The Westminster lensArchive · §02 Speeches · 942 contributions

Speeches by Smith.

Every Hansard contribution by Greg Smith this parliament, most recent first. Back to the MP page for the headline figures and analysed positions.

Showing 801820 of 942 contributions · most-recent first

← PreviousPage 41 of 48Next →
DateDebate & contributionWords
3 Dec 2024Employment Rights Bill (Fifth sitting)

I am clear that it should be 500 or fewer. I will not pretend to guess how some of the misdrafting may have occurred; it happens to all parties when they are in government and in opposition. I can remember a couple of errors in Bill Committees when I was sat on the Back Benches on the opposite side from the then Opposi

labour-marketeconomy-jobs
468
3 Dec 2024Employment Rights Bill (Fifth sitting)

I am grateful to the hon. Gentleman. I will not seek to mislead the Committee by saying that I am across the Presidents Club case, but I am aware of the Manning case. Undoubtedly there are holes in the law, because harassment does take place in workplaces and outside workplaces up and down the land. Conservative Member

labour-marketeconomy-jobs
199
3 Dec 2024Employment Rights Bill (Fifth sitting)

I am grateful to the hon. Lady, who makes an accurate and fair point. I repeat that harassment of any form, sexual or whatever, is deeply and totally unacceptable and wrong, and must be stamped out. The point that the Opposition are probing in amendment 139 is the proportionality of the impact on businesses—particularl

labour-marketeconomy-jobs
113
3 Dec 2024Employment Rights Bill (Fifth sitting)

I did not say that every business is offering flexible working. I said that, having visited businesses in my constituency, I am yet to find a problem around any business’s offering flexible working, or any employee or constituent with a complaint about an inability to get flexible working—quite the opposite, in fact. I

labour-marketeconomy-jobs
266
3 Dec 2024Employment Rights Bill (Fifth sitting)

I understand the point the hon. Gentleman is trying to make, but the Opposition’s concern is that the burdens that the Bill’s provisions—including this one—place on many businesses will actually result in fewer jobs in the overall labour market in the United Kingdom. I cannot for one second accept that anybody in this

labour-marketeconomy-jobs
142
3 Dec 2024Employment Rights Bill (Fifth sitting)

I am almost grateful for the Minister’s intervention. He was very perceptive to note the minor clerical error in the amendment that was previously submitted. That has now been corrected. Of course, the Conservative party stands with all business, but particularly with small and medium-sized enterprises, which, I can cl

labour-marketeconomy-jobs
533
3 Dec 2024Employment Rights Bill (Fifth sitting)

I know where the Minister is going.

labour-marketeconomy-jobs
7
3 Dec 2024Employment Rights Bill (Fifth sitting)

It is a pleasure to serve under your chairmanship, Ms Vaz, on this bright and breezy December morning. It will be the new year by the time we finish our consideration of the Bill—let us see whether we are all as fresh after Christmas as we are today. I shall briefly talk through the Opposition’s rationale for each of t

labour-marketeconomy-jobs
114
3 Dec 2024Employment Rights Bill (Fifth sitting)

I beg to move amendment 137, in clause 1, page 2, line 6, at end insert— “27ABA Reference to an employer (1) For the purposes of Chapters 2 to 4 of this Part, references to an ‘employer’ do not apply to an employer defined as a small and medium sized enterprise under subsection (2). (2) For the purposes of this section

labour-marketeconomy-jobs
94
3 Dec 2024Employment Rights Bill (Fifth sitting)

Of course we will withdraw the amendment, but the critical question is why the Minister has referred to 12 weeks, but it is not in the legislation. As he considers tabling amendments of his own in Committee or on Report, I urge him to lock that in, so that certainty for business is on the face of the Bill, rather than

labour-marketeconomy-jobs
65
3 Dec 2024Employment Rights Bill (Fifth sitting)

Our own legislation last year cited 12 weeks. There is clearly a lot in the Bill that we oppose because we just do not think it works in the interests of British business or workers, but 12 weeks would at least give us some certainty that would be consistent with the previous Government. I beg to ask leave to withdraw

labour-marketeconomy-jobs
75
2 Dec 2024Bangladesh: Attacks on Hindu Community

A number of members of the Hindu community in Mid Buckinghamshire have contacted me to say that they are deeply concerned about the situation in Bangladesh, and I urge the Minister to take every diplomatic step possible to protect Hindus in that country. Does she believe that Bangladesh’s constitution, which guarantees

culture-communitydefenceother
78
2 Dec 2024Migration and Border Security

The Home Secretary ended her statement by saying that she wanted “serious international partnerships”, but when pressed on that by the shadow Home Secretary, she seemed reluctant to say whether she would explore removal or processing agreements with third countries, as advocated by the President of the European Commiss

immigrationcrimeeconomy-jobs
63
28 Nov 2024Employment Rights Bill (Fourth sitting)

Q You mentioned the 20% unionisation rate. Do you have a target that you want to see? Andy Prendergast: They key thing for us is that everyone who ultimately wants to join a trade union has the option to do so. It is important that people are aware of their rights, aware that they can join trade unions, and aware that

labour-marketeconomy-jobs
122
28 Nov 2024Employment Rights Bill (Third sitting)

Q Good afternoon. May I come back to the question I put to the previous panel about the Regulatory Policy Committee’s verdict on the impact assessments for the Bill? I am confident—unless you shout me down instantly—that the Resolution Foundation will have looked at that and have done some research around it. Do you sh

labour-marketeconomy-jobs
98
28 Nov 2024Employment Rights Bill (Fourth sitting)

Q I hope my last point might be more consensual as we move forward. I was very sympathetic to one of the sides of this coin before the Committee started, and the evidence today has given me food for thought on the other one. The first part is bereavement leave in the event of pregnancy loss, which is a position I have

labour-marketeconomy-jobs
195
28 Nov 2024Employment Rights Bill (Fourth sitting)

Q I have two more points, if I may. First, clearly, some of the most striking evidence we heard that did not agree with much of the Bill was from Luke Johnson and Michael Lorimer earlier. Do you feel that the Government have engaged those who run businesses and employ people in the private sector, as opposed to represe

labour-marketeconomy-jobs
185
28 Nov 2024Employment Rights Bill (Fourth sitting)

Q Thank you for that answer; we will explore that more in coming weeks. I accept the political narrative of doing something in 100 days. That is well-established for Governments around the world, and Conservative Governments in the past may well have been guilty of it too. However, this is a big, reforming piece of leg

labour-marketeconomy-jobs
298
28 Nov 2024Employment Rights Bill (Fourth sitting)

Q I am slightly bemused by having a member of the Committee also answering questions. Many of the things that I and my colleagues from the official Opposition will be asking you will come in the line-by-line sessions in the coming weeks, but may I briefly ask you about the Regulatory Policy Committee? I fully appreciat

labour-marketeconomy-jobs
682
28 Nov 2024Employment Rights Bill (Fourth sitting)

That is very helpful. Thank you.

labour-marketeconomy-jobs
6
← PreviousPage 41 of 48 · click a debate to open the transcript with this MP’s speeches highlightedNext →
Sources
SourceHansard · official report
MethodEach row is one contribution (intervention or speech). Word count from the official text.