Speeches by Anderson.

“Is there a precedent of you seeing a due diligence form or for asking—I know this is an unusual appointment, because the Cabinet Office did the due diligence, so you didn’t see it. Could you have asked for the FCDO to also do due diligence, seeing that you were going to be Peter Mandelson’s line manager and you were di…”

“Just to be clear—I think you have been asked before about how you raised this with the Foreign Secretary—in that week of the 15th, you were told, and, on the 18th, it became public. Did you have a conversation with the Foreign Secretary during that week? This is the most high-profile appointment and it is a very contro…”

“Thank you very much, Sir Philip, for coming to give us evidence today. I have some questions about the due diligence part of the process. Were there any other FCDO appointments like this, where you were told about the due diligence, and it was an FCDO appointment, after the due diligence had been done?”

“So it was a situation that needed to be resolved during that week. Do you think that the process of that week—the due diligence part of this and the timing of it—is evidence of pressure, of undue pressure, or of due process being followed?”

“Is there any record of that meeting where you established that the Foreign Secretary was happy with that?”

“Just a bit more on the process: you were told about it in a phone call on 15 December, but you were not given the due diligence checklist, which we have in front of us—it is part of the Humble Address papers—that had already been completed. Did you see the conflict of interest paper at that time?”

“With the benefit of hindsight and many months to look at this and to think about the whole process, where did the process go wrong? Was it at the early stage of even considering him, was it the due diligence, or was it the vetting?”

“By your own admission it was a very unusual political appointment. The whole process tested the system to the limit. We are looking at how the system worked in this case but also at what we need to learn for the future. You were told quite late on in the process. Due diligence had been done, then you were told that he …”

“With the benefit of hindsight and many months to look at this and to think about the whole process, where did the process go wrong? Was it at the early stage of even considering him, was it the due diligence, or was it the vetting?”

“So they were the concerns that would have been raised by the due diligence form about the different things we can see here. Epstein, for example, was in that.”

“I have one more question—one more piece of the puzzle—going back to access talks that you held before the election with people who were then shadow Ministers. Did the issue of political appointments, including the appointment of the ambassador to the US or appointing Peter Mandelson, come up in access talks, and would …”

“So it was a situation that needed to be resolved during that week. Do you think that the process of that week—the due diligence part of this and the timing of it—is evidence of pressure, of undue pressure, or of due process being followed?”

“Okay. We are trying to get to the bottom of who really proposed Mandelson’s appointment. You have said you were sorry for your part in it, but also that, before you started in post after the election, there were some access talks. You referred to access talks in January 2024, which you were not party to, but which happ…”

“At the two dinners and lunches that you attended, did Peter Mandelson lobby you about becoming the ambassador to the US?”

“In the process you have talked about, George Osborne and Peter Mandelson were the two names in play. How far did the process of George Osborne’s potential appointment, which then did not lead on, go? Did he have due diligence assessment made of him?”

“Just a bit more on the process: you were told about it in a phone call on 15 December, but you were not given the due diligence checklist, which we have in front of us—it is part of the Humble Address papers—that had already been completed. Did you see the conflict of interest paper at that time?”

“But have you had experience of people not passing due diligence? Is it a process that is a pass or fail then?”

“Thank you for coming in to see us today. I am going to take you back to the very beginning of the process. It is famous that Peter Mandelson hosted dinners with political people at his house and in restaurants—it is widely reported. Did you attend any of those dinners in 2024 or up to your departure in 2025 at his hous…”

“I know you were not there at the interview. Do you think he was asked enough open questions or had the ability to give the full extent of his relationship?”

“Who did you write the email to?”