The Westminster lensArchive · §02 Speeches · 597 contributions

Speeches by Amos.

Every Hansard contribution by Gideon Amos this parliament, most recent first. Back to the MP page for the headline figures and analysed positions.

Showing 361380 of 597 contributions · most-recent first

← PreviousPage 19 of 30Next →
DateDebate & contributionWords
28 Apr 2025Planning and Infrastructure Bill (Third sitting)

It is a pleasure to serve with you in the Chair, Mrs Hobhouse. I rise to move amendment 32, which stands in my name. We are pleased that the Government have kept their manifesto commitment to publish the long-awaited consultation on the land use framework—something the Liberal Democrats had long called for. The consult

housingenergyenvironment
704
28 Apr 2025Planning and Infrastructure Bill (Third sitting)

I beg to move amendment 32, in clause 1, page 1, line 16, at end insert— “(3A) After subsection (2), insert— ‘(2A) Any review of a national policy statement in relation to a nationally significant infrastructure project must include consideration of whether the project complies with the Land Use Framework.’” This amend

housingenergyenvironment
67
28 Apr 2025Planning and Infrastructure Bill (Third sitting)

I thank the hon. Members who have spoken. I am grateful to the hon. Member for Ruislip, Northwood and Pinner for reminding me of the discussion about Hinkley, which is 13 miles from my home and is where a lot of my constituents work. In the evidence sessions, much was made of the fish disco. If memory serves, it is an

housingenergyenvironment
117
28 Apr 2025Planning and Infrastructure Bill (Third sitting)

The hon. Gentleman raises another example of a failing that could have been addressed by parliamentary scrutiny. Hon. Members may be wondering why I am referring to the acoustic fish deterrent, but the fact is that such concerns do matter to people, and people do care about species loss and habitat loss. A simple chang

housingenergyenvironment
120
28 Apr 2025Planning and Infrastructure Bill (Fourth sitting)

I do not demur from much of what the Minister says about the provisions. To go back to his remarks about the delays not being caused solely by the chaos under the previous Government, is it not a fact that during the last few years of the Conservative Government, the delays at the decision stage, which is meant to be t

energyhousingenvironment
167
28 Apr 2025Planning and Infrastructure Bill (Third sitting)

Would the hon. Member support a test in the Bill of the quality of the consultation carried out, in place of the mechanistic requirements in the previous Act? They do not actually exist in the Town and Country Planning Act, for example, and normal planning processes.

housingenergyenvironment
46
28 Apr 2025Planning and Infrastructure Bill (Third sitting)

Without wanting to shock the Minister too much, I rise to support the clause. The Liberal Democrats want measures that will help to facilitate net zero and other developments, and the clause will provide an opportunity for many decisions to go into the Town and Country Planning Act regime, which is local, is accountabl

housingenergyenvironment
126
28 Apr 2025Planning and Infrastructure Bill (Third sitting)

The hon. Member accurately highlights the point that I was trying to make in relation to the acoustic fish deterrent, where particular changes could be made through this new route to facilitate projects—changes that would not have had proper parliamentary scrutiny. The Minister may say that the provision would apply on

housingenergyenvironment
214
28 Apr 2025Planning and Infrastructure Bill (Third sitting)

I am grateful to be able to get back to the clause. Clause 2(3)(d) of the Bill is clear that any published Government policy can be the basis for a change through this expedited route, which does not involve parliamentary scrutiny. As I explained earlier, court cases have held that a speech can be admitted as Governmen

housingenergyenvironment
272
28 Apr 2025Planning and Infrastructure Bill (Fourth sitting)

I endorse the clause on behalf of the Liberal Democrats, given that it lays out plans rather than an unplanned approach. Provided that interested parties have an opportunity to scrutinise those plans and be involved in them, we also support the clause. Question put and agreed to. Clause 13 accordingly ordered to stand

energyhousingenvironment
67
28 Apr 2025Planning and Infrastructure Bill (Fourth sitting)

We do not object to the clause either. The date of the judicial review challenge being six weeks from the issue of the decision in writing is consistent with the approach under the Town and Country Planning Act, and therefore does not reduce or change people’s right to judicial review. We are content to support the cla

energyhousingenvironment
89
28 Apr 2025Planning and Infrastructure Bill (Fourth sitting)

People in Taunton and Wellington are four-square behind new clause 19, but it was my hon. Friend the Member for Didcot and Wantage who spoke to it.

energyhousingenvironment
27
28 Apr 2025Planning and Infrastructure Bill (Third sitting)

The justification for the proposal in clause 2 to remove parliamentary requirements for scrutiny and the approval of amendments to national policy statements is that they reflect legislative changes. In our view, that justification is faulty in three respects. First, it is claimed that since Parliament will have consid

housingenergyenvironment
469
23 Apr 2025Planning and Infrastructure Bill (Second sitting)

Q We Liberal Democrats are sympathetic to a number of the changes that the Government are proposing to compulsory purchase and the nationally significant infrastructure projects regime. You mentioned the length of examinations, and you are absolutely right that inspectors have taken longer and longer—I did one in four

housinglocal-governmentenvironment
300
23 Apr 2025Planning and Infrastructure Bill (Second sitting)

Q Welcome to the Committee, and thank you for coming today. We hear a lot of debate around targets for housing numbers, the NPPF and so on. What should be the role of targets for the delivery of social homes in the planning system? Kate Henderson: First, it is a pleasure to be before the Committee; thank you for inviti

housinglocal-governmentenvironment
106
23 Apr 2025Planning and Infrastructure Bill (First sitting)

I was a planning consultant until the general election, but not any more. I am a chartered town planner member of the Royal Town Planning Institute and a chartered architect member of the Royal Institute of British Architects. I am a vice president of the Town and Country Planning Association, but that is an honorary p

energylocal-governmenteconomy-jobs
62
23 Apr 2025Planning and Infrastructure Bill (Second sitting)

Q I, too, am grateful for the Ministers’ time today. In the interests of brevity, I want to ask a question of the Energy Minister. There are provisions in the Bill on overhead lines at generating stations. Are the Government looking at further reforms that would make the delivery of the electricity network simpler and

housinglocal-governmentenvironment
335
23 Apr 2025Planning and Infrastructure Bill (Second sitting)

Q May I ask a supplementary of James? We hear a lot from the federation about the viability challenge of sites. Without rehearsing the whole system and the pressures on development value, what is the HBF’s approach to resolving that issue so that there are fewer schemes going back to appeal, with 106s renegotiated and

housinglocal-governmentenvironment
316
23 Apr 2025Planning and Infrastructure Bill (Second sitting)

Q Let us turn to the compulsory purchase changes and the clause on hope value, which would enable the acquisition of land at existing use value. I support that clause, but as someone practising in the private sector and representing landowners, how do you think that it will take effect? Will it be plain sailing? Cather

housinglocal-governmentenvironment
259
23 Apr 2025Planning and Infrastructure Bill (Second sitting)

Guidance? Councillor Clewer: Yes. Pretty firm guidance, but still guidance, with the ability where you really have the nuance to be able to work around it. Councillor Hug: It goes to the point about having a common core of things, with certain things that apply in certain areas but then a space for guidance on top of t

housinglocal-governmentenvironment
191
← PreviousPage 19 of 30 · click a debate to open the transcript with this MP’s speeches highlightedNext →
Sources
SourceHansard · official report
MethodEach row is one contribution (intervention or speech). Word count from the official text.