The Westminster lensArchive · §02 Speeches · 942 contributions

Speeches by Smith.

Every Hansard contribution by Greg Smith this parliament, most recent first. Back to the MP page for the headline figures and analysed positions.

Showing 661680 of 942 contributions · most-recent first

← PreviousPage 34 of 48Next →
DateDebate & contributionWords
12 Dec 2024Employment Rights Bill (Eleventh sitting)

I think this is one of the least contentious parts of the Bill, and we do not seek to oppose in any way the important protections for pregnant women and new mothers. I note that what the Government are really doing with these clauses is building on the regulations that, as the Minister rightly said, came into force in

labour-marketeconomy-jobs
231
12 Dec 2024Employment Rights Bill (Eleventh sitting)

The Minister tempts me, but I will set out our rationale for new clause 28 and amendment 134. I acknowledge that he has published a series of impact assessments, but the Regulatory Policy Committee has not exactly given the Bill a glowing bill of health, and there are a significant number of red ratings in its assessme

labour-marketeconomy-jobs
518
12 Dec 2024Employment Rights Bill (Eleventh sitting)

As I hope I made clear in my opening remarks, amendment 155 is a probing amendment. I beg to ask leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment, by leave, withdrawn.

labour-marketeconomy-jobs
29
12 Dec 2024Employment Rights Bill (Eleventh sitting)

I do not disagree with what the hon. Gentleman says, but where we do disagree is on the conclusions that we draw from that. I would strongly argue that to introduce primary legislation without an adequate evidence base is foolish, whereas he seems to be arguing that it is fine to do that. I fundamentally agree with the

labour-marketeconomy-jobs
250
12 Dec 2024Employment Rights Bill (Eleventh sitting)

Amendment 155 would make the initial period of employment six months, to align with a standard probationary period. The Government have admitted that they do not have robust data on instances of dismissal for those under two years of employment; in other words, we do not know if there is even a problem with unfair dism

labour-marketeconomy-jobs
105
12 Dec 2024Employment Rights Bill (Eleventh sitting)

I beg to move amendment 155, in schedule 2, page 112, line 23, after “period” insert “of no less than six months”. This amendment makes the initial period of employment at least six months in length.

labour-marketeconomy-jobs
36
12 Dec 2024Employment Rights Bill (Eleventh sitting)

I beg to ask leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment, by leave, withdrawn.

labour-marketeconomy-jobs
13
12 Dec 2024Employment Rights Bill (Eleventh sitting)

It is a pleasure to serve under your chairmanship, Ms Vaz. This pair of amendments on unfair dismissal stand in my name and those of my hon. Friends from the official Opposition. Amendment 156 would make the fact that the employee was made redundant a reason in relation to the dismissal of an employee during the initia

labour-marketeconomy-jobs
397
11 Dec 2024Draft Road Transport (International Passenger Services) (Amendment) Regulations 2024

It is a pleasure to serve under your chairmanship, Mr Efford. As the Minister has stressed, the Interbus agreement is a long-standing agreement that ensures access for bus providers. Rightly, it has always been the policy of the Department for Transport to maintain that access throughout our evolving relationship with

transport
336
10 Dec 2024Employment Rights Bill (Ninth sitting)

In many respects it is my job to be worried, to properly kick the tyres and to understand the operability of what the Government are trying to achieve. I certainly take the hon. Gentleman’s point on sexual harassment, and there is very clear criminal law in place that is probably more appropriate to bring perpetrators

labour-marketeconomy-jobssocial-care
123
10 Dec 2024Employment Rights Bill (Tenth sitting)

The hon. Gentleman is right about the unfair dismissal point. Nobody wants to see anybody unfairly dismissed, but it is impossible to see each measure in the Bill in its own silo or its own column; each is part of the cumulative impact of many measures reverting to day one rights. So, too, is the measure before us, and

labour-marketeconomy-jobs
170
10 Dec 2024Employment Rights Bill (Ninth sitting)

I thank my hon. Friend for that. It may well be such an example. I must admit I resisted the urge to attend The Spectator awards last week. I am told the Health Secretary did make what many considered a very funny speech. However, it is clear that some deem it uncomradely. Who knows? Had this legislation already been e

labour-marketeconomy-jobssocial-care
108
10 Dec 2024Employment Rights Bill (Ninth sitting)

How can I say no to the offer of an excellent example from my hon. Friend?

labour-marketeconomy-jobssocial-care
16
10 Dec 2024Employment Rights Bill (Ninth sitting)

I understand the point the hon. Gentleman is making. However, in the examples he gave he has shown exactly why there is a need to ask the Government to doubly rethink the way in which the original Bill is drafted to ensure that some of those areas are covered off so that the reasonability test is clearer and people do

labour-marketeconomy-jobssocial-care
145
10 Dec 2024Employment Rights Bill (Ninth sitting)

I am not certain that is quite the point that my hon. Friend the Member for West Suffolk was making. However, in the interest of fairness, I will commit to properly looking up that case, which I had not come across until my hon. Friend mentioned it a couple of moments ago.

labour-marketeconomy-jobssocial-care
52
10 Dec 2024Employment Rights Bill (Ninth sitting)

My hon. Friend highlights an issue that would come down to a subjective test, so “reasonableness” could mean something very different in different tribunal settings and to different individuals casting judgment on any such complaint. That goes to the absolute nub of what we are asking the Government to reflect on. Is t

labour-marketeconomy-jobssocial-care
68
10 Dec 2024Employment Rights Bill (Ninth sitting)

The hon. Lady is right to bring the Committee’s attention to that which is already laid down in statute. I think that perhaps where the misunderstanding is coming in—the Opposition are trying to test this—is whether the new reasonability test will deliver perverse results in a tribunal. Probably nobody sitting in this

labour-marketeconomy-jobssocial-care
73
10 Dec 2024Employment Rights Bill (Ninth sitting)

I will give way in a second. Many comedians—Jimmy Carr is an example—talk frequently at the moment about comedy being shut down. It is not criminal; it is not racial hatred or hatred on the basis of religion, sexuality or anything like that. It is beyond those points.

labour-marketeconomy-jobssocial-care
48
10 Dec 2024Employment Rights Bill (Ninth sitting)

I will just finish this point, then I will be delighted to give way to my hon. Friend. The point I am trying to make is that bits of legislation that we are asked to consider sometimes have unintended consequences, and that there is a risk of someone being offended by something that does not pass the reasonability test

labour-marketeconomy-jobssocial-care
83
10 Dec 2024Employment Rights Bill (Ninth sitting)

I think I have been clear that every law available should be used—potentially, more could be passed—to properly prosecute, challenge, shut down and stop anyone inciting hatred on the basis of race, religion, sexuality or whatever it might be. I cannot find any better set of words to make my revulsion at those crimes cl

labour-marketeconomy-jobssocial-care
86
← PreviousPage 34 of 48 · click a debate to open the transcript with this MP’s speeches highlightedNext →
Sources
SourceHansard · official report
MethodEach row is one contribution (intervention or speech). Word count from the official text.