The Westminster lensArchive · §02 Speeches · 942 contributions

Speeches by Smith.

Every Hansard contribution by Greg Smith this parliament, most recent first. Back to the MP page for the headline figures and analysed positions.

Showing 761780 of 942 contributions · most-recent first

← PreviousPage 39 of 48Next →
DateDebate & contributionWords
3 Dec 2024Employment Rights Bill (Sixth sitting)

I will not detain the Committee for much longer because, as the Minister said, it felt as though we had the debate on the whole clause during the debates on the amendments. I reiterate my concern about some of the provisions in the clause. Although I accept that the Minister said that, further on in the Bill, there is

labour-marketeconomy-jobs
131
3 Dec 2024Employment Rights Bill (Sixth sitting)

There are a number of options that could be looked at. The time set out in the regulations could be much more flexible. There could be safeguards for force majeure circumstances, which is common in a lot of contracts. There is no reason why that could not be in legislation. Or if the Government want to go down this pat

labour-marketeconomy-jobs
182
3 Dec 2024Employment Rights Bill (Sixth sitting)

I will take one more intervention.

labour-marketeconomy-jobs
6
3 Dec 2024Employment Rights Bill (Sixth sitting)

I am grateful to the hon. Gentleman for his intervention. He is right that there may well be something else that can be done—perhaps a stocktake, or making a start on refurbishing the place, or whatever it might be—but that will not be the case in every circumstance. I can only repeat the point that I am not making thi

labour-marketeconomy-jobs
125
3 Dec 2024Employment Rights Bill (Sixth sitting)

Here we go.

labour-marketeconomy-jobs
3
3 Dec 2024Employment Rights Bill (Sixth sitting)

The hon. Gentleman is right about the principle of notice for holiday—that is quite clearcut. Holiday is pretty much always planned, although there are circumstances in which someone might need to take leave at very short notice—perhaps they have one of those dreaded phone calls that a relative is seriously ill, so the

labour-marketeconomy-jobs
265
3 Dec 2024Employment Rights Bill (Sixth sitting)

I am very happy to do so once I finish this train of thought—we are getting far more debate in Committee than we do in the main Chamber. We have to find the balance, where we do not just point the finger at the business owner or the worker, but see them as a symbiotic being—because neither side can survive or thrive wi

labour-marketeconomy-jobs
65
3 Dec 2024Employment Rights Bill (Sixth sitting)

No, I do not accept that. It is not helpful to see this as either/or. As I explained, there is a symbiotic relationship between businesses and their workers—their employees. Neither succeeds without the other. It is therefore not the case that I, in any way, shape or form, want to put all the burden on one or the other

labour-marketeconomy-jobs
101
3 Dec 2024Employment Rights Bill (Sixth sitting)

Fundamentally, I agree that it is not the worker’s fault either—I am absolutely at one with that. I made it very clear that I do not want to see anyone turn up for work only to be turned away and told, “Sorry, no work today.” That is not a great place for anyone to be. I absolutely understand and accept the hardship th

labour-marketeconomy-jobs
367
3 Dec 2024Employment Rights Bill (Sixth sitting)

I do understand the hon. Lady’s point. Nobody wants to see people turned away as they turn up for work, with their employer saying, “Sorry, no work today.” That is not a position that we want anybody else to find themselves in, but I am trying to make another point. Let us take the hospitality sector as an example, whi

labour-marketeconomy-jobs
215
3 Dec 2024Employment Rights Bill (Sixth sitting)

I will be brief in my response to these Government amendments, which make the requirement for the right to reasonable notice of cancellation or changing of shifts more onerous. I spoke to these principles during our debate on the previous set of amendments in my name, but I ask the Minister gently now, why were these p

labour-marketeconomy-jobs
314
3 Dec 2024Employment Rights Bill (Sixth sitting)

The amendments are intended to probe the Government’s thinking, as once again it is not clear to us in the Opposition whether they have done the necessary policy work to justify the approach taken in the Bill. The impact assessment clearly shows the administrative cost that the Bill will have in shift and workforce pla

labour-marketeconomy-jobs
265
3 Dec 2024Employment Rights Bill (Sixth sitting)

I beg to move amendment 145, in clause 2, page 13, line 25, leave out “a specified amount of time” and insert “48 hours”. This amendment defines reasonable notice of a requestor requirement to work a shift as 48 hours.

labour-marketeconomy-jobs
40
3 Dec 2024Employment Rights Bill (Sixth sitting)

I am grateful to the Minister for that comprehensive outline of clause 1 but, as I reflect on our debate over today’s two sittings on the amendments to clause 1—the Government amendments that now form part of clause 1 and the Opposition’s substantive amendments, which were not accepted, and our probing amendments, whic

labour-marketeconomy-jobs
609
3 Dec 2024Employment Rights Bill (Sixth sitting)

indicated dissent.

labour-marketeconomy-jobs
2
3 Dec 2024Employment Rights Bill (Sixth sitting)

I understand why, in our combative political system, the hon. Gentleman wants to bring up the previous Government’s record. I gently suggest that the covid pandemic had a big impact on all court backlogs, be it tribunals or otherwise, and I ask him to reflect on the fact that the Bill will add to the pressure on the tr

labour-marketeconomy-jobs
104
3 Dec 2024Employment Rights Bill (Sixth sitting)

Quite a list of amendments and edits to the 100-day-old Bill. I will start where the Minister left off. The amendments extend the time for employees to bring a case to the employment tribunal from three to six months if they believe their employer has breached the duties imposed by the Bill. That includes the provision

labour-marketeconomy-jobs
495
3 Dec 2024Employment Rights Bill (Sixth sitting)

Amendment 12 states that it is to be presumed by tribunals “that it was not reasonable for the worker’s contract to have been entered into as a limited-term contract” if the work done “was of the same or a similar nature” as the work undertaken by other employees, with the following conditions: “(i) where the period in

labour-marketeconomy-jobs
179
3 Dec 2024Employment Rights Bill (Sixth sitting)

It is a pleasure to serve under your chairmanship, Mr Stringer. As a precursor to my comments on these specific amendments, I note that the sheer volume of Government amendments that we are considering really goes to show that the Bill might have met a political objective in being published in 100 days, but that it was

labour-marketeconomy-jobs
236
3 Dec 2024Employment Rights Bill (Fifth sitting)

The hon. Gentleman is absolutely right that the previous Government set the reference period at 12 weeks. What we do not have clarity on is whether the Bill will change that. Will the new Government shorten it or lengthen it? It is about clarity. This is a rushed Bill, published in 100 days. We do not have the answers

labour-marketeconomy-jobs
193
← PreviousPage 39 of 48 · click a debate to open the transcript with this MP’s speeches highlightedNext →
Sources
SourceHansard · official report
MethodEach row is one contribution (intervention or speech). Word count from the official text.