The Westminster lensArchive · §02 Speeches · 563 contributions

Speeches by Amos.

Every Hansard contribution by Gideon Amos this parliament, most recent first. Back to the MP page for the headline figures and analysed positions.

Showing 281300 of 563 contributions · most-recent first

← PreviousPage 15 of 29Next →
DateDebate & contributionWords
13 May 2025Planning and Infrastructure Bill (Eighth sitting)

Does my hon. Friend agree that the Minister’s supportive comments about the delivery of infrastructure, how it will unlock housing and how it needs to come forward to do so mean that he must be lending his support to the reopening of Wellington station in my constituency, which would unlock several thousand new homes?

housingenvironmentlocal-government
79
13 May 2025Planning and Infrastructure Bill (Eighth sitting)

It is a pleasure to serve with you in the Chair, Mrs Hobhouse. I rise to speak to amendments 88 and 89, which together relate to spatial development strategies and their content. The important point is that spatial development strategies should provide properly for climate change mitigation and adaptation. Currently, t

housingenvironmentlocal-government
175
13 May 2025Planning and Infrastructure Bill (Eighth sitting)

I beg to move amendment 88, in clause 47, page 66, line 1, leave out “may” and insert “must”. This amendment would create a requirement that spatial development strategies specify infrastructure of strategic importance for the purposes set out in subsection (4).

housingenvironmentlocal-government
42
13 May 2025Planning and Infrastructure Bill (Seventh sitting)

We have always accepted and we support that allocation of funding to social housing, but a theme in Government thinking seems to be that the delivery of more homes through the private sector will bring prices down. If the Minister wishes to correct me, he should feel free to do so. That was my central point: we cannot

housinglocal-governmentenvironment
301
13 May 2025Planning and Infrastructure Bill (Seventh sitting)

I will not give way. I need to get back to the present day, if the hon. Gentleman will forgive me. It is important to dwell not on the proposed cuts of £22 billion to capital expenditure from 2009-10 onwards that the outgoing Labour Government were proposing, but on the reality of the situation that faces people who ne

housinglocal-governmentenvironment
334
13 May 2025Planning and Infrastructure Bill (Seventh sitting)

The hon. Member for Basingstoke invited me to go down memory lane to what was happening in 2009, 2010 and so on. I am happy to do so. The Liberal Democrats went into coalition at that point. They were 9% of the Members of Parliament, but prevented a great deal of the worst excesses of the Conservative Government over t

housinglocal-governmentenvironment
134
13 May 2025Planning and Infrastructure Bill (Seventh sitting)

Further to that point of order, Dr Huq. I echo the comments of other members of the Committee. We have so far followed the groupings on the selection list, and within each group we have voted on each amendment that has been pushed to a vote. New clauses may be a different matter, but that is what has happened in the Co

housinglocal-governmentenvironment
64
13 May 2025Planning and Infrastructure Bill (Seventh sitting)

Amendment 29 would give effect to the Liberal Democrat target of building 150,000 new social homes per year by introducing such a requirement into spatial development strategies. It is a commitment set out in our manifesto, alongside a funding commitment of £6 billion per annum of capital investment—above current level

housinglocal-governmentenvironment
350
13 May 2025Planning and Infrastructure Bill (Seventh sitting)

I beg to move amendment 29, in clause 47, page 65, line 36, at end insert— “(2A) A spatial development strategy must have regard to the need to provide 150,000 new social homes nationally a year.” This amendment would require spatial development strategy to have regard to the need to provide 150,000 social homes nation

housinglocal-governmentenvironment
57
13 May 2025Planning and Infrastructure Bill (Seventh sitting)

So when do we vote on amendments 75 and 82 and new clause—

housinglocal-governmentenvironment
13
13 May 2025Planning and Infrastructure Bill (Seventh sitting)

I rise simply to confirm that we will press new clause 104 to a vote.

housinglocal-governmentenvironment
15
13 May 2025Planning and Infrastructure Bill (Seventh sitting)

indicated assent.

housinglocal-governmentenvironment
2
13 May 2025Planning and Infrastructure Bill (Seventh sitting)

I rise to speak to new clause 104, which relates to green belt protection. We recognise that the Government’s proposals are set out in the national planning policy framework. We do not support the way in which the standard method is being imposed on local authorities, nor do we support the way in which green belt relea

housinglocal-governmentenvironment
404
13 May 2025Planning and Infrastructure Bill (Seventh sitting)

I beg to ask leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment, by leave, withdrawn.

housinglocal-governmentenvironment
13
13 May 2025Planning and Infrastructure Bill (Seventh sitting)

I am grateful to the Minister for that clarification, and he has my respect for bringing strategic planning back into the system. I know he has worked on that for a number of years; some of us have also worked on regional planning for a number of years and can remember the regional spatial strategy processes—in fact, t

housinglocal-governmentenvironment
299
13 May 2025Planning and Infrastructure Bill (Seventh sitting)

Dr Huq, I do not know whether I get the opportunity to sum up, so I have jumped in with an intervention. Could the Minister clarify the circumstances in which an individual unitary authority—perhaps a unitary county such as Somerset, or Oxfordshire, if it becomes a unitary county—would be required to, on its own, prepa

housinglocal-governmentenvironment
88
13 May 2025Planning and Infrastructure Bill (Seventh sitting)

It is a pleasure to serve with you in the Chair, Dr Huq—although I was not sure how much of a pleasure until you introduced the sitting in the way that you did. Amendments 21 and 22 would remove the requirement on unitary authorities to prepare spatial development strategies, simply based on the resources that unitary

housinglocal-governmentenvironment
275
13 May 2025Planning and Infrastructure Bill (Seventh sitting)

I beg to move amendment 21, in clause 47, page 62, leave out from line 32 to line 2 on page 63. This relates to amendment 22. This amendment would remove the requirement for unitary authorities to prepare spatial development strategies.

housinglocal-governmentenvironment
41
12 May 2025Planning and Infrastructure Bill (Sixth sitting)

I rise to support amendment 152. The Liberal Democrats have a similar measure on the amendment paper, new clause 11, which also refers to the accessibility of housing. We are pleased to support this amendment, and we support training for planning authorities in general. In the Minister’s summing up, can he address the

housinglocal-governmentenvironment
70
12 May 2025Planning and Infrastructure Bill (Sixth sitting)

As an illustration of the hon. Gentleman’s point about unbuilt planning permissions, in Somerset there are permissions for 11,000 new homes that have not been built, while the new NPPF requires a 41% increase in the allocation of permissions. There is no record of these pressures having led to an increase in the number

housinglocal-governmentenvironment
59
← PreviousPage 15 of 29 · click a debate to open the transcript with this MP’s speeches highlightedNext →
Sources
SourceHansard · official report
MethodEach row is one contribution (intervention or speech). Word count from the official text.