension Schemes Bill

On a point of order, Madam Deputy Speaker. The last Division we voted on was on a motion proposed by the Government that grouped a series of amendments with which we agreed, alongside amendments on mandation, with which we had strong disagreements. What steps can be taken to bring about a separate Division on the manda

fiscal-policyeconomy-jobslabour-market
61
22 Apr 2026Pension Schemes Bill

“I’m from the Government, and I’m here to help.”

fiscal-policyeconomy-jobslabour-market
9
← PreviousPage 2 of 10 · click a debate to open the transcript with this MP’s speeches highlightedNext →
Sources
SourceHansard · official report
MethodEach row is one contribution (intervention or speech). Word count from the official text.