The Westminster lensArchive · §02 Speeches · 563 contributions

Speeches by Amos.

Every Hansard contribution by Gideon Amos this parliament, most recent first. Back to the MP page for the headline figures and analysed positions.

Showing 241260 of 563 contributions · most-recent first

← PreviousPage 13 of 29Next →
DateDebate & contributionWords
14 May 2025Planning and Infrastructure Bill (Tenth sitting)

I beg to move amendment 23, in clause 66, page 97, line 13, leave out “separately” and insert “to the body established under section [Independent oversight of administration of nature restoration levy]”. This amendment is consequential on NC18. This amendment would require Natural England to report to an independent ov

environmenthousing
60
14 May 2025Planning and Infrastructure Bill (Tenth sitting)

I will spend a few moments on these amendments, because they concern the important oversight body, and I will speak to them together, so Committee members need not fear—I do not have five separate speeches. I know how disappointed they will be. The amendments are about an independent oversight body for Natural England.

environmenthousing
467
14 May 2025Planning and Infrastructure Bill (Tenth sitting)

I am grateful to the Minister for the Government’s response to the proposals. I can only restate some of the concerns we have about potential conflicts of interest in relation to Natural England administering, collecting and spending the money, and judging its own effectiveness. The fact that the Secretary of State is

environmenthousing
244
14 May 2025Planning and Infrastructure Bill (Tenth sitting)

I am grateful to the Minister for taking the time to respond to our concerns, but, as I said, such a concentration of functions so closely related to each other—establishing the EDP, collecting and spending the funds, and monitoring its effectiveness—in what is a single system surely requires some separate oversight, r

environmenthousing
74
14 May 2025Planning and Infrastructure Bill (Tenth sitting)

I am grateful to Committee members for responding to our amendment about payment of the restoration levy up front. The Minister raises the objection that it might prevent multi-phase payments. In response to the hon. Member for Hamble Valley, my hon. Friend the Member for Didcot and Wantage made very clear that the int

environmenthousing
244
14 May 2025Planning and Infrastructure Bill (Ninth sitting)

I beg to move amendment 11, in clause 58, page 89, line 38, at end insert— “(2A) An EDP may not be amended if the amendment would reduce the amount, extent or impact of conservation measures that are to be taken to protect the identified environmental features.” This amendment would mean that the Secretary of State cou

environmenthousing
81
14 May 2025Planning and Infrastructure Bill (Ninth sitting)

It is a pleasure to serve on the Committee with you in the Chair, Dr Huq. Some points have already been made on the underlying point of amendment 14, so I will be reasonably brief, but clause 55 goes to the heart of the overall improvement test and is crucial to the structure of the Bill. In many ways, amendment 14 has

environmenthousing
520
14 May 2025Planning and Infrastructure Bill (Tenth sitting)

I beg to move amendment 9, in clause 66, page 96, line 20, at end insert— “(1A) The regulations must require Natural England to ensure that use of money received by virtue of the nature restoration levy is not unreasonably delayed.” The amendment would ensure that funding would be available for upfront nature restorati

environmenthousing
59
14 May 2025Planning and Infrastructure Bill (Ninth sitting)

Broken Tory promises!

environmenthousing
3
14 May 2025Planning and Infrastructure Bill (Tenth sitting)

I rise to speak to our amendment 121. Our primary concern is that the Bill’s proposed amendments to the Protection of Badgers Act 1992 will, for the first time, introduce permission to kill badgers, in addition to the power to interfere with their setts. Badgers are a much-loved British species of wild animal, and one

environmenthousing
650
14 May 2025Planning and Infrastructure Bill (Tenth sitting)

I understand that interference with badgers is sometimes necessary for development or perhaps for environmental measures, but can the Minister explain why the existing powers are not sufficient? These are powers that enable interference with a badger sett, which may indeed mean the badgers are killed, and the sett to b

environmenthousing
69
14 May 2025Planning and Infrastructure Bill (Tenth sitting)

It is a privilege to continue to serve the Committee with you back in the Chair, Mrs Hobhouse. The mitigation hierarchy is incredibly important. In fact, the Liberal Democrats were aiming to put down an amendment very similar to this one, but the hon. Member for North Herefordshire beat us to it—congratulations to her

environmenthousing
127
14 May 2025Planning and Infrastructure Bill (Ninth sitting)

I appreciate the Minister’s explanation. He addressed a number of the points in our amendment, including that an EDP should not be amended to reduce the amount or extent of conservation measures. He explained that in circumstances in which there is a reduction in development, there might be a need to reduce the amount

environmenthousing
184
14 May 2025Planning and Infrastructure Bill (Tenth sitting)

As always, I am grateful to the Minister for his intervention. I would argue that it is possible to carry out the actions that he described without unreasonable delay, which is what our amendment seeks. The Government cannot have it both ways: on the one hand, it is ambiguous; on the other hand, it would definitely mea

environmenthousing
122
14 May 2025Planning and Infrastructure Bill (Ninth sitting)

It is with great excitement that we move on to another clause. I will speak briefly, but this is an important amendment. In the same way that protests from developers, in another part of the planning system, about viability end up affecting the outcomes of planning applications by, in particular, reducing social housin

environmenthousing
270
14 May 2025Planning and Infrastructure Bill (Ninth sitting)

Does the Minister know that the same “significant” test under the Environment Act 2021 has not been subject to a single legal challenge?

environmenthousing
23
14 May 2025Planning and Infrastructure Bill (Ninth sitting)

I am grateful to the Minister; I will give him an opportunity to move on to our amendment 14, which I hope he agrees is in the spirit of that approach. I sympathise with the point made by the shadow Minister, and I understand the qualitative difference with a site-by-site approach, in which outcomes may more easily be

environmenthousing
97
14 May 2025Planning and Infrastructure Bill (Ninth sitting)

Will the Minister give way?

environmenthousing
5
14 May 2025Planning and Infrastructure Bill (Tenth sitting)

I will be reasonably brief—the Committee will be pleased to know that I have been striking sections out of my speaking notes as the Committee days wear on. [Hon. Members: “Hear, hear!”] Louder! Amendment 9 would ensure that funding was available up front from the nature restoration levy and to provide mitigation on dev

environmenthousing
270
14 May 2025Planning and Infrastructure Bill (Tenth sitting)

Both are possible.

environmenthousing
3
← PreviousPage 13 of 29 · click a debate to open the transcript with this MP’s speeches highlightedNext →
Sources
SourceHansard · official report
MethodEach row is one contribution (intervention or speech). Word count from the official text.